HOT (Latest update for Glenn Beck Scandal) Rumor: Glenn Beck; NSA Used to Blackmail Chief Justice Ro

Originally posted by Pladuim
 Beck said on the radio this morning that his "Breaking News" was about the 70 Republicans standing up to the immigration bill. I'd like to know why the whistle blower was in such fear of his life? Did Beck just drop the story? Did he loose his source? He called everyone a bunch of dopes for not realizing the immigration bill thing was his breaking news. This whole thing just doesn't seem right.

Pladuim

I know. I used to be a big Beck follower until he started sounding like he had severe ADD, jumping all over the place, not following up on his supposedly big breaking stories. I've left the door cracked open for him, but he isn't bringing much to entice me to open it for him.

Des

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


I'm not sure what your reply to me is on this for? Another poster stated Tea Party people were Anarchists. That 's what my reply was to. One of the more ...ill informed statements that I've heard in awhile. (To find a mild term to use).

Now I really strongly dislike communists..to my core. Socialists aren't the same thing, but cousins and that's text book, right out of the definitions. The thing is, I can also work aside and with either one of those and I have. I don't much like them and they don't much like me as it's come in real life...but when the cause is worth it, those things can be put aside. Communists/Socialists aren't anarchists. Quite the opposite, of course. The true believers in burning the whole place down? I'd call it an uneasy tolerance since we had to share space and everyone realized there was 0 profit for infighting in that situation. Uneasy though..and never turning my back entirely.

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by jimmyx

 

if substantiated????......all tea party members are anarchists, and bent on overthrowing the government, if substantiated, that would be big news too!!!

You..uhh..don't get out much, do you? I was around honest to God anarchists and Black Block people with Occupy. The first time I'd ever been around true believers to that mindset and world view, too. They were all ..interesting people. I'll give them that. I'd also term a few as among the most dangerous people I've run across for world view and willingness to do whatever it took, over top of whoever it had to happen on for their end goals.

Having ALSO been around a couple different groups of Tea Party people? I can assure you without question or qualification. Those two groups have ABSOLUTELY nothing in common for philosophy or approach beyond perhaps saying they both think the current Government has to go. Tea Party people want to reform it. Anarchists and Black Block would be happy, as I heard them actually say, if Washington D.C. was nuked with everyone in it.

We kid about that here sometimes...but these people were intense and dead serious while saying that. Not so much as a glint of humor or sarcasm. Nope.... Tea Party and Anarchists have little to nothing in common.

actually, what I was trying to point out was the use of the word "substantiated"....as in, anything can be true... "IF IT IS SUBSTANTIATED"....a truth should already be substantiated, or it's not the truth, it's speculation.
back in the late sixties, when I was 17, I overheard a supposed member of the SDS, speaking about violent actions against the government at the time, and he was crazy serious. I made sure I didn't have any contact with him again, he just had that look on his face.

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


The tea party is not anarchist. I agree with you 100% and further defended many of the "smaller parties" that are also NOT anarchist. Both D and R use the term "anarchist" loosely and to be honest it offends me because it is an outright lie they are feeding the gullible masses.



Only a handful of small networks broadcast the "third party" debate because obviously it goes against the status quo and they cannot have it.

reply to post by Destinyone


I listen to Beck from time to time on Sirius Radio but he is really starting to loose me too. I was never a big fan, and now after this I'm sure I'll be listening to something else. I'm sure many will start dropping their Blaze subscription over this. I wonder how the other hosts on the Blaze will handle the situation?

Pladuim

Really. WHERE is this "Bombshell'?
Sometimes, it feels as if Beck's show is becoming an endless parade of commercials, book plugs and empty hype.
It's sad, because I want to believe.

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

I'm not sure what your reply to me is on this for? Another poster stated Tea Party people were Anarchists. That 's what my reply was to. One of the more ...ill informed statements that I've heard in awhile. (To find a mild term to use).

Now I really strongly dislike communists..to my core. Socialists aren't the same thing, but cousins and that's text book, right out of the definitions. The thing is, I can also work aside and with either one of those and I have. I don't much like them and they don't much like me as it's come in real life...but when the cause is worth it, those things can be put aside. Communists/Socialists aren't anarchists. Quite the opposite, of course. The true believers in burning the whole place down? I'd call it an uneasy tolerance since we had to share space and everyone realized there was 0 profit for infighting in that situation. Uneasy though..and never turning my back entirely.

c'mon, wrabbit...I was using that AS AN EXAMPLE!!!....I didn't call tea party people anarchists...what's wrong with you?...and now your using me as "another poster"???

reply to post by captaintyinknots


If Glenn Beck comes up with substantial proof it will be the first time ever!
GB is blackmailing true with hopeful fantasy as usual.

reply to post by jimmyx

Okay, that's fair. You didn't mean it the way it came across. I'm fine with that then. Perhaps one more sentence to the start or finish would have put it into the context you intended? I went back and read it again..and it still reads the same to me. You say that wasn't the intent though, so fine by me. I'll take you at your word and move on.

I am not surprised if this is true. I have intuitively thought this for a long time....

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


I have to admit to being a Paul supporter myself. I wrote him into the General election in 2008 and supported him all I could from my limited means in 2012, up to the point where he simply didn't have the math to have any chance at all. How all that came about for the dirty tricks involved at some stages is another matter...and he would have lost anyway, as it became obvious in hindsight to the numbers. The republican party wasn't content with simply letting him lose honorably though. They had to cheat him of even that. It's something I'm not sure I'll ever forgive the GOP for.

I've really never looked at the 3rd parties. It's not because they may not be exactly what I'd like. They may well have some real winners in there. The math is just flat impossible though. Perot came as close as anyone ever has ...but calling him an outsider is a real stretch, too. Unaffiliated to the two main parties may have been a better description for Perot...and I'm glad he lost, actually. He was worse with security checks and bird dogging his own people than Obama has yet gotten with the whole federal government to use.

I wish our system wasn't 110% stacked against a 3rd party and making it near on impossible by sheer numbers...but there it is and they sure do, don't they?

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

I have to admit to being a Paul supporter myself. I wrote him into the General election in 2008 and supported him all I could from my limited means in 2012, up to the point where he simply didn't have the math to have any chance at all. How all that came about for the dirty tricks involved at some stages is another matter...and he would have lost anyway, as it became obvious in hindsight to the numbers. The republican party wasn't content with simply letting him lose honorably though. They had to cheat him of even that. It's something I'm not sure I'll ever forgive the GOP for.

Ron Paul got cheated severly otherwise I think he had a good chance of beating Mitt Romney, gotten the republican nomination to run against Barrack Obama and THEN probably beaten Barrack Obama. I think the ptb literally threw every single trick against Ron Paul with new laws at the last second as pure desperation. Mitt Romney even paid people to attend his campaigns and then literally BOUGHT DELEGATES at the primaries.

I've really never looked at the 3rd parties. It's not because they may not be exactly what I'd like. They may well have some real winners in there. The math is just flat impossible though. Perot came as close as anyone ever has ...but calling him an outsider is a real stretch, too. Unaffiliated to the two main parties may have been a better description for Perot...and I'm glad he lost, actually. He was worse with security checks and bird dogging his own people than Obama has yet gotten with the whole federal government to use.

I wish our system wasn't 110% stacked against a 3rd party and making it near on impossible by sheer numbers...but there it is and they sure do, don't they?

Yes the game is rigged beyond belief and people FEAR voting "third party"(damm I hate that phrase).

However once such party gets 5% of the popular total vote then that party also receives matching funds and the ptb cannot ignore that party like they do now. The "small parties" cannot compete with the "big parties" because they do not get campaign contributions from the ptb. They relly on small time sponsors which is almost a lost cause.

I have faith because that is the only thing left to have. Or we need rand paul, or we need a bloody revolution. Something needs to happen soon though.

If this turns out to be true can we have the revolution now?

But wait, this comes from Beck? GLENN Beck? The douche who fails Godwin's Law and whips out Hitler every chance he gets? THAT guy?! *facepalm* Whenever I think of Glenn Beck I think of this:



As nice as it would be if this was the straw that broke the country's back...the odds of Glenn Beck giving that to us I'd say are less than zero. But...I will be happy to eat crow if I'm wrong.

Originally posted by lucid eyes
Wouldnt surprise me. In every liberal there is a totalitarian screaming to get out.

In every partisan hack there is some kind of hyperbole waiting to break free. You're not helping.

Why is everyone in this thread simply killing the messenger here.

We have seen in the last 3-4 weeks that spying and intimidation are rampant. How could we not believe or even allow the suspicion that this is true.

You have people running scared from the administration, the ones who lie getting better jobs and things like this confirmed...

Link

A cyber security firm hired by CBS News has determined through forensic analysis that Sharyl Attkisson’s computer was accessed by an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions late in 2012. Evidence suggests this party performed all access remotely using Attkisson’s accounts. While no malicious code was found, forensic analysis revealed an intruder had executed commands that appeared to involve search and exfiltration of data.

We are all suspects not until proven guilty but until we are used for what is needed or suppressed.

Originally posted by esdad71
Why is everyone in this thread simply killing the messenger here.

Because the messenger rode in on a lame donkey, and seems to have lost the message he was supposed to be delivering.

Beck is a self-serving BS merchant, not unlike Alex Jones - plenty of hyperbole and wild theories, and not a shred of actual evidence to base ANY of it on.

They give all real conspiracy theorists a bad name.

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by spyder550

 

Let me know WHERE you and muse7 find gary johnson and the libertarians equating to anarchy and somalia.

It helps to be knowledgeable when you talk about something so you don't sound stupid.

I'd probably start here (from wiki)

Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be immoral, or alternatively as opposing authority in the conduct of human relations. Proponents of anarchism (known as "anarchists") advocate stateless societies based on what sometimes is defined like non-hierarchical organizations, and in another times is defined like voluntary associations.

reply to post by Xnibiru


I like Beck but he is a bit sensationalistic at times. I'll wait and see.

Originally posted by spyder550

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by spyder550

 

Let me know WHERE you and muse7 find gary johnson and the libertarians equating to anarchy and somalia.

It helps to be knowledgeable when you talk about something so you don't sound stupid.

I'd probably start here (from wiki)

Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be immoral, or alternatively as opposing authority in the conduct of human relations. Proponents of anarchism (known as "anarchists") advocate stateless societies based on what sometimes is defined like non-hierarchical organizations, and in another times is defined like voluntary associations.

And what does that have anything to do with the tea party or the libertarian party or any political system at all? It doesn't! I already know what anarchy is. According to the communist manifesto it is the direct method to achieve communism which is a stateless and classless society. Marxism is the indirect method to achieve communism via socialism.

Glenn Beck just got blackmailed....if he doesn't shut up, he'll be "breitbarted"... he knows this...and, if he had this news about the blackmailing of a supreme, he should have just put it out there, and not announced the announcement...so...as usual...something's fishy in Denmark....or the USA again.........

Found this on Glen Becks facebook page.

John Kirkwood ATTENTION: GLENN BECK HATERS/DENIERS/I'LL NEVER TRUST/LISTEN TO HIM AGAIN "SO-CALLED" CONSERVATIVES - YOU ALL HAVE BEEN HAD BY A LEFTIST GROUP "RIGHT WING WATCH" and you're acting quite pathetic. I'm astounded at the number of "conservatives" who have been conned by this and of conservative blogs/pages/sites that are openly mocking Glenn Beck while they continue to bear false witness. Shameful!If you listened to yesterday's show hoping to hear evidence about a whistle-blower with a document that would "pull the whole structure down" then you are of all men, most miserable; but it isn't Glenn's fault ... it's yours! Glenn never said it. Oh, I know you heard it in a video but go back and look at that video and you'll see that there's a splice in it between the :52 and :53 second. That's right, they cut out about 4 minutes of the actual show. You can hear what he really said by going to his page and listening to the first ten minutes of Wednesday's show. Media Matters does this to Rush Limbaugh all the time.Glenn even talked about Salon getting this wrong in the first 5 minutes of the pre-show on Thursday. The video was spliced and headlined to make it seem that Glenn was going to share the whistle-blower evidence within the next 24 hours but the parts they cut out clearly show that Glenn was talking about revealing details about a revolt in Congress by tea-party Republicans against the establishment regarding IMMIGRATION REFORM, and he did do that on the Thursday Show. The part that RIGHT WING WATCH (a Leftist hate group) cut out of their video, shows Glenn, Pat and Stu transitioning in their dialogue from Immigration to the Whistle-blower. Glenn clearly says that he's working with the Senate to ensure protection for the Whistle-blower so he can publicly come forward. IT'S IN THE FIRST TEN MINUTES OF HIS WEDNESDAY SHOW and the first 5 minutes of the Thursday pre-show. If you didn't listen or don't have access as a subscriber then you can hear both of these on our show that's posted here. I'm amazed at the willingness of conservatives to:Believe a doctored tape with a clear splice made by the leftist RIGHT WING WATCH and the sheer laziness in checking facts before spouting off like you're a master of them. THAT'S WHAT LIBERALS DO!Here is our show; we talk about it in the first few segments and we play the audio to prove it:uncommonshow.com... Show Webcast – June 13, 2013 :: UnCommon Showuncommonshow.com 

Pladuim