reply to post by exponent
Agreed. IMO, the nukes theory is at best very far fetched, and has no evidence.
I go along with the majority view inasmuch that a deliberate series of demolition charges brought all three towers down on 9/11, but why would
terrorists (whether they are domestic posing as elected or appointed officials or otherwise) re-invent the wheel to bring down large buildings?
Why would particle beams or mini-nukes be required, when the best tool for bringing buildings down was what was actually discovered in the dust and
residues on the remaining steel beams that were tested - namely Thermate.
Military grade, nano-thermite generates lots of Sulphur residue and nano particles of Iron rich spherules and unburnt nano-Thermite
particulates...which is exactly what was discovered in recovered dust and beam samples tested.
The towers, all three of them were demolished using military grade Thermite, Thermate.
The aircraft were used as a cover for this, well at least on two of the WTC towers they were.
The question in my mind is not how the destruction was achieved, the case and evidence for how is pretty solid, but why.
For Thermate to have worked, the buildings had to be rigged with strategically placed cutting and vapourising charges in advance.
Most theories concerned over when this happened center on periods just weeks before 9/11 when 'upgrades and remodelling' was supposedly being
carried out to the towers, entire floors and whole sections of the buildings were closed off to tennants and staff.
Unmarked vans, in convoy were seen leaving after staff had left and before cleaning staff arrives for the morning shifts.
There was ample opportunity to have teams plant the charges and remote detonators, so exactly when is open to discussion, as any one of those periods
could have been when.
But...is it possible there is another, secret reason for when the explosives were planted? A reason that would also go some way to explaining the
Government acting as suspiciously as they have done over the entire 9/11 episode, including odd and inexplicable things like NIST reports that make
absolutely no sense in the physical reality we live in, or FBI rushing around grabbing every piece of CCTV footage, cell phone footage and mall
security camera they could find, including 60 or so CCTV cameras covering every inch of the airspace around the Pentagon...which still haven't been
released despite the time that has passed, and that 9/11 is considered a closed case -Terrorists did it, and that's the end of it type of deal,
would ordinarily be thought of as a cloised case...so where are the recordings from all these cameras?
What could this secret reason be?
Why would it cause the Government to act as it has done, and to endorse a report that doesn't make sense to professionals who say the report is nuts
and full of holes?
Perhaps, it's becuase the Government, like many other's around the world all share a secret that 99.99% of people have absolutely NO idea about, and
it was hoped they never would know.
Explosives are planted in every important government, scientific, financial and large private sector constuctions around the country, probably around
most Western countries, even believe it or not even in neutral Switzerland, under residential streets...right under peoples feet in everyday streets
and in public and large private buildings.
Very true, and very verifiable folks.
A cold war relic of burning the boats, destroying major infrastructure to deny an invading enemy usage of those facilities.
The public would go nuts if they knew their children are playing over huge explosives and caches of demolition charges that would bring a building
down on them if it looked as though an enemy was going to overrun the US.
As good a reason to put a lid on as any.
If this is so, and it looks as though it might be, it in no way means there wasn't a conspiracy involving government and security services elements
planning to bring the buildings down, but it does go some way to explaining some of the more strange elements of the OS and seeming coyness shown by
Pres Bush and Cheney, for example only agreeing to testify in a closed door session, and only then if they can hold hands and be questioned
A US president, not able to answer questions by himself? And only in secret, despite the topic concerning every US citizen alive? Very strange.
What would it have meant to have had to admit to planting cold war era demo charges in major buildings throughout the US (and elsewhere)?
For a start, it would mean admitting to endangering the lives of people that used those building daily, second it would allow future attackers to
factor such information into potential attack plans, using the hidden explosives against the US and lastly, would mean billions spent on removing them
from all over the USA.