It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
If I had stolen jewels and had them hid in a safe, and the cops had a warrant to search my premises but couldn't get into the safe unless I gave them the combination, is that in violation of the 5th?
I doubt it. Though, like miss Smiley, I am unsure.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
If I had stolen jewels and had them hid in a safe, and the cops had a warrant to search my premises but couldn't get into the safe unless I gave them the combination, is that in violation of the 5th?
I doubt it. Though, like miss Smiley, I am unsure.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
If they had a search warrant for pictures, say, and came across a locked file cabinet...could they open the file cabinet under the assumption that the pics might be there?
Seems to me this would fall under the same category. If the police are looking for child porn, and if this person downloaded said porn...chances are high he encrypted it. I don't think this should give him protection, nor do I think the fifth amendment should apply. I also think, if he refuses to decrypt, that the police have the right (under the search warrant) to decrypt it for him.
I'll admit, Wrabbitt, I'm not well versed in constitutional law or police procedures. Maybe the police need a new search warrant that includes the encrypted files, to be safe.
.....decrypt one drive from Feldman’s “storage system” and discovered more than 700,000 files, some of “which constitute child pornography,”
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Upon further introspection, never mind the safe.
What if I hid a body and didn't/wouldn't reveal the location?
Wouldn't the same rules apply then?
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by davespanners
Thanks, Davespanners.
Do the authorities truly not have the software to crack such a code? I would think the military could do it, but perhaps not.
AES permits the use of 256-bit keys. Breaking a symmetric 256-bit key by brute force requires 2128 times more computational power than a 128-bit key. 50 supercomputers that could check a billion billion (1018) AES keys per second (if such a device could ever be made) would, in theory, require about 3×10⁵¹ years to exhaust the 256-bit key space.
Originally posted by shadow watcher
This is a very slippery slope, and I feel it is closely tied to those idiots in the tsa who need to access your laptop to board a plane.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Upon further introspection, never mind the safe.
What if I hid a body and didn't/wouldn't reveal the location?
Wouldn't the same rules apply then?
Originally posted by Sankari
Originally posted by shadow watcher
This is a very slippery slope, and I feel it is closely tied to those idiots in the tsa who need to access your laptop to board a plane.
I flew in and out of Texas last year. I brought my tablet with me on the plane. TSA never asked to access it; not even once. They just put it through the x-ray machine and let me walk off with it.
I'll be flying to Chicago in a few weeks, and I'm willing to bet the TSA won't ask to access my tablet—just like last time.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by ownbestenemy
Thanks for the clarification.
Originally posted by Sankari
I am not a fan of people who think it's OK to bend and twist the Constitution in all directions just so criminals can stay one step ahead of the law.
If the guy is innocent he'll be happy to decrypt those files and prove it. At this point his refusal to decrypt them is an act of self-incrimination.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
A question for all:
What is the difference of say, saved files on the computer and information in your head? It is after all, locked information right? Information that cannot be retrieved (yet) without your express and implicit agreement to give it.
That is the case. Think of this man's HDDs as an extension of his brain (creepy I know) and the State is compelling him to incriminate himself by allowing them to have unfettered access to that....
Stop it now or when technology reaches a point where they can gain viable information from our brains, they will point back to this case as it being allowable.