It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
Not true. Now, I am not saying that it was required that the teachers run at the gunman. Im saying that years and years and years of training teaches teachers that the wellbeing of a student ALWAYS comes before their own.
Her ex-husband was subsequently sent to prison, but in April, the school fired her anyway.
Maybe this school should have done the humane thing and given her a PAID leave of absence,
reply to post by ElohimJD
I am curious, do lawful termination laws apply the same in both public and private school environments? I do not know, but it might play a factor.
There's a world of difference between ensuring well being and tackling gunmen or facing termination because some acquaintance or even a completely anonymous lunatic threatened you.
no, because there would be no clear and imminent threat. Now, if you showed up in the parking lot saying you were going to kill me, I WOULD ask for a leave of absence (not resign, I never said resign) until the issue was dealt with.
That begs a question. If I call your place of work and threaten you by name as a teacher would you resign for the children?
Explained in the previous statement.
You dont know me. You have gauge by which to measure the severity or sincerity of the threat but you have to keep those kids safe, right?
Like I already said, once the thread has subsided, the RIGHT thing to do would be to reinstate her.
Oh, I believe I read her ex is in jail now. Threat subsided?
Ive seen differing reports on this. Some say he is in jail now. Some say he went in april. i would need to know the exact details of that to give further judgement.
Looks like they didnt fire her until he went to prison
The difference being, you were threatened based on doing your job (it is actually a legal requirement in most places for teachers to report abuse), while in the scenario in the OP it was not connected to the school at all. It was her personal life interfering with her ability to do her job.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Originally posted by kosmicjack
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
But if she has a threat to her own personal safety, then those in her immediate vicinity are also unsafe, in this case, children, who have been entrusted to her care and who look to her to protect them. How can she reasonably do that if she is also afraid enough to alert the school administrators to the possibility of him showing up and also file a restraining order against him?
Kosmicjack, I dearly love you, but I have to disagree.
I once had a parent threaten to kill me after I reported him for abuse (mandated reporting is supposed to be anonymous, but he figured it out). He threatened to come to school and "shoot the place up."
According to the logic I've seen in this thread, my prescience posed a danger to the kids. Should I have lost my job? It's the same thing, IMO.
This is a tough decision, everyone obviously wants the best for the children.
That makes the conversation all the more interesting.
Originally posted by AshleyD
Great arguments from all you guys on both sides of the discussion.
Everyone is bringing up really great points.
For those wondering about his jail sentence, I read in one of the articles that he is due to be released by the end of the month.
It is definitely a failure in our system. It is sad that the teacher has to pay and the school has to take the brunt of the criticism when in reality it is the dunce of a husband who caused the problems and the loose laws that gave him a slap on the wrist.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
I see a lawsuit brewing. Her termination wasn't work related, the school had no right to fire her.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Originally posted by kosmicjack
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
But if she has a threat to her own personal safety, then those in her immediate vicinity are also unsafe, in this case, children, who have been entrusted to her care and who look to her to protect them. How can she reasonably do that if she is also afraid enough to alert the school administrators to the possibility of him showing up and also file a restraining order against him?
Kosmicjack, I dearly love you, but I have to disagree.
I once had a parent threaten to kill me after I reported him for abuse (mandated reporting is supposed to be anonymous, but he figured it out). He threatened to come to school and "shoot the place up."
According to the logic I've seen in this thread, my prescience posed a danger to the kids. Should I have lost my job? It's the same thing, IMO.
This is a tough decision, everyone obviously wants the best for the children.
reply to post by Realtruth
When there is a convicted felon, or someone on trial for domestic violence, and they show up at a place with young children there are a whole litany or rules, laws, and judgments that can, and will be applied. Most felons can not be anywhere on school grounds, due to many school policies and state laws. (Check your local laws and Policies)
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by Realtruth
When there is a convicted felon, or someone on trial for domestic violence, and they show up at a place with young children there are a whole litany or rules, laws, and judgments that can, and will be applied. Most felons can not be anywhere on school grounds, due to many school policies and state laws. (Check your local laws and Policies)
Then call the police and have him rearrested. Those Laws that keep felons off school property? Lets enforce them. The minute he shows up, arrest him.
But to take away this woman's income because of a possible threat.....I don't agree.
Originally posted by Auricom
reply to post by AshleyD
Terribly sad but totally understandable. The schools number one job is to keep the children safe,