It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Czulkang
The only solution I'm aware of is not a solution anyone would want to see happen. It's the most dangerous gamble we could ever make. A Constitutional Convention could be called and at such a Convention, the States would each be represented. *ALL* of the Constitution is then open, in theory, to modification and amendment. Things like Term Limits could be written in and without a Congressman having any particular say in the matter. A new provision allowing a general recall under defined conditions could also be added.
Then, the results of the Convention would go to ratification in the State Houses, as I recall the guides for this, when a 2/3 support needed to carry the changes made at the convention.
Now I don't really need to explain why the left would NEVER want to see this happen. A picture says it in a thousand words.
(2012 County-Based Election Results)
I sure wouldn't call it any slam dunk though....as tables can turn and feelings can shift either by legitimate change or fraudulent influence from either side. Our very core document and values would, for a moment. be in a free for all change environment.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Yes. The idea that the people can replace the Government at any time is a cornerstone guiding principle of the US Constitution.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by babybunnies
Yes. The idea that the people can replace the Government at any time is a cornerstone guiding principle of the US Constitution.
Exactly where is that stated in the constitution?
...what would happen if the current bunch of politically correct leftists in Washington, D.C., were to be granted the power to rewrite our Constitution? It would be the end of the United States of America, and that is no hyperbole. The modern Con Con effort began back in the 1970s. Since then, 32 states have issued the call. The total number of states that are required to enact the Con Con is 34. Simple math reveals that we are only two states short of this disaster. As word of this potential calamity began to surface, the effort stalled with the total states issuing the call stuck at 32. With the election of Barack Obama, however, supporters of a Con Con have been emboldened and are now trying to resurrect the momentum.