It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tazdeill2
You don't get understatement, do you?
I don't see why there are so many people on this thread who are contributing little to the point of the thread, but are just locking horns in order to score points....
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by WonderBoi
Scientists among you? Where is your SCIENTIFIC PROOF, that HAARP is just a "research facility"? All i've seen, is blah, blah, blah, from you and your crew of "scientists". (LAUGHABLE) I've been rereading this thread, and noticed, you all stick up and "star" each other, to make it seem like you got the facts. But yet, i see no actual information, to back up your claims. You're another person that needs to learn about our invisible world. And, sorry to say, you don't know what HAARP can or can't do. IMO, your word means SQUAT; and neither does the word of our mighty dictators.
Again, time and again, it has been pointed out to you, HAARP does not transmit ELF.
The last video you posted, the man states at approximately 1:00 into the video, "...what seems to be cause and effect."
This is accurate. The man goes on to present subwoofers and a diorama, supposedly demonstrating the effects of ELF on the ground, causing a rock to shift.
Now, even if HAARP did transmit in the ELF range (which it does not), and its antennae were steerable (which they are not, being a fixed array), you stated this earlier...and I have already quoted it once...
Yeah, some of you should DENY IGNORANCE, if you believe HAARP is being used to communicate with submarines, underwater. Sure, they're gonna bounce a signal off of the ionosphere, just so they can send that signal beneath the water. Never mind the transmission that would get lost, throughout the journey. I'm GLAD none of you are "scientists".
SO...follow me closely here...YOU DO NOT BELIEVE an ELF signal can be bounced off the ionosphere to communicate with a submarine...YOU CLAIM the transmission would GET LOST, even though SCIENCE and real-life experience has proven otherwise...
OH NO...you want to believe a video that claims an ELF signal can be bounced off the ionosphere, without signal degradation or loss of energy, in order to cause an earthquake?
Please, for the love of Pete, spare the ATS community any further examples of cognitive dissonance...
Where is your SCIENTIFIC PROOF, that HAARP is just a "research facility"?
I've been rereading this thread, and noticed
And, sorry to say, you don't know what HAARP can or can't do.
IMO, your word means SQUAT
You can't handle the truth.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Yeah, some of you should DENY IGNORANCE, if you believe HAARP is being used to communicate with submarines, underwater. Sure, they're gonna bounce a signal off of the ionosphere, just so they can send that signal beneath the water. Never mind the transmission that would get lost, throughout the journey. I'm GLAD none of you are "scientists".
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Bedlam
It would have been more interesting to be able to split the array and deliver multiple beams at multiple frequencies or polarizations.
I see a new thread in the works from the HAARP weapon crew...
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by siliconpsychosis
I am unsure of the formal name for the device. As Bedlam made note, communication via ELF has become obsolete. Could still be used in case of emergency. Very stable means of communication.
Originally posted by Y3K89Atmospheric Plasma sounds like you "Heat" an area (Direct-point) or concentrated area of interest.
Originally posted by supergravity
The haarp cheer leaders on this thread are not lying about traditional methods of transmission systems, but.......
They ARE LEAVING OUT LITTLE KNOWN techniques that Tesla was working on and is the whole reason for the military experimenting on the atmosphere.
Originally posted by WonderBoi
First of all, the points i made, like this:were points made in the video.
*Steerable Antennae: can aim 3.6 million watts of ELF waves, into one tiny patch in the atmosphere
Originally posted by spektyr
reply to post by whatzshaken
This document may not be proof but it is good food for thought on this issue.
csat.au.af.mil...
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
AFAIK HAARP is not and was not used to generate ELF - it was used to study the ionosphere.
ELF transmitters have "aerials" 10's of kilometers long.
Originally posted by siliconpsychosis
didn't they call it the TLA (towed line array) or something?
Originally posted by winofiend
Originally posted by WonderBoi
Not really. Especially, when you consider who's got these weapons. You can believe the guise of 'research' if you want to. Your FREE choice. Others, like myself, tend to believe in an EVIL EMPIRE, hell bent on destroying our planet, and it's inhabitants. All this technology, and our planet is in worse shape than ever!!!!
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by WonderBoi
This is where the debunkers are HIGHLY mistaken.
And so was the premise of this thread...
Ahha! You're the rebel fleet.
Save us WonderBoi, you're our only hope.
We're in good hands.
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by siliconpsychosis
didn't they call it the TLA (towed line array) or something?
Well, it went through a couple of iterations.
Subs have towed hydrophone line arrays. That's a different thing.
Early ELF links ALSO used a towed line - not the same one as the sonar - in order to receive the signal. It was pretty limited in the first
en because you need a WHOPPER antenna for ELF to have any chance at all to receive it after the signal loss due to dissipative losses in seawater.
So the next generation used an active towed line array. This wasn't an antenna in the classical sense, they were using an insanely complex but brilliant trick for looking at the e-field slope. I don't have a digitizing pad here, and I generally run to the white board at this point so you'll have to forgive me, I'm not sure I can describe it exactly right. If you look at a wave propagating through space, at point x on the wave the amplitude is y, at point x + delta a bit further down the wave, the amplitude will be y' and so on, matching the oscillations in the e-field component.
Visualize it as taking a jump rope and tying one end to a wall. If I shake the rope so that I get a couple of standing waves in it (that part doesn't translate well, don't overthink it), you can see that for a wave of that frequency, at this point I'd expect the rope to be going up a little, a bit further going up more, a bit further going up a lot, a bit further hitting the peak, a bit further being down some from the peak and so on.
What the smart array did was have little sensors every few inches for the e-field component of the wave, and they all talked together and with the receiver in the sub, and they decided if the electric field each sensor was getting matched the 'profile' of the ELF wave they were wanting to receive. And thus did they pick the signal out of the background noise. THAT worked. It worked pretty well, except the tail was still big, and bulky, and if it failed you had to replace it, and it cost a wad.
The next generation got rid of the towed array altogether and put a pair of SQUIDS in the boat (heh) and detected the h-field component of the ELF wave instead. And that's how they pick up VLF today, also. No array needed.
(edits to remove sloppiness)edit on 9-6-2013 by Bedlam because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by siliconpsychosis
Wow thank you for the detailed explanation. I think I followed you. Let me paraphrase....
If you can detect small pieces of the whole signal you can extrapolate the whole signal using a "what we expect" template?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
AFAIK HAARP is not and was not used to generate ELF - it was used to study the ionosphere.
ELF transmitters have "aerials" 10's of kilometers long.
The doc used wires strung out on Antarctic ice and used VLF directly. HAARP makes ULF, VLF and ELF out of the arctic electrojet by a variety of means, including geometric and density modulation. It does NOT emit 3.6MW of ELF. It can induce the secondary emission of about 30W of ELF out of the electrojet in some modes, if the stars are right. This is about 3-4x what Sanguine and Seafarer could muster. But it's still not much.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
As I understand/imagine it, it can oscillate its own signal intensity at that frequency, thus inducing a response at that frequency in its target.
But it's output still remains in the kHz range - the intensity/power is ramped up and down 30 times/second.