posted on Jun, 7 2013 @ 06:56 PM
Well that's an interesting about face after yesterday's rather blistering "President Obama's Dragnet" that is being discussed in another thread.
I'm actually rendered pretty speechless by the contrast between the two editorial pieces being hosted by the NY Times. Whereas yesterday's article
was blasting on about those same revelations. In fact, it was the very same paper that had that "predictable outrage" that the author of today's
variant speaks of. A glance at the NYTime's website shows a pretty hearty dispute on the subject of surveillance and is worth a look through.
The weird thing is that, as OneisOne noted in the other thread, the original article from the day before had been subtly modified to include the all
important words "this issue". This article, however, is seemingly in total defense of the surveillance. The author of the second article is Charles
A. Shanor, who is a professor of law at Emory University School of Law in Georgia and was appointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as
general counsel by former Pres. Ronald Reagan.
Shanor also wrote and published the books, "National Security and Military Law in a Nutshell" (2003)and "Counterterrorism Law" [ 2009), which I find
very interesting. Still however, doesn't beat the NY Times, generally thought of as being a "liberal rag", hosting an article that basically starts
out with a stab at liberals written by a man that was once appointed by Reagan in defense of Obama. Weird.
(visit the link for the full news article)