posted on Feb, 23 2015 @ 04:18 PM
originally posted by: Helious
If David Icke is ever right it's purely by accident. I find much of what he says interesting but he has little to nothing to back up the vast
majority of his speculation outside of his personal feeling and flimsy testimony from questionable sources.
Some of what he says could and probably is relevant information but how can one be expected to pick through all the other stuff he puts out that is
pure crap to cherry pick that information?
I like his "Problem > Reaction > Solution" theory. I actually have no idea if he noticed it on his own but he was the first person I heard put it
quite that way. It makes a lot of sense. I agree he goes off the chart weird sometimes and I just can't follow him where he goes when he does
Really, what is needed is someone who can listen to all of these people and pick through it and find the good stuff. There's way too much of it for
everyone who's interested to do it all on their own. Most people just don't have the attention span that would be required, for one thing. For
another, it's unreasonable to expect everyone to be able to sort it all out. There's so much complete nonsense and crazy talk from just one guy like
David Icke it's unbelievable.