It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
reply to post by FlyersFan
they told him not to follow him and he said ok. or does george have amnesia about that too? does he also have amnesia that a neighborhood watch person is not supposed to follow or carry a firearm? isn't that the excuse he has for being such a busy body, that he was neighborhood watch?
Originally posted by muse7
So let me get this straight....
Trayvon Martin was walking through a gated community...George Zimmerman decides to follow him while carrying a gun with him...the 911 dispatcher advises Zimmerman not to follow but he follows trayvon anyway...the two get into a fight...a fight that could have been prevented if Zimmerman had controlled himself and not followed martin. and now Trayvon martin is dead.
How George Zimmerman can claim he killed martin in self defense is beyond me really. It was him that instigated the fight and he ended the fight by killing Martin.
I hope they lock up this POS for a long time.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
reply to post by FlyersFan
as neighborhood watch HE WAS ONLY SUPPOSED TO REPORT. HE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW OR BE ARMED!
From the angry mobs threatening to riot if there is no conviction. We saw the same thing in reverse in the OJ trial…innocent verdict out of fear IMO.
retribution from what?
I knew it too but I still have a problem with moving the goal post in the middle of the game. If the prosecution thought this was manslaughter then it shouldn’t have brought murder charges.
every one posting in this thread knew all along that manslaughter would most likely be on the table.
It’s not negligence to defend yourself.
if the jury finds him guilty of manslaughter so be it. trayvon would never been killed if it wasn't for zimmermans negligent actions.
He was under no obligation to stop following…this is still a free country (I think).
he never should have followed trayvon, he did his neighborhood watch duties and called the police. he should have let the police do their job and checked out the "suspicious" person. they would have found trayvon, realized he was unarmed and not committing any crime and went about there way. instead he was emboldened by his gun that gave him the guts to play super hero and go and look for trayvon even after the police dispatcher told him not to follow trayvon. neighborhood watch members are not supposed to follow and they are not supposed to be armed.
My opinion has always been that no charges should have been filed and that certain groups (including Eric Holder’s DOJ) put pressure on the state to bring these trumped up charges.
my opinion has always been that zimmerman should be charged with manslaughter. i will respect the jurys decision in that it could be argued, although i dont believe so, that zimmerman feared that he was going to be "beaten to death" and acted in self defense that he had to kill trayvon or be killed himself
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
HE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW OR BE ARMED!
Originally posted by beatbox
Why is it that a majority of of those who think this dude is innocent is white? But it's not race related?
Why is it okay to stump on the civil right of a young black man who was simply walking home one night?
Why is it okay for Zimmerman to shoot this kid out of protection, but it's not okay for the young man to protect himself?
Why is it okay to paint this 17 year old as a weed smoking thug, but not okay to paint Zimmerman with the title of a grown repeated offender?
Why are we letting White America dictate to us what is and what is not acceptable behavior of our young black youth?
Why isn't there more protection for the innocent and all the protection in the world for the guilty.
If aqquited what message is this really sending to black America? That we can change gun laws when some madman shoots up a school full of white children, but look the other way when a madman shoots a black kid down in the streets, because the gunman didn't feel he belonged there.........further more the young man deserved to be questioned by the gunman because his actions of being in the wrong place at the wrong time were more then enough reason for him to die........
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
Originally posted by muse7
So let me get this straight....
Trayvon Martin was walking through a gated community...George Zimmerman decides to follow him while carrying a gun with him...the 911 dispatcher advises Zimmerman not to follow but he follows trayvon anyway...the two get into a fight...a fight that could have been prevented if Zimmerman had controlled himself and not followed martin. and now Trayvon martin is dead.
How George Zimmerman can claim he killed martin in self defense is beyond me really. It was him that instigated the fight and he ended the fight by killing Martin.
I hope they lock up this POS for a long time.
pretty much my sentiments. we are entitled to our opinions, if the jury finds him not guilty on all counts so be it. if he is convicted people on this thread will probably have a panic attack.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
they keep saying that following is not illegal, but as a neighborhood watch person zimmerman was not supposed to be following especially while armed.
784.048 Stalking; definitions; penalties.—
2) A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(3) A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person and makes a credible threat to that person commits the offense of aggravated stalking, a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
that is a joke, i could name all the streets in my immediate neighborhood. you guys just want to believe everything zimmerman says no matter what, even though he gave numerous inconsistent statements, like trayvon jumped out of the bushes and travon said whats your problem homey?
Originally posted by conspiracy nut
i can live with myself whether zimmerman gets convicted or not, some people on here sound like they are the ones that will be rioting if he gets convicted. i think you guys might have the super hero wannabe cop gene in you and i hope if he is found not guilty it doesn't open up the floodgates for zimmerman wannabes to go out taking the law into their own hands following people who are not in fact committing crimes.