It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Prosecutors claimed they were missing records of calls to and from two of Brown's telephones before Sept. 1, 2010. They claimed Brown's service provider, MetroPCS, no longer had the records. Prosecution relied on Moss's and other co-conspirators' cell phone records to try to prove Brown's involvement in the armed robberies.
But Marshall Dore Louis, the Miami attorney representing Brown, filed a motion to compel production of records, which he claims may show Brown was not involved in a July 2010 robbery attempt.
The NSA surveillance program that was exposed this month proves that the government can get data on Brown's calls, the attorney says in his motion to compel.
(Source: Courthouse News)
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenbaum ordered the government to respond to Brown's motion, and said the court would determine whether Brown's surveillance was lawfully authorized and conducted.
The U.S. attorney general may file an affidavit if he feels that disclosure or a hearing would harm national security interests, according to Judge Rosenbaum's June 10 order. The judge gave the government two days to produce the records.
"The Court regrets the short deadline for compliance but notes that the evidence that defendant Brown seeks pertains to a trial that has been underway since May 31, 2013, and any order requiring the production of any materials sought would become meaningless if such items were not produced in sufficient time for the defense to use them in its case," the judge wrote.
Originally posted by GrantedBail
I am dying to know if and how the government responded. I searched around and only found a couple of stories that basically relate the same one in your OP.
Not to be a kill-joy or anything but I bet they squirm out. If they had two days to produce the records, there should have been at least some kind of response to the court.
To assist the Court and court personnel in handling any motions, pleadings and implementing anyorders relating to the CIPA proceedings, the government requests that the Court designate Daniel O.Hartenstein as the CISO for this case, to perform the duties and responsibilities prescribed for CISO’s inthe Security Procedures promulgated by the Chief Justice.The government further requests that the Court designate the following persons as AlternateCISO, to serve in the event Mr. Hartenstine is unavailable: Jennifer H. Campbell, Branden M. Forsgren,Christine E. Gunning, Joan B. Kennedy, Michael P. Macisso, Maura L. Peterson, Carli V. Rodriquez-Feo,Harry J. Rucker, and W. Scooter Slade.
now I do not know if the US attorney general will use that or not, but my thinking is he willl.
The U.S. attorney general may file an affidavit if he feels that disclosure or a hearing would harm national security interests, according to Judge Rosenbaum's June 10 order. The judge gave the government two days to produce the records.
Originally posted by GermanShep
They are not in "trouble". Just about every politician or alphabet agency is in "trouble" and not a damn thing is ever or will ever be done about it.
Gs