It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
reply to post by Wonderer2012
One,its a CIVIL WAR!
Two, the UN has not accused them nor acted against the Syrian govt.
Three, the UK, part of the UN has lifted weapons embargo against Syria.
They are playing ball perfectly LEGIT.
The USA has accused Syria of the use of chemical weapons. If the USA acts it does so knowing that they may face the wrath of Russia and China.edit on 18-6-2013 by shaneslaughta because: (no reason given)
A 'civil war' engineered by the UK and US. Made possible by our tax dollars.
'Legit'?
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
lol the French have always hated the British and that ex French president dumas more like dumb ass for believing this propaganda. No way the British people will accept another war and I assure you the only war will be the public against the government if that happens.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
lol the French have always hated the British and that ex French president dumas more like dumb ass for believing this propaganda. No way the British people will accept another war and I assure you the only war will be the public against the government if that happens.
You still holding on to this 'them vs us' mentality?
Britain will accept a war, I mean since when do the people decide anything? If we go to war, what will you do, protest?
Good one
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
Well the Syrian people certainly didn't ask for the Taliban to imbed them selves into their lives. No one engineered it, the Taliban were trained by the CIA in the 80's. So if they are good at Guerrilla tactics, we have no one to blame but US.
Who has been supplying the rebels arms thus far?
Thanks for the history, but i still believe that they were trained to fight the Russians in the 80's
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
Even though the Taliban never existed until 1994....
he Reagan administration increased arming and funding of the mujahideen as part of the Reagan Doctrine, thanks in large part to the efforts of Charlie Wilson and CIA officer Gust Avrakotos. Early reports estimated $6–20 billion but more recent reports suggest that up to $40 billion were provided by the U.S. and Saudi Arabia to Pakistan. This was in the forms of cash and weapons, which included over two thousand FIM-92 Stinger surface-to-air missiles.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by shaneslaughta
why would it be an act of war?
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
lol the French have always hated the British and that ex French president dumas more like dumb ass for believing this propaganda. No way the British people will accept another war and I assure you the only war will be the public against the government if that happens.
You still holding on to this 'them vs us' mentality?
Britain will accept a war, I mean since when do the people decide anything? If we go to war, what will you do, protest?
Good one
Yes considering its our tax money that has been funding the wars. How will they start a war if no one pays tax anymore money is power take away the power and the government is left powerless. The people have the power and they don't want to fund another war that they never agreed to. So stop with your propaganda and saying that UK wants a war.edit on 6/18/1313 by Sk8ergrl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by shaneslaughta
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by shaneslaughta
why would it be an act of war?
So if i arm your enemy who your at war with; with weapons to use against you, you wouldn't consider me taking sides in a war?
Its an act of war, might not be the first shot, but im arming your enemy....its an act of war against your nation.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
I agree if we all stopped paying taxes then we would regain our power, but that is not going to happen because we are divided and most people do not care because they don't see how it affects them.
The UK does however, 100% want war. NOT THE UK PEOPLE, but those who control both sides of our political system. Be clear on this.
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
reply to post by Wonderer2012
Do you really think that the British government will want to push us to breaking point if they go ahead with another useless war? It will cause mass civil unrest and it'll be a lot worse then the London riots, this will spark millions of people rioting and tbh the police cannot handle that many people. The armed forces are in another country so I don't see this happening.