posted on Jun, 13 2013 @ 12:42 AM
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Works in horseshoes and nuclear weapons.
Almost just right.
You said that and I addressed it already
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Re: slight "flaw" or apparent imperfection (yet very nearly absolutely "perfect")
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
The God Theory"The God Theory" by Bernard Haisch
Haisch is an astrophysicist whose professional positions include Staff Scientist at the Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory, Deputy
Director for the Center for Extreme Ultraviolet Astrophysics at the University of California, Berkeley, and Visiting Fellow at the Max-Planck
Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany. His work has led to close involvement with NASA; he is the author of over 130 scientific
papers; and was the Scientific Editor of the Astrophysical Journal for nine years, as well as the editor in chief of the Journal of Scientific
If you think of white light as a metaphor of infinite, formless potential, the colors on a slide or frame of film become a structured reality grounded
in the polarity that comes about through intelligent subtraction from that absolute formless potential. It results from the limitation of the
unlimited. I contend that this metaphor provides a comprehensible theory for the creation of a manifest reality (our universe) from the selective
limitation of infinite potential (God)...
If there exists an absolute realm that consists of infinite potential out of which a created realm of polarity emerges, is there any sensible reason
not to call this "God"? Or to put it frankly, if the absolute is not God, what is it? For our purposes here, I will identify the Absolute with God.
More precisely I will call the Absolute the Godhead. Applying this new terminology to the optics analogy, we can conclude that our physical universe
comes about when the Godhead selectively limits itself, taking on the role of Creator and manifesting a realm of space and time and, within that
realm, filtering out some of its own infinite potential...
Viewed this way, the process of creation is the exact opposite of making something out of nothing. It is, on the contrary, a filtering process
that makes something out of everything. Creation is not capricious or random addition; it is intelligent and selective subtraction. The
implications of this are profound.
If the Absolute is the Godhead, and if creation is the process by which the Godhead filters out parts of its own infinite potential to manifest a
physical reality that supports experience, then the stuff that is left over, the residue of this process, is our physical universe, and
ourselves included. We are nothing less than a part of that Godhead - quite literally.
More @ Brilliant Disguise: Light, Matter and the Zero-Point Field.(MUST READ!)
But Phage, we don't have to have the very same debate all over again, over here, do we? Like I said, I was looking for some like-minded people with
which to share some ideas about intelligent design without coming under attack by people with a strong atheist agenda. C'mon. Please? Why can't I talk
to and share ideas with Masons about ID what's wrong with that?
And by perfect reflection, it's the same visible circumference, not as it was in ancient ancient earth history when the moon was 12 times as large in
the sky, but the same visible diameter as the sun, now, now during this present epoch in time and in earth's evolutionary history when there are human
observers to see it, to notice it, and for some, for those who choose, assign a meaning and a significance to it (where others may choose not to if
they prefer to think of it as nothing but a blind chance coincidence, that's their right and priviledge)..
We can agree to disagree fine, no problem, but I wouldn't mind being able, being free to find some like-minded people with whom to share these ideas,
without being put to ridicule by the perceived scientific-astronomical kingpin of ATS. Can you understand that? Have a little respect is all I'm
asking I guess, nothing more.
edit on 13-6-2013 by NewAgeMan because: (no reason given)