It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
San Diegans unsettled by revelations that the federal government has collected vast troves of information about them might also look in their own rearview mirrors, as local governments are amassing data on their comings and goings for the purpose of fighting crime. Police vehicles equipped with cameras pointing every direction canvass parking lots and streets, gathering data about the time, date and place individual license plates are spotted.
The data trove had 32 million data points as of January, with 2 million records added each month.
In one 30-day period last year, the technology was used to analyze 1,700 seized vehicles in collaboration with the San Diego Law Enforcement Coordination Center, according to the January document. The center is an anti-terrorism effort for sharing information among federal, state and local government.
“My strong assumption is they’re just declaring 3 million people in San Diego County as being under investigation.”
Originally posted by Common Good
This is disgusting.
I want to throw up.
Sorry I cant be more accurate with my response- but its how I truly feel at the moment.
The San Diego Police Department finds the technology so helpful for policing that it wants to add more.
Originally posted by Heliophant
Even the local birds think this is crap. Just look at the bird poo on his overhead lights!
Necessary levity aside, I think we have already tumbled over the slippery slope and are approaching terminal velocity as we plummet toward whatever is at the bottom.
Originally posted by severdsoul
saw a portable version about a month ago here in SW Montana,
they had it mounted on a tripod and 1 state and 2 local cop cars were
parked along the side of the road.
This is what i though it was. told the wife it was to scan licensplates,
she thought it was cool until i told her ya, unless they want you, and they set it up
some where, with cops a mile down the road on either side.
then they just wait.....
Oh, and those that still think they can get away with driving without insurance..
i'm betting that will stop real soon. if they can scan that many, imagine how many
tickets they will be mailing out when they cross refrence the plates with insurance
records.
I don't see the big deal.
Originally posted by whyamIhere
reply to post by kaylaluv
I don't see the big deal.
The big deal is many thousands of men and women who gave their lives for Freedom.
Including some of my family members.
The Constitution is not just an old dusty document.
It's my "Birth Right" and I will not give up those rights.
They are precious to me and others...Hence, "The Big Deal".
Originally posted by whyamIhere
reply to post by kaylaluv
I don't see the big deal.
The big deal is many thousands of men and women who gave their lives for Freedom.
Including some of my family members.
The Constitution is not just an old dusty document.
It's my "Birth Right" and I will not give up those rights.
They are precious to me and others...Hence, "The Big Deal".
Originally posted by kaylaluv
I don't really understand the outrage. If I am out walking around in public, anyone could look at me, right? I mean, it's not against the law to look at someone who is in a public area, right? I sit at public park benches and people-watch for hours. Am I doing something evil? If I see a man trying to abduct a child while I'm people-watching, I will do something to stop it. Is that bad?
If I am driving my car on a public road, anyone could see my license plate, right? It's not illegal to look at someone's license plate if their car is on a public street. If I am the perpetrator of a hit and run, and someone turns me in based on seeing my license plate, is that bad?
If you don't want anyone to look at you or your car, don't go or drive outside. Now, let me know when they start putting cameras in people's homes. That IS bad. But in public areas where everyone and anyone can see you anyway, I don't see the big deal.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by kaylaluv
I don't really understand the outrage. If I am out walking around in public, anyone could look at me, right? I mean, it's not against the law to look at someone who is in a public area, right? I sit at public park benches and people-watch for hours. Am I doing something evil? If I see a man trying to abduct a child while I'm people-watching, I will do something to stop it. Is that bad?
If I am driving my car on a public road, anyone could see my license plate, right? It's not illegal to look at someone's license plate if their car is on a public street. If I am the perpetrator of a hit and run, and someone turns me in based on seeing my license plate, is that bad?
If you don't want anyone to look at you or your car, don't go or drive outside. Now, let me know when they start putting cameras in people's homes. That IS bad. But in public areas where everyone and anyone can see you anyway, I don't see the big deal.
You are correct, if i am out walking around people can see me. However, taking photographic images is not the same as "seeing". More over, using those photos to collect data on where I am going is not "seeing". If being seen by an omnipresent human force is the price of going outside, I will stay inside.
On a related note, if photographing is the same as "seeing", why all the fuss about pirating movies and music? I would think that they can't have that argument both ways.