It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
They found 5 other bombs...who placed those.
The pressure cookers are large and heavy btw.
If he believed that he was cooperating with the security services while planting the bag then what conclusions the evidence brings about ?
All the witnesses evidence can be nullified because of it . Benefit of the doubt is given to defender and the eyewitness evidence becomes void in proving his guilt .
Originally posted by IndieA
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Char-Lee
So why was their friend being questioned murdered?]
He wasn't murdered. The man was a martial arts expert and the investigator was attacked.
The investigator had every right to protect himself. There was no reason for the investigator to
'murder' him.
It was first reported that one of the officers was stabbed by the guy. Now the FBI are not so sure that even happened. Don't you think it's odd they said he was just about to sign a confession about being involved in that triple homicide? I think it's odd they try to claim that two people they recently killed were behind the unsolved murder. It's just a little too convenient.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The problem is calling someone any kind of extremist when you have NO PROOF! When it is aimed at an individual you don't know it becomes racist or at the very least prejudice
The proof is the dead people. The proof is the 200+ severely injured people.
The proof is all the damage from the bomb blasts. The proof is the CONFESSION.
The proof is the film footage of the bombers taken during the execution of the bombing.
The proof is the eyewitness statements about the brother planting the bomb next to the victim.
The proof is the dozens upon dozens of eyewitness' who saw the brothers throw the
pressure cooker bomb at the police and civilians.
And no .. there is nothing even remotely 'racist' about stating the facts. That's absurd.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by Char-Lee
DEFLECTION attempt on your part. Epic fail.
The proof of their guilt in this situation is there. It's on this thread. Deal with it.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by 23432
If he believed that he was cooperating with the security services while planting the bag then what conclusions the evidence brings about ?
All the witnesses evidence can be nullified because of it . Benefit of the doubt is given to defender and the eyewitness evidence becomes void in proving his guilt .
His "belief" wouldn't nullify a damn thing! The only "belief" that matters in a US court of law is that of the Judge, and the jury.
See ya,
Milt
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by FlyersFan
It is very relevant because you are believing everything the same government has told you. You will believe anything and everything they tell you. That is why they can still do these things to innocent people!
Originally posted by Char-Lee
It is very relevant because you are believing everything the same government has told you.
You will believe anything and everything they tell you.
There is only one IF that matters and that is if he believed that he was cooperating with security services for a drill .
Just one if loop is enough to demolish all the eyewitness accounts .
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The FBI is still working on producing that video, had a few hang ups since they killed their look alike they were hoping to force make it.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
More likely would be they hired the older boy to help them with a "drill".
More likely these two were just what Russia warned us about ... radical Islamic terrorists.
The evidence is overwhelming and has been provided to you. Continue to close your eyes and
spout nonsensical extreme conspiracy theories if you wish.
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by 23432
There is only one IF that matters and that is if he believed that he was cooperating with security services for a drill .
Just one if loop is enough to demolish all the eyewitness accounts .
Your "IF" would only demonstrate Dzhokhar's ignorance, not his innocence! Ignorance is not an excuse under US law!
See ya,
Milt
Actually if the Jury believes his story then all of the eyewitness accounts of him placing a bag would mean diddly squad .
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by 23432
American Justice ?
Will it fail or will it prevail ?
What American justice? The kind where peoples homes are taken away because the city can claim higher taxes on what someone else wants to build on your property? Where cheaters and thieves on a higher level then me can get off scott free? Bankers and politicians and corporate owners can abuse the system?
Ignorance of what ?
How to differentiate between a real and a fake ID ?
Foreign intelligence agencies often run operations in target countries and pretend that they are the local law of some sort or the other .
Originally posted by BenReclused
reply to post by 23432
Actually if the Jury believes his story then all of the eyewitness accounts of him placing a bag would mean diddly squad .
As I said before, it's the jury's belief that counts, not Dzhokhar's.
See ya,
Milt