It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Am, I missing something . The Towers showed the wings of the Jet Liners made of 2024 T6 aluminum , maybe some 7075 T6 aluminum and other light metals penetrate all of those huge thick structural Steel Box columns all the way out to the tips . When you look at the Pentagon you see a hole supposedly from the fuselage . What am I not seeing ?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I said non passenger planes. They were military planes with remote controlled pods attached to the fuselage.
Originally posted by MrMaybeNot
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
h
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
I predict great things for this campaign and for this thread!
The thread title alone got me excited let alone the campaign.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are more than just patriots, theyre heroes.
One of those 2,000 engineers is a good friend of mine with a Masters in chemical engineering.
edit on 3-6-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
As painfully obvious that it is that 9/11 had help from the inside
this could never come to life or its the end of America.
Nobody would ever trust the US. and no american would ever trust the
white house.
Keeping the truth about 9/11 secret IS a matter of national security.
I think keeping the truth about 9/11 secret IS a matter of life security for the perpetrators.
the most damning evidence pointing to a controlled demolition is the overwhelming copious amount of white *micro-ash* that blanketed all of downtown Manhattan in a thick layer.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I said non passenger planes. They were military planes with remote controlled pods attached to the fuselage.
No, they were passenger planes - how do you explain the windows on them? The "remote control pods" were just part of the aircraft.
www.popularmechanics.com...
911review.com...
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Am, I missing something . The Towers showed the wings of the Jet Liners made of 2024 T6 aluminum , maybe some 7075 T6 aluminum and other light metals penetrate all of those huge thick structural Steel Box columns all the way out to the tips . When you look at the Pentagon you see a hole supposedly from the fuselage . What am I not seeing ?
I said non passenger planes. They were military planes with remote controlled pods attached to the fuselage. I posted the video and picture in the other thread and don't have time to post it again. Here are those posts:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
As for the pentagon it was probably a cruise missle launced from a predator drone. I am not sure about this though. I haven't studied the pentagon in great detail.
People do plenty of research so why don't you acknowledg it
Are you working for the rogue government?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I said non passenger planes. They were military planes
Indeed the lack of pentagon video footage is another smoking gun. Not that really pathetic 5fps clip of something exploding and being hazey as hell either. It is impossible to determine what if anything struck the pentagon.
Then they confiscated the surveillance videos from nearby business so that one can only assume the governments account of a passenger plane impacting the pentagon. The same none passenger planes that struck the twin towers and brought down 3 buildings in the complex. Please are people retarded or what??
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Indeed the lack of pentagon video footage is another smoking gun. Not that really pathetic 5fps clip of something exploding and being hazey as hell either. It is impossible to determine what if anything struck the pentagon.
Then they confiscated the surveillance videos from nearby business so that one can only assume the governments account of a passenger plane impacting the pentagon. The same none passenger planes that struck the twin towers and brought down 3 buildings in the complex. Please are people retarded or what??
The pentagon wasn't destroyed like the twin towers. And its military headquarters for the entire US War Machine. Does it really surprise anyone they don't want to show how it was done? Maybe to give others ideas, why not?
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Indeed the lack of pentagon video footage is another smoking gun. Not that really pathetic 5fps clip of something exploding and being hazey as hell either. It is impossible to determine what if anything struck the pentagon.
Then they confiscated the surveillance videos from nearby business so that one can only assume the governments account of a passenger plane impacting the pentagon. The same none passenger planes that struck the twin towers and brought down 3 buildings in the complex. Please are people retarded or what??
The pentagon wasn't destroyed like the twin towers. And its military headquarters for the entire US War Machine. Does it really surprise anyone they don't want to show how it was done? Maybe to give others ideas, why not?
It was a pretty clean story, a few snaps of the scene wouldn't have added more to the story if that WAS the story. ...Right?
Are you nuts or what?
21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?
The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—severing seven exterior columns—but this structural damage did not initiate the collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. The debris impact damage did play a secondary role in the last stages of the collapse sequence, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001. None of the large pieces of debris from WTC 2 hit WTC 7 because of the large distance between the two buildings.
"I saw, you know, there was definately fire in the building, you know, but ... um, I didn't hear any, and you know maybe this is movie crap, i didn't hear any creaking or i didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down, and all of a sudden the radios exploded and everybody started screaming, "Get away. Get away. Get away from it." and I was like a dear in the headlights. And I look up. It was that moment, you know, "Get away", and I looked up... and... it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. And all the things started peeling in on itself and... I mean, there was an umbrella of crap seven feet over my head that I just stared at. Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running and the [explitive]'s hitting the ground behind me and the whole time your hearing "thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom." So. I think I know an explosion when I hear it."
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by DeeKlassified
Excuse me, you said there was no gash to WTC7. I presented evidence that there was. Did I say that was the cause of the collapse? No. Reading comprehension 101. Might want to brush up on that.
Why is that important? The impact is what set off fires for over 5 hours, knocked off any fire-proofing in the area of impact, and as it ALSO stated in the NIST FAQ:
21. Did debris from the collapse of WTC 1 cause damage to WTC 7's structure in a way that contributed to the building's collapse?
The debris from WTC 1 caused structural damage to the southwest region of WTC 7—severing seven exterior columns—but this structural damage did not initiate the collapse. The fires initiated by the debris, rather than the structural damage that resulted from the impacts, initiated the building's collapse after the fires grew and spread to the northeast region after several hours. The debris impact caused no damage to the spray-applied fire-resistive material that was applied to the steel columns, girders, and beams except in the immediate vicinity of the severed columns. The debris impact damage did play a secondary role in the last stages of the collapse sequence, where the exterior façade buckled at the lower floors where the impact damage was located. A separate analysis showed that even without the structural damage due to debris impact, WTC 7 would have collapsed in fires similar to those that occurred on Sept. 11, 2001. None of the large pieces of debris from WTC 2 hit WTC 7 because of the large distance between the two buildings.
www.nist.gov...
As for Craig Bartmer?
For someone to be that close to the base of WTC7, to only look at the WTC7 collapsing AFTER someone yells its coming down, run for your life, and MISS the massive blasts before collapse?
"I saw, you know, there was definately fire in the building, you know, but ... um, I didn't hear any, and you know maybe this is movie crap, i didn't hear any creaking or i didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down, and all of a sudden the radios exploded and everybody started screaming, "Get away. Get away. Get away from it." and I was like a dear in the headlights. And I look up. It was that moment, you know, "Get away", and I looked up... and... it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. And all the things started peeling in on itself and... I mean, there was an umbrella of crap seven feet over my head that I just stared at. Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running and the [explitive]'s hitting the ground behind me and the whole time your hearing "thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom." So. I think I know an explosion when I hear it."
Yeah, nothing that gives away it is going to collapse. No sounds. Nothing. Then all of a sudden his radio "explodes" and people scream "Get away get away!!" and THEN he looks up and sees the building caving in over him? Yeah, wow, and thn after that, he hears the booms of "expletive deleted' hitting the ground behind him. This must be the first time a building started to collapse well before the explosives went off. After all, how could someone like him, at the very base of WTC7 miss something like this:
or miss this:
So the only thing that got his attention was not the above sound of demo charges, but people and radios screaming to run. No bangs,no booms, no thooms. Remember this one fact, for ever and ever, as long as you live: buildings do not silently collapse before the explosives explode. Explosives do not explode silently. They go boom, then the building comes down. Not the other way around. For someone that was allegedly right next to it, to completely miss those blasts (and admit it unintentionally to boot ) it hurts your argument even more so. Explosives go boom loudly. He didnt hear a darn thing until it actually started to have an umbrella of crap over him.edit on 6/5/2013 by GenRadek because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
Indeed the lack of pentagon video footage is another smoking gun. Not that really pathetic 5fps clip of something exploding and being hazey as hell either. It is impossible to determine what if anything struck the pentagon.
Then they confiscated the surveillance videos from nearby business so that one can only assume the governments account of a passenger plane impacting the pentagon. The same none passenger planes that struck the twin towers and brought down 3 buildings in the complex. Please are people retarded or what??
The pentagon wasn't destroyed like the twin towers. And its military headquarters for the entire US War Machine. Does it really surprise anyone they don't want to show how it was done? Maybe to give others ideas, why not?
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by nOraKat
the most damning evidence pointing to a controlled demolition is the overwhelming copious amount of white *micro-ash* that blanketed all of downtown Manhattan in a thick layer.
The only evidence of "controlled demo" is leftover firing train components. They should be littering the site (in "overwhelming copious amounts").
Mmm hmm?
Spent shock tube...