It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
A very poorly designed experiment. Let's feed pigs diets from different sources and see what happens. Maybe we can find something.
Animals fed different diets showed different characteristics. Not too surprising really. Were the differences due to the GMO component? No way to tell from the way the experiment was conducted. Apparently there was no actual analysis of the diets. Just an assumption on the part of the experimenters:
gmojudycarman.org...
there should be no phenotypical variation between the GM and non-GM varieties used in this study that could influence the outcomes measured in this study.
An odd statement since there are a number of factors other than genetics involved in phenotypical characteristics in crops. For example, it is known that hormone levels in soybean crops can vary (unrelated to the GMO factor).www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
Soy research is complicated because there’s considerable variation in isoflavone exposure among people classified as soy consumers. Agronomic factors (such as the soybean cultivar and the environmental conditions under which the crop grew) affect a food’s isoflavone profile, as does the way a soy food is processed.
An interesting "Conflict of Interest Statement" in the report too.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
That's a pretty odd thing to see in a scientific article. Pre-emptive denial?
But right after that it says funding came from Verity Farms. Verity Farms is quite openly anti-GMO,
I see no indication that normal variation was accounted for in the statistical analysis but I do see that the non-GMO fed animals had more stomach inflammation overall than the GMO fed animals.
edit on 6/15/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by markosity1973
The biggest problem with GMO foods is that we simply don't know either way whether they cause harm or not.
Can you explain why there is any reason to think that GMO foods might cause harm?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by markosity1973
The biggest problem with GMO foods is that we simply don't know either way whether they cause harm or not.
Can you explain why there is any reason to think that GMO foods might cause harm?
Originally posted by Turq1
I get such a Fox News vibe.
Originally posted by AuranVector
reply to post by Philippines
S&F But of course, I'm one of those people who is convinced TPTB are poisoning us on purpose.
Soft kill towards "The Culling."
Originally posted by Philippines
Originally posted by AuranVector
reply to post by Philippines
S&F But of course, I'm one of those people who is convinced TPTB are poisoning us on purpose.
Soft kill towards "The Culling."
Perhaps this is true. How do you prepare for long term effects of this possibility?
Where does your water come from?
I'm a very skeptical person =D
markosity1973ginally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by markosity1973
horizontal gene transfer is fairly common. the human genome is chock-full of LINE elements and others which did not originate in primates. the problem is that, considering the mechanisms of genomic housekeeping and transcription, the probability of a viable (let alone toxic) transcriptional product is practically unthinkable.
but what you've said here hints at, IMO, one of the few legitimate biological concerns that shoud really be looked at. the focus of molecular biology for decades has been transcription products (proteins). but the fringes of the science have been discovering the profound effect of nucleotide oligomers as transcription factors (epigenetics).
it seems plausible to me that foreign nonsense non-coding sequences of DNA or RNA diffusing through the body (after miraculously remaining intact through the gut) could cause disruptions in genetic regulation as transcription factors. its a long shot, but its worth considering.
Originally posted by tgidkp
Then I unequivocally assure you that you are part of a mass of lemmings.
tell me again: who are the sheeple? the shills?
maybe Ben and Nancy are, like me, sick to death of the rampant stupidity of the anti-gmo crowd?
You're kidding, right? A food that contains its own pesticide is not the slightest reason to be concerned?
Which one?
One of Monsanto's own scientists in the early days was fired
I'm not sure large scale agriculture in any form results in what anyone would call biodiversity but are you sure that there were hundreds of "traditional" hybrids used in large scale agriculture?
A couple of varieties of GMO corn compared to hundreds of traditional ones.
If the studies are flawed and don't demonstrate what people claim they do why is that the case? If a whole lot of people come to the wrong conclusion about something does that make them correct?
they point to the idea that they might be a bad thing.
Originally posted by Metallicus
Monsanto and our corrupt government simply ignore studies like this because they are inconvenient.
The truth is the only way to stop the mass poisoning of the population is to vote with your dollars and avoid all of the products containing this filthy GMO crap.
The good news is that even main stream retailers like Kroger and Wal-mart are now offering a variety of non-gmo products.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
I asked simple questions and, employing that typical shill tactic
you expect "thoughtful" and "courteous" after you write stuff like this...
Yeah right, tampering with the food chain is nothing to worry about. God these people are annoying