It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XTexan
I don't think either one of them were out to kill anyone that night. It was a complicated situation, I'm sure. Honestly it comes down to who threw the first punch. I think Martin did sadly, simply because at 17... thats what I would have done, and I'm sure many others would have to.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by JuniorDisco
I never said I was a blogger did I? I don't blog. I write (short stories/novels).
You're question is convoluted and it sounds like you had a misunderstood something, but are insisting on following through. To answer your ridiculous question though.. I had no idea that people were insinuating that Martin's parents had given up the possibility of a criminal trial in exchange for money. Why do you think I would know if some person insinuated that, or why they did?
They wouldn't have any control over that, but I think they (along with their attorney) did coerce Rachel into giving false information so they could settle their civil case. They didn't tell Rachel that she would eventually have to go to the stand in the criminal case (where she would be torn apart). She said herself that she never thought it would go that far.
I am sure there are some people that have taken Zimmerman's side from the start, and blindly so, but what is the relevance? There have been far more people that blindly defended Trayvon (all the way up to the president) without the facts being in. Trayvon's parents made themselves look like profiteers and Trayvon may have been an idiot as you stated, but he was also well on his way to being a seasoned thug as evidenced by perpetual drug abuse, regular assaults and fighting, having a gun he couldn't legally carry outside his home straw purchased for him, being caught with burglary tools and stolen items (which likely came from a house burglarized a few blocks from his school if you investigate for yourself). It is also very possible that he was in a disassociated state from drinking "watermelon leans" which he had 2 of the ingredients for in a bag while walking and had recently talked about using on facebook.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
As to Martin's parents 'looking like profiteers', I'd encourage you to find one piece of actual evidence that they have made money from his death.
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Did the state just call George a camel?
That's gotta be a mistrial, right there.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
Did the state just call George a camel?
That's gotta be a mistrial, right there.
The state said 'the straw that broke the camels back'. I suppose you could say that the state called him a camel ... but common sense says it's just a phrase used. I can't see a mistrial on that ...
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
If George wanting to be a cop is only a good thing, what is O Mara trying so hard to hide?
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
How can it be a smear bringing up that he wanted to be a cop? I thought that was a fine, upstanding career choice?
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
It is far from irrelevant that he might have a familiarity with how to field a police interview,
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Trayvon Martin is NOT on trial. He is the victim of the charge of Murder 2. His past is irrelevant.
Zimmerman IS on trial. He is the defendant of the Murder 2 charge.
His past (if it helps make the State's case) is relevant.