It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The policy of uncontrolled immigration simply served to eradicate this country of identity, eradicate personal freedom, decrease wages and decrease purchasing power. All the while the organ grinders see profits through the roof and ease of control over a divided population increase.
Originally posted by n00bUK
I agree with all your post, but UKIP far right? I'm sorry but I don't see this. How people can mutter Griffins name in the same sentence as UKIP is beyond my understanding.
I know UKIP have some # policies but to be fair they are a great party and well structured to say they have only been around a couple of years
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by SecretFace
The policy of uncontrolled immigration simply served to eradicate this country of identity, eradicate personal freedom, decrease wages and decrease purchasing power. All the while the organ grinders see profits through the roof and ease of control over a divided population increase.
Amazing because what you said here in regard to the UK, is exactly what we see here in the US where diluting the electorate and the nation's culture is the ultimate goal of our own 'organ grinders' that are the corpo-government complex.
Even as the public has nothing against legal, fair immigration, the hegemony of those looking for a mass class of cheap/slave labor and those seeking to water-down the vote to a point where a solid majority of any direction or slant is impossible, continue their work under the protection of our fully owned main scream media.
And, of course, for those who dare speak on this subject for what it is, there is labeling and tagging of being racists or fascists... or any of a dozen other negative political identifiers. The whole concept of positive nationalism... where one is proud of one's nationality and heritage, has been so smeared and maligned that even saluting your flag can can be (and often is) turned into an act of villainy and ee-ville.
The Orwellian stage seems almost set for the show to begin.
Originally posted by SecretFace
The EU Mafia are taking the UK to court over migrant benefit reductions.
The British government, in the wake of surging UKIP support, is now drifting further to the right by, rightly so, looking to restrict benefits to migrants.
...
The EU Parliament is the most overtly authoritarian governing body that has existed in modern times. It’s whole basis of rule is based on Communist ideology. The rules, regulations, bureaucratic processes and sheer scale of the autocracy alone dwarfs that of what was created under the hammer and sickle.
Originally posted by Danbones
just like with Hitler:
when the handguns go, the tyranny comes in
Originally posted by Sankari
Originally posted by SecretFace
The EU Mafia are taking the UK to court over migrant benefit reductions.
The British government, in the wake of surging UKIP support, is now drifting further to the right by, rightly so, looking to restrict benefits to migrants.
...
The EU Parliament is the most overtly authoritarian governing body that has existed in modern times. It’s whole basis of rule is based on Communist ideology. The rules, regulations, bureaucratic processes and sheer scale of the autocracy alone dwarfs that of what was created under the hammer and sickle.
...and not a single shred of evidence was provided.
Seriously, if you're going to post a wall of text you should at least throw in a few credible references to support your case.
Originally posted by Sankari
Originally posted by Danbones
just like with Hitler:
when the handguns go, the tyranny comes in
Hitler actually relaxed Germany's gun legislation, and he did not ban handguns.
The Hitler gun control lie.
www.infowars.com...
But her current measure would go much further and, in many ways, actually mirrors anti-gun measures enacted nearly 75 years ago by Nazi leader Adolph Hitler, in a bid to disarm a particular ethnic group he loathed.
This is gun control redux
Prior to 1938, when Hitler’s new restrictions were put in place, the earlier Weimar Republic government had already enacted gun registration. “The laws adopted by the Weimar Republic intended to disarm Nazis and Communists were sufficiently discretionary that the Nazis managed to use them against their enemies once they were in power,” says Clayton Cramer, author of the book Firing Back, as told to the website The Straight Dope. So what Hitler essentially did was strengthen existing German law (which was aimed primarily at preventing Jews from being armed).
And that is the all-important difference. Bernard E. Harcourt, writing for the University of Chicago Law School and Political Science Department, notes:
If you read the 1938 Nazi gun laws closely and compare them to earlier 1928 Weimar gun legislation – as a straightforward exercise of statutory interpretation – several conclusions become clear. First, with regard to possession and carrying of firearms, the Nazi regime relaxed the gun laws that were in place in Germany at the time the Nazis seized power. Second, the Nazi gun laws of 1938 specifically banned Jewish persons from obtaining a license to manufacture firearms or ammunition. Third, approximately eight months after enacting the 1938 Nazi gun laws, Hitler imposed regulations prohibiting Jewish persons from possessing any dangerous weapons, including firearms.
Whilst many mainstream politicians argue that those who will come to the UK will mostly be along the lines of the last mass migration from the likes of Poland i.e. young hard working individuals..