reply to post by bobs_uruncle
We've been selling off the country's raw resources for 100s of years. Raw logs, coal, fur pelts, etc.
You claim that the government has instituted policies that invade Canadians' right to privacy. Please specify what specific policies you are
referring to. Don't come back with "do your own research" as I'm not willing to play that game. If you make the claim, it's up to you to provide
There is currently no bulk water exports from Canada. There was a permit issued by the Ontario
in 1999 which was subsequently cancelled due to
the controversy raised. There is no federal law against the export of bulk water other than the International Boundary Waters Act and the
International River Improvements Act which only affects lakes that are on the border with the US and rivers that flow across the border. Other rivers
and lakes are under provincial jurisdiction when it comes to bulk water exports.
As for the UN treaties, you seem to be referring primarily to Agenda 21, a non-binding
agreement on sustainable development. The UN can't
force any government to follow the suggestions contained in the agreement, though many of the items included we would be doing with or without the
existence of Agenda 21. NGOs have been involved in municipalities for as long as there have been people banding together to promote a common cause.
Local sports groups, business organizations, environmental groups, community groups, and others have attempted to influence municipality leadership,
with varying degrees of success, for 100s of years.
You do realize that with every new session of parliament the numbering of bills starts over at C-1? Which C-36 are you referring to, the Canadian
Anti-Terrorism Act passed in 2001 by the Liberal
government or the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act? I suspect the latter given the
reference to C-6 which was also a Consumer Product Safety Act bill that died.
Which C-22 are you referring to? Is it the Eeyou Marine Region Land Claims Agreement Act, the Act to amend the Criminal Code (age of protection) and
to make consequential amendments to the Criminal Records Act, the Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child pornography by persons who
provide an Internet service, or some other act?
I assume by C-45 you are referring to the recent omnibus budget bill. While I don't like the government passing legislation in that manner, it
certainly isn't illegal.
The AECL is a crown corporation and is not owned by the Rothschilds. The AECB, which has actually been the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission since
2000, is a federal regulatory agency and not owned by the Rothschilds. The AECL sold its CANDU reactor division to SNC-Lavalin, a Quebec based
engineering firm, in 2011. Investment bank NM Rothschild & Sons and the CIBC assisted in the sale but that does not mean either have ownership
interest in SNC-Lavalin.
I could go on but this is getting long.
Ultimately, none what you have mentioned constitutes treason. Apparently your extreme dislike of the man blinds you to this.
I'm glad you did not go into the Russell Williams as the fact that he had, as part of his military pilot duties, flown Harper and the Queen on
various occasions had absolutely nothing to do with the his being a rapist/murderer.