It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by alfa1
I'd still be interested in seeing some of that DNA data.
They've had it for quite a while now, and yet they're still saying "it could take YEARS" more study.
FFS, release it to the public if they want any answers.
If its not just about raking in more money, having geneticists swarm all over the sequences would produce more knowledge in a smaller time.
Edit - looking at the report here...
Reconstruction of the mitochondrial DNA sequence and analysis shows an allele frequency consistent with a B2 haplotype group found on the west coast of South America, supporting the claimed origination of the specimen from the Atacama Desert region of Chile.
So what we have so far is the bits of DNA they have not examined = no conclusion.
But the bits of DNA they have examined = ordinary human.
edit on 3-6-2013 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by solve
reply to post by Bilk22
and thats just something that someone made for fun, imagine what a serious artist could do with the proper raw materials, so thats that.
people are easily fooled.
and let me clarify, i do believe its organic, i just dont believe its an alien life form.edit on 3-6-2013 by solve because: (no reason given)
and one more thing, based on the evidence, i think its a progeria child with an artificially elonged skull,
or a monkey hoax. we share 50% of our dna with the common fruit fly,,,,edit on 3-6-2013 by solve because: one moreedit on 3-6-2013 by solve because: oopsie daisy
Originally posted by mikemck1976
Robert Ripley knew what the Atacama Humanoid was in the 1930′s!
Pick up and flip though Ripley's Search for the Shrunken Heads: and Other Curiosities and you will find the image above of Ripley holding a particularly familiar tiny humanoid. According to his notes, the oddity turned out to be a person who was chosen for a full-body “reduction” rather than just a shrinking of the head.
Where did Mr. Ripley find this little guy?
Interestingly enough, Ripley found the shrunken body in Peru and named it “Atta-Boy”, after the nearby Atacama Desert, the same desert where Dr. Steven Greer would eventually find the humanoid body in Sirius. Hardly a coincidence worth ignoring!
Some of us still read books Mr. Greer!
Originally posted by Nevertheless
reply to post by OrionHunterX
What on earth (pun intended) made you think that this is an extra terrestrial creature?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by OrionHunterX
It happens the same way this 16 year old girl can be stuck in the body of a 6 month old infant:
16 year old baby girl
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Originally posted by Nevertheless
reply to post by OrionHunterX
What on earth (pun intended) made you think that this is an extra terrestrial creature?
Did you even bother to read the first two lines of my opening post? I don't think you did. Or either English is your second language or you have a comprehension deficit!!
Originally posted by Bilk22
Originally posted by mikemck1976
Robert Ripley knew what the Atacama Humanoid was in the 1930′s!
Pick up and flip though Ripley's Search for the Shrunken Heads: and Other Curiosities and you will find the image above of Ripley holding a particularly familiar tiny humanoid. According to his notes, the oddity turned out to be a person who was chosen for a full-body “reduction” rather than just a shrinking of the head.
Where did Mr. Ripley find this little guy?
Interestingly enough, Ripley found the shrunken body in Peru and named it “Atta-Boy”, after the nearby Atacama Desert, the same desert where Dr. Steven Greer would eventually find the humanoid body in Sirius. Hardly a coincidence worth ignoring!
Some of us still read books Mr. Greer!
So what are you suggesting?
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by OrionHunterX
The description reminds me of the Tamara Vasilievna Prosvirina story.
perdurabo10.tripod.com...
I had a hard time believing such a child would be able to live and eat. According to the persons involved it did not grow.
Aleshenka was a greyish creature about twenty-five centimeters (9.8 in) in length. Its hairless head had a number of dark spots. The eyes were large, occupying most of the face. It breathed through a small nose below the eyes.
en.wikipedia.org...
According to genetic experts at the Moscow Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, DNA analysis of the clothes Aleshenka was wrapped in revealed no evidence that "he" was extraterrestrial. On April 15, 2004, the scientists made an official statement that the "Kyshtym creature" was a premature female human infant, with severe deformities.[3]edit on 3-6-2013 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)edit on 3-6-2013 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)edit on 3-6-2013 by Char-Lee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by vind21
We have legit starchild DNA that does not match anything human and its a FOXP2 as well , and still no one cares.
How much more proof do we need, the DNA is obviously not enough when people just choose not to accept evidence.
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
> Atacama is a desert. How did it survive for 6 long years?
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Straight up fetus.
Originally posted by nosboy
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Straight up fetus.
Absolutely, i saw something recently about this being a fetus but i cannot remember where, i think it was on here somewhere but the evidence did show it was a fetus and it was mummified i remember rightly.
medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...
metro.co.uk...