It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MinangATS
I really don't understand why giving Federal duties to the States helps.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. -Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Speak for yourself, colonist.
Originally posted by rock427
This isn't 'do' or 'die'. No one is advocating a total withdraw of government.
Originally posted by BadBeast
It's not Goverment that's the problem, the enemy, itt's the very idea of government.That we need to e governed..It's been culturally drummed into us for so long we have forgotten how to take charge of our own lives. How to look to ourselves for answers instead of some ruling body. Anarchy (Not anarchISM)
The rule of one. The self. There should be no sovereign greater than that which you have yourself. No kingdom bigger than one man's life. The proportionate resourcing of everyman's needs from sustainable sources. All pVia apple
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by BadBeast
It's not Goverment that's the problem, the enemy, itt's the very idea of government.That we need to e governed..It's been culturally drummed into us for so long we have forgotten how to take charge of our own lives. How to look to ourselves for answers instead of some ruling body. Anarchy (Not anarchISM)
The rule of one. The self. There should be no sovereign greater than that which you have yourself. No kingdom bigger than one man's life. The proportionate resourcing of everyman's needs from sustainable sources. All pVia apple
how can you honestly believe what you said. the reality of great wealth and the destructive power that comes with it, has been documented for thousands of years in human history. representative governments strong enough to control the vile and barbaric use of wealth's power, is the only thing that separates us from the master/slave formula that has plagued us throughout human history.
wealth is getting it's way....it has almost eliminated unions (down to 13% of all jobs), it has almost eliminated any type of company pension, it has spent billions over the decades to lobby for less pay to workers, weaker safety conditions on the job, weaker environmental controls, dirtier air, dirtier water, less political involvement, less regulatory oversight, less taxes paid by the upper 1%........wealth does not like you, or want you, unless you are of service to them, period. I can't understand why the massive majority of people in this world don't understand that, or refuse to accept it.
I believe government is necessary for any civilized nation. Without common rules being set, there would be anarchy
Anarchism is the movement for social justice through freedom. It is concrete, democratic and egalitarian. It has existed and developed since the seventeenth century, with a philosophy and a defined outlook that have evolved and grown with time and circumstance. Anarchism began as what it remains today: a direct challenge by the underprivileged to their oppression and exploitation. It opposes both the insidious growth of state power and the pernicious ethos of possessive individualism, which, together or separately, ultimately serve only the interests of the few at the expense of the rest.
I never even mentioned wealh. But seeing as you brought it up, wealth is not getting it's way. What you are talking about is money. And ultimately, money has no value. And what's the point of having a Government that is up for sale? The Ancient Greeks gave up democracy over 2000 years ago, because it's too easily corrupted. So why are we priding ourselves on our democratic process? What purpose do our governments serve? Yours? I doubt it. Mine? Certainly not. They serve whoever pays them the most money. And where does that money come from? It's MADE UP by Central Bankers. There's no wealth there. Money only has value because we're told it has value. And people just do what they're told. By their Governments. Again, what purpose does government serve?
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by BadBeast
It's not Goverment that's the problem, the enemy, itt's the very idea of government.That we need to e governed..It's been culturally drummed into us for so long we have forgotten how to take charge of our own lives. How to look to ourselves for answers instead of some ruling body. Anarchy (Not anarchISM)
The rule of one. The self. There should be no sovereign greater than that which you have yourself. No kingdom bigger than one man's life. The proportionate resourcing of everyman's needs from sustainable sources. All pVia apple
how can you honestly believe what you said. the reality of great wealth and the destructive power that comes with it, has been documented for thousands of years in human history. representative governments strong enough to control the vile and barbaric use of wealth's power, is the only thing that separates us from the master/slave formula that has plagued us throughout human history.
wealth is getting it's way....it has almost eliminated unions (down to 13% of all jobs), it has almost eliminated any type of company pension, it has spent billions over the decades to lobby for less pay to workers, weaker safety conditions on the job, weaker environmental controls, dirtier air, dirtier water, less political involvement, less regulatory oversight, less taxes paid by the upper 1%........wealth does not like you, or want you, unless you are of service to them, period. I can't understand why the massive majority of people in this world don't understand that, or refuse to accept it.
Originally posted by rock427
This isn't 'do' or 'die'. No one is advocating a total withdraw of government. We just don't need a nanny state that politicizes every little 'issue' there is. Believe it or not, some of us think that government can't and shouldn't always be the answer...
Originally posted by seamus
Due to the destruction of the nuclear family, I see communities-as-localities banding together to provide protection for those who want to be useful to the community. I also see the 'roving bandits' turning to traveling minstrelship in order to have a legitimate way to contribute. Or circuses. Entertainment has an important place in a post-government world.
Originally posted by Jedimind
Government is horrible because it is IMMORAL. Not because I don't care for it or it's my opinion that it isn't good, IT IS INHERENTLY IMMORAL AND ROTTEN TO THE CORE.
IT IS AN IDEA THAT IS ROOTED IN AN ANCIENT, OUTDATED WAY OF THINKING AND IT IS TIME FOR US TO OUTGROW IT.
Why is it immoral? Because; To give a small group of individuals a complete monopoly on the use of violence and the threat of the use of violence against us to achieve it's goals is 100% immoral and wrong.
If you disagree about their ability to use violence, try not paying your taxes for a while, or try breaking an unjust law..you will eventually be met with force, most likely a gun held by a man with an unjust claim to authority over your innate rights.
"If you hate government so much, then what is your solution mr. smarty pants?"
Here's the answer: A moral and decent, voluntary society with respect to property rights based on the principles of non aggression and non coercion.
I implore anyone intersted in these topics to check out Stefan Molyneux. He has been pointing out the immorality of government for quite some time in a very clear and precise way.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by Cabin
I believe government is necessary for any civilized nation. Without common rules being set, there would be anarchy
Amarchy is not a bad thing....
Anarchism is the movement for social justice through freedom. It is concrete, democratic and egalitarian. It has existed and developed since the seventeenth century, with a philosophy and a defined outlook that have evolved and grown with time and circumstance. Anarchism began as what it remains today: a direct challenge by the underprivileged to their oppression and exploitation. It opposes both the insidious growth of state power and the pernicious ethos of possessive individualism, which, together or separately, ultimately serve only the interests of the few at the expense of the rest.