It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
^^^^ twice the altitude of 7600m would be 15200m and Everest is only 8500m high!!But the US are welcome to try a land a heli on the peak of Mount Everest!!
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
Originally posted by Daedalus3
^^^^ twice the altitude of 7600m would be 15200m and Everest is only 8500m high!!But the US are welcome to try a land a heli on the peak of Mount Everest!!
Ok then,i used the word twice loosely,but whats the point of this record anyway?For fun or what?
Originally posted by Unnamed_One
Sad. Instead of spending money on stuff like "being the best" on something, provide the people with food first.
I know that someone said this already but if Pakistan or some other country attacks India, the UN is always there to back them up.
Airforce? Whatever, man. For me, the only countries that should boost their military force are those countries that can already feed their people. Don't tell me that you're going to blame the obscene population in India for having insufficient food. That's just really pathetic.
Originally posted by Unnamed_One
Sad. Instead of spending money on stuff like "being the best" on something, provide the people with food first.
I know that someone said this already but if Pakistan or some other country attacks India, the UN is always there to back them up.
Airforce? Whatever, man. For me, the only countries that should boost their military force are those countries that can already feed their people. Don't tell me that you're going to blame the obscene population in India for having insufficient food. That's just really pathetic.
Originally posted by Killak420
The UN is there to back who up India or Pakistan?
Originally posted by Killak420
Originally posted by Unnamed_One
Sad. Instead of spending money on stuff like "being the best" on something, provide the people with food first.
I know that someone said this already but if Pakistan or some other country attacks India, the UN is always there to back them up.
Airforce? Whatever, man. For me, the only countries that should boost their military force are those countries that can already feed their people. Don't tell me that you're going to blame the obscene population in India for having insufficient food. That's just really pathetic.
Okay then I guess the US should be one of those country's to provide food for the people first. After all the US has the Largest poverty and crime rate in the developed world.
[edit on 19-11-2004 by Killak420]
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Originally posted by Killak420
Originally posted by Unnamed_One
Sad. Instead of spending money on stuff like "being the best" on something, provide the people with food first.
I know that someone said this already but if Pakistan or some other country attacks India, the UN is always there to back them up.
Airforce? Whatever, man. For me, the only countries that should boost their military force are those countries that can already feed their people. Don't tell me that you're going to blame the obscene population in India for having insufficient food. That's just really pathetic.
Okay then I guess the US should be one of those country's to provide food for the people first. After all the US has the Largest poverty and crime rate in the developed world.
[edit on 19-11-2004 by Killak420]
That is a lie - the UK has a higher violent crime rate then the US and the US poverty rate is a higher standard of living then that in Europe. Get your facts staight buddy
Originally posted by W4rl0rD
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Originally posted by Killak420
Originally posted by Unnamed_One
Sad. Instead of spending money on stuff like "being the best" on something, provide the people with food first.
I know that someone said this already but if Pakistan or some other country attacks India, the UN is always there to back them up.
Airforce? Whatever, man. For me, the only countries that should boost their military force are those countries that can already feed their people. Don't tell me that you're going to blame the obscene population in India for having insufficient food. That's just really pathetic.
Okay then I guess the US should be one of those country's to provide food for the people first. After all the US has the Largest poverty and crime rate in the developed world.
[edit on 19-11-2004 by Killak420]
That is a lie - the UK has a higher violent crime rate then the US and the US poverty rate is a higher standard of living then that in Europe. Get your facts staight buddy
Number of murders in USA in a year - 15,586
Numbers of murders in Germany in a year - 300+
Numbers of murders in UK in a year - 250+
Numbers of murders in Japan in a year - 60+
Get your facts right buddy,i got the Bowling for Columbine VCD at home right now
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Wishfull thinking by yet another US hater. The US economy is growing faster in both % and in GDP then the UK, Russia, France, Germany - hell, any major country really.
We are still expanding faster then China as well. China might be making the largest improvement in % growth, but since the US economy is soooooo much bigger, even if we have half the % growth the total growth is still higher, which means we still increase our budget lead over China.
Originally posted by jetsetterAs I said, if you know the specifics. The Indians flew with AWACS. That is advantage that is very hard to beat. The US did not.
Originally posted by just_a_pilotIf I am not mistaken, we ( U.S.A.) feed your people first.
Originally posted by Argus
...The past four years of this administration have seen a Clinton gained budget surplus eroded into a $500 billion dollar a year budget defecit. In fact, Mr Bush has just approved the borrowing of a further $800 billion dollars!!!