It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nightstalker78
reply to post by ThreeBears
"And Two I raised mostly ON MY OWN with ZERO support from their DEADBEAT FATHER,
I might add.
No child support, Nada, an Asshole Christian I might add, good ole sexist redneck piece of #
Why am I not surprised you resorted to name calling? that's what most of you women do nowadays since yo' baby daddy ain't around.
You leached off the government.Well the taxpayers of the US.
Face it you couldn't take care of them.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by ThreeBears
This is a prime example of why all unions, interest groups and just about any other facetious "rights" groups should be abolished.
Your post highlights the main problem with people's thinking. "Oh workers rights, labour rights, insurance, benefits, lieu days, sick days, blah blah blah"
Yes, women used to contribute to households not by slaving themselves out. And they were respected for it no matter what the dastardly world of twisted reflection on history tells you.
The problem is no one is even willing to work without saying, "What about me?" before putting any effort in.
I hired 6 people last year, ended up doing all the tasks I had set out for them myself. They were useless...
The war in Afghanistan costs US taxpayers two billion dollars a week, according to calculations made by the Department of Defense Monday. Read more: www.rawa.org...
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
2 billion dollars is What America spends a week in Afghanistan.
The war in Afghanistan costs US taxpayers two billion dollars a week, according to calculations made by the Department of Defense Monday. Read more: www.rawa.org...
I don't know if that figure is correct, but even if its a month or 6 months its too much, if it means sacrificing support back home to the citizens who have funded these wars.
costofwar.com...
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Cancerwarrior
I have always worked jobs but I'm on disability now. My little social security check and food stamps are whats keeping us alive right now. I have neuropathy from IL treatments as well as many other side effects of cancer treatments and I'll be not working for a while.
I'm not a "baby-factory" or a "deadbeat bum." I'm a 35 year old army veteran of two wars. I've been a construction worker and a pipeline surveyor. Now I am in a situation where I have to depend on others even though I've been very independent my whole life.
I want to personally thank you for contributing to the thread here. It's very easy for folks to post opinions and anecdotal stories from both sides of the matter. It's far less so to admit what you have here when you're a proud man just looking to make it from one month to the next while in hardships which are not of your making or choosing.
Originally posted by Cancerwarrior
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Cancerwarrior
I have always worked jobs but I'm on disability now. My little social security check and food stamps are whats keeping us alive right now. I have neuropathy from IL treatments as well as many other side effects of cancer treatments and I'll be not working for a while.
I'm not a "baby-factory" or a "deadbeat bum." I'm a 35 year old army veteran of two wars. I've been a construction worker and a pipeline surveyor. Now I am in a situation where I have to depend on others even though I've been very independent my whole life.
I want to personally thank you for contributing to the thread here. It's very easy for folks to post opinions and anecdotal stories from both sides of the matter. It's far less so to admit what you have here when you're a proud man just looking to make it from one month to the next while in hardships which are not of your making or choosing.
You're welcome. I've never had rich relatives to give me money when needed. I've never had the oppurtunities that many people had to better themselves. Most people would not be impressed by my modest little house or anything in it. Everything I have I worked and saved for myself. I am honestly lucky to be alive right now after dealing twice now with stage 4 melanoma the past 2 years. So hearing people talk about all of the "government bums" angers me. I've never been a bum to anyone. Yes, I know there are people that qualify for the system when they probably should'nt and recieve benefits when they should'nt. People tend to forget though, you might be alright now, but God forbid something happens to you like it did to me and you NEED the help.
I think we are gonna see more and more of these types of cuts. And people will care less and less. I hate to say that, but I just see the majority of society getting more and more self centered and thinking more of only their well being.
I went to WalMart the other day and picked up a few things. As I was leaving the parking lot I saw two older ladies in a car with a flat tire. I stopped and asked if I could help them. The lady said no thanks, she finally got hold of her husband who was on his way to change it. The lady thanked me though and said they had been sitting there for 30 minutes and I was the only person who had stopped and asked if I could help them. And I live in a rural part of Louisiana where folks are polite and generally like to help others out. That got me thinking of how increasingly uncompassionate our society is becoming.
Originally posted by sean
My generation is wondering if retirement is feasible, I guess the next generations retirement is one of those hollow point bullets.
Unions were hijacked by Chrony capitalist rackets
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I support cutting Food Stamps. I support cutting Welfare. I support cutting military budgets. I support cutting foreign aid money. I support ALL cuts. It's probably too little to late since 2008 the USA is so far in the red we'll never recover. Then their will be no money for ANYONE or ANYTHING. Instead of cutting food stamps THERE WILL BE NO FOOD STAMPS AT ALL. If you cannot realize that you have no business being in this debate.
Originally posted by Kgnow
I hope the food stamp cut-backs hinder the.... "I don't have to worry about the consequences of sleeping around, the tax payers will be my baby's daddy," mentality that is crippling the soul of our society. Too many women are happily sleeping around without a second thought regarding the integrity of the man.... will he be a good father.... a good provider? Nope, it doesn't matter, just hike up the taxes on the working-class to cover it all.
For how many honest folk you may know on food stamps that are justified for the help they receive,... I know many, many more who are professional baby factories. Just keep popping out the babies because they know it'll get them more "gov'ment cheese", more social program awards, vouchers, and tax breaks.
I want to see the professional baby factories and the "who cares about a father, I got gov'ment cheese" women extremely hindered by this OP.
I'm all for compassion and helping others,.... but the "baby-daddy" mentality is a stench I can not get used to. Not on the dime of those who work their butts off trying to make an honest living.
McDonald's is always hiring.
edit on 19-6-2013 by Kgnow because: (no reason given)
I hope the food stamp cut-backs hinder the.... "I don't have to worry about the consequences of sleeping around, the tax payers will be my baby's daddy," mentality that is crippling the soul of our society.
Too many women are happily sleeping around without a second thought regarding the integrity of the man.... will he be a good father.... a good provider? Nope, it doesn't matter, just hike up the taxes on the working-class to cover it all.
Just keep popping out the babies because they know it'll get them more "gov'ment cheese"
"who cares about a father, I got gov'ment cheese"
A new CBPP analysis of budget and Census data, however, shows that more than 90 percent of the benefit dollars that entitlement and other mandatory programs[1] spend go to assist people who are elderly, seriously disabled, or members of working households — not to able-bodied, working-age Americans who choose not to work. (See Figure 1.) This figure has changed little in the past few years.
Federal budget and Census data show that, in 2010, 91 percent of the benefit dollars from entitlement and other mandatory programs went to the elderly (people 65 and over), the seriously disabled, and members of working households. People who are neither elderly nor disabled — and do not live in a working household — received only 9 percent of the benefits.
Moreover, the vast bulk of that 9 percent goes for medical care, unemployment insurance benefits (which individuals must have a significant work history to receive), Social Security survivor benefits for the children and spouses of deceased workers, and Social Security benefits for retirees between ages 62 and 64. Seven out of the 9 percentage points go for one of these four purposes.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by jjkenobi
I support cutting Food Stamps. I support cutting Welfare. I support cutting military budgets. I support cutting foreign aid money. I support ALL cuts. It's probably too little to late since 2008 the USA is so far in the red we'll never recover. Then their will be no money for ANYONE or ANYTHING. Instead of cutting food stamps THERE WILL BE NO FOOD STAMPS AT ALL. If you cannot realize that you have no business being in this debate.
I sure hope you DO support gun rights, more police and a dramatic increase to both morgue facilities and cemeteries. When all your cuts are done, civil unrest won't be theory. It'll be a simple reality as it is in many areas of the world and for the very same reasons.
I'll tell you flat out and honest here. If I looked down into the face of my son and saw real, physical hunger and the inability to find a means to meet his basic needs for lack of work? I would do whatever it required to see he got his basics in life. If that mean scrubbing commodes and polishing boots? So be it. If even that work couldn't be found? What do you have to be stolen or killed for? You kinda see where I'm going here? That's not hyperbole....and I'm not predisposed to that behavior. Millions of others already are. Push people into REAL hunger as is common in much of the world but virtually unknown in America? Yes..you'd better support firearms. You'll need one. 24/7. Our nation will become that dangerous a place until 10's of millions simply die off in bad economic times to balance the population vs. jobs.
The safety nets of the social programs were intended to prevent that. They were meant and do manage to prevent the awful realities of what this country saw during the Great Depression ....when only a fraction of today's population existed to suffer and society was far less brutal by nature. To throw that level of true desperation in now? Well..... The Georgia Guide Stones will have their population adjustment made alright, with blood in the streets. Like the Middle and Upper class....as those least equipped to handle the casual violence and result of a world gone mad.
What will cause greater civil unrest: Cutting some of the food stamp money now, or cutting it all off in five years. I haven't seen any politician propose kicking deadbeats off of food stamps. How about we start by kicking off anyone age 18-50 who doesn' t have kids and isn't disabled. Do you realize our economy and the dollar are hanging by a thread? Just the hint of the fed raising rates caused a massive market crash. The U.S. doesn't have the money to do any of this - we're printing it out of thin air and have been for years.