It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
I would go along with the investigations carried out by Dr James E McDonald and his conclusions, as yet there has been no proof that ET intelligences do NOT exist and poses the technology so advanced it is very hard to perceive it at our present scientific understandings.The ET hypothesis is a valid and credible one until proven other wise.
How does one show proof of something that doesn't exists? I believe that is an logical fallacy...
I say that 600 pounds purple flying hippos exists and they do until you can prove that they don't... hehe
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
No ,how do those who claim that something does not exits because there is no proof prove that it does not exist.
The ET hypothesis is valid because well all perceive it is very possible that ET intelligences exist , now those that refute any thing that falls into a credible possibility must by their refuting prove that a possibility is redundant.
There are more stars,(suns), in this universe than there are grains of sands on the earth, now by that monumental thesis alone where is the evidence that ET intelligence is not POSSIBLE , now how can you by any scientific reasoning try and equate your "600 pounds purple flying hippos" with a credible possibility over a non credible one.It is very,very important to see what credible data is showing us and not what we want or choose to see,he,he.
First 2 looks nothing like the Colares incident, if you think they all look similar I hope no one goes to you for medical advice. Kind of amusing how you're matching symptoms by descriptive words, but not using images.
All of them had suffered lesions to the face or the thoracic area. [The lesions]… began with intense reddening of the skin in the affected area. Later the hair would fall out and the skin would turn black. There was no pain, only a slight warmth.
Also known as ‘sacred fire’ and ‘invisible fire,’ St Anthony’s Fire is a medieval disease that was given it’s name from one of the key symptoms. In some iterations of the disease the sufferer’s skin blisters and turns black, as if burned by fire, but with no associated pain.
Anyone struck by the beam would relate an extreme burning sensation and feel weak and lethargic. Many simply fainted.
Also known as ‘sacred fire’ and ‘invisible fire,’ St Anthony’s Fire is a medieval disease that was given it’s name from one of the key symptoms. In some iterations of the disease the sufferer’s skin blisters and turns black, as if burned by fire, but with no associated pain.
Originally posted by peashooter
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
What's your point, that the military (who aren't from the town) also suffered the same illness as the rest of the villages? Everyone was eating rye? They captured footage of the lights... how is that possible with hallucinations?
Here I'll list my point:
Your suggestion (assumption) : whole village sick with St. Anthony's fire
Why it doesn't make sense:
1. everyone hallucinates the same thing, lights in the sky. Hallucinations are specific to the individual, right?
2. military also hallucinating, but captured the hallucination on camera. (the lights)
3. doctors have no clue what's causing the symptoms, not even a guess.
4. you forgot that only 35 people had these symptoms, the rest of the village also saw the lights (assuming your argument how does that make sense? if they didn't get St. Anthony's Fire they wouldn't hallucinate right?)
Yep, that's my lack of logic for you.
Your only argument about St. Anthony's fire being painless contradicts the entire case of Colares.
Yes, let's recap because you simply did not read this: (way to pick what you want to read )
These 2 sentences are identical? Nope, they aren't
Anyone struck by the beam would relate an extreme burning sensation and feel weak and lethargic. Many simply fainted.
Also known as ‘sacred fire’ and ‘invisible fire,’ St Anthony’s Fire is a medieval disease that was given it’s name from one of the key symptoms. In some iterations of the disease the sufferer’s skin blisters and turns black, as if burned by fire, but with no associated pain.
"Extreme burning sensation" does not mean painless, nice try again.
If you're suggesting a possibility for other cases, yes we get your point, but you keep pinning random illnesses on this case when it's clearly not related. Please tell me your point in one sentence.
It is very clear who is in denial here I rest my case.edit on 16-6-2013 by peashooter because: (no reason given)
you are text book case on psychological projection.
because you simply did not read this: (way to pick what you want to read )
The common name for ergotism is "St. Anthony's Fire",[10] in reference to monks who cared for victims as well as symptoms, such as severe burning sensations in the limbs
Anyone struck by the beam would relate an extreme burning sensation and feel weak and lethargic. Many simply fainted
symptoms, such as severe burning sensations in the limbs
nausea, seizures, and unconsciousness
the sufferer’s skin blisters and turns black, as if burned by fire, but with no associated pain.
began with intense reddening of the skin in the affected area. Later the hair would fall out and the skin would turn black. There was no pain, only a slight warmth.
appear dazed, be unable to speak or have other forms of paralysis or tremors
Originally posted by mbkennel
reply to post by ZetaRediculian
Herpes Zoster (shingles) certainly causes pain, in contrast to the medieval disease discussed.
The common name for ergotism is "St. Anthony's Fire",[10] in reference to monks who cared for victims as well as symptoms, such as severe burning sensations in the limbs
I said "there is ET visiting"
Oh wait I remember your logical argument: straw man... straw man.. (heard that many times)
Intellectually maddening? Throughout this thread all you have contributed is "dragons, straw man, a suggestion for Ergotism(for everyone involved, even the government)" Where is the intellect in this
1. When I bring up logical explanations on military seeing and documenting the sightings, where's your response to that?
2. How about the fact that everyone, including people who don't have skin symptoms, all hallucinating the SAME thing? Nope? No answer to that?
What's your medical explanation for the above 2 points
,please answer in ONE line. (not 3 posts with no valid argument again, ONE post would suffice, thanks)
Originally posted by Jefferton
First serious post.
So many people believe this to be true. They can't understand why others don't believe.
Is there even on scrap of evidence to prove it? I wanted to believe for so long. But over the years the fakes have killed my belief. How do you still believe??edit on 10-6-2013 by Jefferton because: (no reason given)edit on 10-6-2013 by Jefferton because: (no reason given)
the same woman who stole two photographs (one showing three rhesus monkies in G-suits, and the other showing a rather corny and poorly fabricated fake “flying saucer”, in a hanger) which had been sent out to area newspapers by the Army Air Force Intelligence P.I.O., Walter Haut, in the initial Roswell Hoax.
Originally posted by doobydoll
Originally posted by Jefferton
First serious post.
So many people believe this to be true. They can't understand why others don't believe.
Is there even on scrap of evidence to prove it? I wanted to believe for so long. But over the years the fakes have killed my belief. How do you still believe??
I believe UFO's are alien because of the sharp, angular turns they do whilst at ridiculous speeds.
A human being would just be a red, bloody smear on the craft's walls doing those kinds of manouvers, surely?