Dear readers of ATS:
Some of you, unfortunately, are a little impatient, and I understand this. Some of you (understandably), are thinking "this is all
I will brave a few remarks on this, before I proceed to complete this session by completing my response to user: Kgnow.
You might be very interested and fascinated to learn, that science and spirituality are not in the slightest incompatible with each other. It is a
fiction and illusion (another tool in the vast tool kit of your 'masters,' let's just say) to create doubt in your minds, by making you think that the
pathway to spirituality leads to a destiny not all that different from conventional religion, which leads us back into the dark ages.
How well I understand this sentiment, which is why, I will briefly address this, before going back to my strictly adhered to policy: chronological
answering of questions asked.
Let's briefly discuss some things.
Firstly, science was not 'created' be scientists (or sophists/logicians/etc). It was created by (surprise, surprise!) esotericians of various orders
Don't believe me? Why don't you investigate the life and times of Francis Bacon? While he certainly wasn't the first scientist (far from it), he
certainly introduced the scientific method (observation-hypothesis-experiment-theory) to Europe, after it had drowned in the follies of the Dark Ages.
It was (as a highly evolved soul), one of his voluntary tasks, while incarnated on Earth, to re-institute (yes, re-institute, science existed already
with the old Pythagoreans thousands of years prior and even millions of years before that with the Atlanteans!) the scientific method in Europe.
In conventional history (mostly fairy tales and wives tales/gossip; don't believe me? Study the historiographic method, and learn how UNscientific
conventional historical practices are. I have written several history papers myself at University, whilst an undergrad. I know the erroneous and
primitive methods used by historians to establish the so-called muse of 'history' in your fairy tales of 'learning.') it is believed that the
scientific method was a new and revolutionary insight to combat religious over-saturation and mental and emotional slavery by the Christian Church.
This is only partially true.
The individuals who saved Europe were not scientists. They were the Old-Rosicrucians from the 14th Century onwards, established by the Bacons, along
with the Old-Masonic (don't compare modern Masonry with old-Masonry, please. That would be an abomination) and Old-Gnostic orders. These were
'free-thinking' societies, established for and by the intellectual elite (beyond the mental level of some of the individuals in this forum, thinking
they are clever and informed, because they follow conventional science, which isn't even what science is supposed to be: A place for free-thinking
intellectuals, rather than a dogmatic, institutionalized slave-house!)
When I read people's posts, the authors of which are perhaps well-meaning but perversely misinformed, claiming superiority/reverence/knowledge in a
field (like science) they don't even understand, I feel pity and sorrow, and I can only hope that you criticasters would cease your intellectual
laziness and do some proper research as to our (humanity's) true history and legacy!
Leibniz was a Rosicrucian.
Goethe was a Rosicrucian.
Newton was an Alchemist and Esoterician
Leonardo Da Vinci was an Alchemist and Esoterician (some even would call him a magician!)
Francis Bacon was a Rosicrucian and a White Magician (adept of the right-hand path)
Galileo was an occultist
Einstein was a mysticist
Carl Sagan was an informed, cautious skeptic, bordering on mysticism
Emanuel Swedenborg was a mysticist
Pythagoras was a Hylozoician and White Magician
Jeshu was a Gnostician and a White Magician
Christos was an ascended Master
Idiots will be idiots, & reason will not penetrate their brick-layered skulls!
But know this: Humanity was (and always will be) lifted to greater heights by the Spiritualists (my brothers) (Esotericians/Gnosticians/Rosicrucians
of old (not the modern, perverted versions)/etc), not by your buffoon-like mediocrities that are:
Harris (I do think his heart is in the right place, though)
Even the likes of Feynman knew better, than to exercise such wanton stupidity.
The plastic heroes you cling on to, dear pseudo-skeptics, are not the individuals who propelled humanity forward to the scientific/technical
achievements we all now benefit from. They emanated from a very small, select few group of spiritually enlightened souls, who were able to use their
splendorous brilliance to assist us in our mindless struggles.
Show some appreciation, & leave your snide, impotent remarks for lesser minds to worry about (youtube would be a good cave for you troll
edit on 3-6-2013 by Initiate because: added a couple more dunces to the list.