It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Rather, a likely culprit is a shift in the mix of full-time workers who will come under ObamaCare's employer mandate and part-time workers who won't.
Employers who offer full-time workers coverage can escape a potential fine of $3,000 per worker if employees work fewer than 30 hours per week.
BLS data, though volatile from month to month, clearly show that retailers have been cutting the average workweek for nonsupervisory employees over the past year.
2) Young people can stay on their parent's coverage longer.
Originally posted by littled16
~snip~
Both niece and her boyfriend work full time and live on their own and pay their own bills, but do not get married just so that she and her child/children can stay on her parents insurance.
~snip~
Your children can join or remain on your plan even if they are:
married
not living with you
attending school
not financially dependent on you
eligible to enroll in their employer’s plan
Your children can join or remain on your plan even if they are:
married
not living with you
attending school
not financially dependent on you
eligible to enroll in their employer’s plan
Lower "group rate" insurance prices? Sounds good to me.
Originally posted by littled16
Other than the clause of attending school makes absolutely no sense to me. If you are married, not living with your parents, not financially dependent on your parents and are eligible and financially able to get insurance through your own employer why on earth should you remain on your parent's insurance?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Lower "group rate" insurance prices? Sounds good to me.
Originally posted by littled16
Other than the clause of attending school makes absolutely no sense to me. If you are married, not living with your parents, not financially dependent on your parents and are eligible and financially able to get insurance through your own employer why on earth should you remain on your parent's insurance?
People with pre-existing conditions cannot be denied coverage. They should be charged market rates though
As Obamacare went into effect, two temporary programs were established in March 2010, the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program and the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) program. Each program is supposed to operate through Dec. 31, 2013, after which their respective enrollees are supposed to transition into the health insurance Exchanges established by Obamacare. Each program was allotted $5 billion.
By the end of January 2013, the GAO found that PCIP spending had reached $2.6 billion, more than half of its $5 billion budget.
Enrollment varied widely. Vermont had 1 enrollee, for example, and California had 15,101.
Further, the CCIIO “instituted benefit changes for the federally run PCIP that shifted more costs onto enrollees starting in January 2013,” reported the GAO. “For example, it increased enrollees’ out of pocket maximum for in-network services from $4,000 to $6,250 and for out-of-network services from $7,000 to $10,000.”
The report concluded, “Finally, due to growing concerns about the rate of PCIP spending, in February 2013, CCIIO suspended PCIP enrollment to ensure the appropriated funding would be sufficient to cover claims for current enrollees through the end of the program.” - See more at: cnsnews.com...
Originally posted by olaru12
Why shouldn't everyone get the same kind of taxpayer funded health care that the congressmen and reps get?
My current health plan dropped me when I reached 55 for the most bogus reasons. I had never even filed a claim. All that money down the rat hole.
Anything would be better than the system in place now.edit on 14-6-2013 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)
Dozens of lawmakers and aides are so afraid that their health insurance premiums will skyrocket next year thanks to Obamacare that they are thinking about retiring early or just quitting. The fear: Government-subsidized premiums will disappear at the end of the year under a provision in the health care law that nudges aides and lawmakers onto the government health care exchanges, which could make their benefits exorbitantly expensive.
Sources said several aides have already given lawmakers notice that they’ll be leaving over concerns about Obamacare. Republican and Democratic lawmakers said the chatter about retiring now, to remain on the current health care plan, is constant. Read more: www.politico.com...
Originally posted by olaru12
reply to post by guohua
Huh?............why the snarky reply? It's just a discussion on the web.
I joined a union so at least I can get some kind of Health insurance provided by the union. Affordable and excellent coverage.
Obamacare allows for you to keep your existing coverage. That's what I plan to do.
healthcarereform.procon.org...edit on 14-6-2013 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)
Pg 72, lines 8-14 creates a Health Care Exchange to bring private health insurance plans under government control. This part of the bill reveals Obama’s lies about being able to keep your plan if you like it. Any health insurance plan which does not completely rework itself to conform to these regulations will be dropped from the exchange and those insured will have to pick one of the plans in the exchange. This is why the Congressional Budget Office determined that over 20 million will lose the coverage they are now enjoying if Obamacare is implemented.
Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by tjack
I'm supposing they are unaware of that, and I will pass the word along as they really do want to get married. I still don't think that they should remain on her parent's insurance when they can well afford their own.
This:
Your children can join or remain on your plan even if they are:
married
not living with you
attending school
not financially dependent on you
eligible to enroll in their employer’s plan
Other than the clause of attending school makes absolutely no sense to me. If you are married, not living with your parents, not financially dependent on your parents and are eligible and financially able to get insurance through your own employer why on earth should you remain on your parent's insurance?
edit on 6/14/13 by littled16 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by kaylaluv
I agree that it's taking advantage of her parents, but she isn't alone. Of everyone I know with adult children still on their insurance NONE of them reimburse the parents for their share of the insurance premiums (none live at home, only one is a college student) and yet they can afford all of the latest electronic gadgets, $100 jeans and shoes and go out nearly every weekend. I think this clause in Obamacare just allows more grown kids to take advantage of their parents, and I think the parents need to cut the apron strings!
Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by DarthMuerte
2) Young people can stay on their parent's coverage longer.
I have a few problems with this part of Obamacare due to a familial situation. My step-niece is pregnant with her second child and is still on her parents insurance. She lives with her boyfriend and her 2 1/2 year old son, who is also on his grandparents insurance. Both niece and her boyfriend work full time and live on their own and pay their own bills, but do not get married just so that she and her child/children can stay on her parents insurance. I don't feel like this was the intended purpose for kids being able to stay on their parent's insurance longer. I may get flamed for that but I feel once you have established your own family, especially with children, and are living on your own and doing well enough that you are receiving no public assistance that you should be getting your own insurance. Maybe I'm wrong but I thought the clause was for parents with kids in college or who were still residing at home.