It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

[HOAX] A *NEW* Window of Opportunity: Ask, and ye shall receive.[HOAX]

page: 8
136
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:13 PM
link   
Who were the occupants of Lemuria and Atlantis? What happened to them?

What is the significance of the number 9?

Obviously you believe in reincarnation. What is the true purpose? Is it optional or required.

BBL with more questions.




posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:13 PM
link   
I want to add to this thread that the very excited opposing replies to the OP show nothing but pathetic attempts to boast the skeptic qualities and hoax debunking abilities of those who wrote such replies. This really is the sole purpose of such replies; not saving the forum members from being deceived. It also shows (and that's a funny one) immense interest in the topic! Those who mock the OP are the ones who stick around in the thread the most.

If you want to save ATS members from that false prophet, go ahead and start your own post. Don't oversize the thread with useless and time consuming replies that add nothing to it, and worst of all, most irrelevant to it.

Because, guys, guess what? People who want to listen to this guy talking aren't all gullible and ignorant. I've read a lot of BS on ATS including ET-MAN's thread, and Hidden Hand and many many more. I am familiar with all of this, and I can see all the problems with the idea of someone going to the forum and saying what's equivalent to: "hey, I am all knowing and I will descend to your level and give you a sip of my infinite knowledge". I know how silly it sounds and I know that everything the OP said, says and will say, will mostly be based on no evidence at all. You can analyze the crap out of this whole situation and come up with numerous logic problems and skeptic alerts. I know for a fact that I have no logical reason to believe a single word of what this guy has to say. But, still, after all this, I still find this an entertaining read because it's very well written and articulate and I enjoy listening to someone who knows how to speak and (even) write mostly academically correct English (unlike myself).

I love reading for and listening to people who know how to talk and demonstrate very organized and structured thoughts because to me it's an indication that, well, this guy doesn't sound like a complete retard, he knows very well how to communicate his knowledge, and he might very well be onto something. There might be shred of truth of what he's saying. A shred of truth, just a shred is all it takes for you to have complete paradigm shift in your beliefs and perception of reality because he's making some very very bold statements. It's called being open minded, cautiously. Not completely living in my fortified paradigm not allowing any light of anything that might even remotely challenge my set of beliefs.

If you don't buy into this, I won't tell you not to read it because its your right as an ATS reader to read whatever you want. I just really wish if you would, in the boundaries of respect (which the OP is sticking to as of now), challenge the OP's CORE arguments and nothing else. You can go out of your way and analyze every word he says, but, in context and within the boundaries of respect.

*sigh*



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Initiate
 


1. How shall I identify the truth?
2. How shall I identify what is good?
3. What must I do to understand the truth and what is good?
4. How can I benefit from this knowledge?



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Folks I hate to admit it but the OP's messages are actually resonating with me as truth, from an intuitive perspective.

At first I was going to be sarcastic, then I decided to read all the content of the OP and additional posts.

The reason for all the flags without a single shred of evidence is that it is resonating with many others too.

OP still listening here.

edit on 3-6-2013 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:23 PM
link   
PART VII(a)

Here, and in my subsequent post, end my answers to Kgnow. It has taken (I believe) around 10 posts, most of them filled to a maximum, to answer his very important questions.

I have taken such time, because I wish you (the reader) to stop living your life constantly in the dark, with half-truths and ambiguities abounded. My philosophy is: it's better to be silent, than communicate an ambiguity (an opinion).

Let's wrap this up.

Firstly, I will finalize section b) of question 3 (so that no ambiguities, hopefully, remain):

3)b) I stated in my conclusion and I quote: "Only by maintaining hatred/conflict/suffering/etc, will BMs and aspirants to BMhood, maintain their magical sovereignty in the worlds of man! The emotional world = world of duality. Ponder on this, dear reader! "

Let's elaborate. Every time you experience an emotion*** (positive = attraction, 'neutral,' negative = repulsion), your aura (material envelopes, specifically the emotional envelope; I haven't yet discussed the significance of your mental envelope in detail) you vibrate (or resonate) (quite unwittingly in most cases, unless it's a deliberate attempt to dabble in magic) certain elemental thought forms about and within your auric field. These thought forms affect not only you, of course, but others who come into contact with you. It depends how we affect others mainly on:

i) our own spiritual development
ii) their spiritual development

***positive emotions can be things such as: sentimental love (lowest and most primitive form of love, if you could even call it that), impersonal, divine, all-embracing love (a higher form of love), sincere devotion to one's religion (although this would be a lower form of vibration, but attractive nonetheless), admiration for a great artist/poet/scientist (not a very evolved emotion, once again, but still attractive), good work ethic, emotional and mental hygiene (discipline), interest in the well-being of oneself and others, etc.

'neutral emotions' don't really exist, except in that they might be compared to simply being emotions that are on the 4th plane (or dimension, the 7+4 = 11th dimension overall, in our cosmos) of the emotional world (to avoid confusion, I shall refer to it as simply a single world, and its constituent dimensions as either planes or dimensions), which constitutes the most evolved type of gross, emotional repulsion (or hatred).

negative (repulsive) emotions can be: envy, jealousy, rage, anger, contempt, suspicion, fear, apathy (!!), gleefulness, irritability, dishonesty, insincerity, delighting in other people's misfortunes, incessant curiosity (especially toward other people and their lives), lustfulness (especially the pornographic kind), competition, gossip, etc. (anybody can add to this at will).

Before I continue: Look at the world around you, and ask yourself, "what is my world filled with? What is it, that I receive from my media, my political leaders, my family, friends, co-workers...? Is it attraction, or is it mainly repulsion? Who could benefit from this the most? Me and my family, or those, who have a vested interest in harvesting my lowly repulsive vibrations for their own purposes? Hmmm."

Evolution is not so much concerned with how 'good' or 'bad' you are, but how effectively you can control the energies in the worlds of man. This means, a Mother Theresa type or an Oprah type, who try [or at least pretend to try] to help people, could very well be far less developed than a vile cretin like a Rothschild or a Hitler. Why? This requires quite a bit of time discussing, because evolutionary development entails not merely "moral goodness" but the actual spiritual capacity to consciously function in one's various material envelopes. This might seem like a contradiction to some people who feel like ennoblement of emotionality could not possibly slide back down to the depths of evil. But, lest we forget, all higher molecular/atomic kinds in our dimensional worlds, contain the lowers kinds. This means, you can still obtain a sovereignty in the higher kinds, whilst stimulating the lower vibrations. Think of it this way: If you build a skyscraper and walk all the way up to the top floor, you can still make a decision to walk back down, and settle, for example, to live your life in the bottom floor. The sky scraper is still there. You built it, and it's yours. But you prefer to live on the ground floor, than on the top. This is how it is with evolution. You have to build the skyscraper first, however. There are no shortcuts, but it is our divine right to live on the ground floor of the skyscraper, if, after once having built it, we so choose. This is how it is with BMs. They are highly evolved souls, who have used their free will to dwell in the lower regions of their evolutionary conquests.


in Part VII(b), my post and answers to Kgnow shall end, and I will most likely take an extended break, as my back, once again, is making itself known.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:26 PM
link   
reply to post by TheAlmo
 


You can't fault anyone for using rationality. The OP is claiming to be privy to "the truth" without any in depth explanation as to how he has access to it or why anyone should consider him anything other than a joke. There's literally no reason to take this guy seriously. I see an opening post that leans towards metaphysical/spiritual explanations, which is A) Nothing new B) Just more nonsense that relies on faith alone.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by WilliamOckham
reply to post by TheAlmo
 


You can't fault anyone for using rationality. The OP is claiming to be privy to "the truth" without any in depth explanation as to how he has access to it or why anyone should consider him anything other than a joke. There's literally no reason to take this guy seriously. I see an opening post that leans towards metaphysical/spiritual explanations, which is A) Nothing new B) Just more nonsense that relies on faith alone.


Faith is one thing, but what many people have been conditioned, or actually brainwashed in is the fact they do not possess self-empowerment, or any intuitive skills.

Faith is a religious term, based solely on giving up your personal power to a higher being, instead of self-empowerment as a co-creator.

From a personal perspective we are all equal, and somewhere along the line, we have just forgotten that fact.
edit on 3-6-2013 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Initiate
 


Have you read much Carlos Castaneda?



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamOckham
 


Off topic posts removed by mods are not rational.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth

Folks I hate to admit it but the OP's messages are actually resonating with me as truth, from an intuitive perspective.


Indeed. Ive read it all and it seems there is at least some truth within the words. Some things I would strongly disagree with, based on knowledge personally acquired, independent of someone or something *telling* me it was true, other things I would disagree with for other reasons, but some of it is helping "put the pieces together" so to speak, about questions unasked and even unthought.

Each individual needs to be able to extract their own *meaning* from information presented. Even thorough out and out lies can be used in a positive way (this is not an insinuation) if the individual hearing the lies is able to extract meaning from the meta-event of being lied to.

This will be impossible for the hyper-logical left brainer and its ultra-gullible counterpart. Both rejecting all and accepting all will lead you to a false conclusion. But through a balanced and synergistic symbiosis between the metaphorical "right" and "left" brains, meaning can be extracted from the information presented.

The information itself has no intrinsic meaning, just like a symbol means nothing until you give that symbol some kind of meaning.

So in essence the information presented is not in anyway important whatsoever.

Its the MEANING that you extract from the totality of the experience of reading, interpreting, discerning, and interacting, that is whats important.


edit on 6/3/2013 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by snc24
reply to post by Initiate
 


Thank's dear Initiate!

I will read carefully all you say.
I heard a lot of nonsense here, why not listen to you?

Question: What is the best way to know the origin of everything, man's creation, big bang theory, etc without derailing from actual scientific data?

SNC


Well I'm not OP, but I'll take this one anyway. My two cents: There IS no way to do that without expanding scientific data because scientific data is far too limited to explain it all.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 01:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by NightFlight
Why do "aliens" fear nuclear detonations, more so than earth humans?

According to New Age sites that say they are in contact with aliens, a nuke destroys everything that a human has.
Even the spirit is destroyed.

Now aliens are demons and want as many slaves as possible to attack Jesus's army when He returns on Judgement Day.

Nuking sinners lowers Lucifer's chances of victory on that Final Day in the Valley of Megiddo.

Come on @OP. This is basic knowledge. You should already know this. If you had been to M345 in Sheol you would already know this general information.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:00 PM
link   
reply to post by CaticusMaximus
 


I have to say you must be reading my mind because I was going to elaborate on my post.

The fact that everyday we are presented with facts, stories, and so called news and some people seem to just take them at face value without exploration is beyond baffling. Accepting news at face value, without intuition, is just easier or more convenient way to deny the truth.

Denying one's intuition resents a group that is not self-empowered, but more giving their universal rights and powers away.

Hence, the fact that some people's intuitions are suppressed and discarded.


Has it actually occurred to anyone why so many more distraction seem to be popping up on a daily basis?

I personally think it is because TPTB are losing their grip, perpetuating so called "False Flags" and "Bling Bling" , but the masses are starting to use personal empowerment techniques, intuition, and seeing through all the deception.

edit on 3-6-2013 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by thedoctorswife
 

Like a John Titor moment?



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:13 PM
link   
reply to post by WilliamOckham
 



As soon as you threw "consciousness" and a few other new age phrases out there, I knew to stop reading.


WilliamOckham, it is a shame that you have made such a conclusion based upon your lack of information.

The majority of "New Age" concepts are actually more ancient than the religions of today. Most "New Age" concepts predate and can be found in Jainism, Buddhism, Daoism, Hinduism, and a multitude of mystical traditions from all corners of the world. Thousands of years old!!!

 

 




Discovery & enlightenment will come in the form it has always come....through science, critical thinking, logic and experimentation. The only thing meditation and spiritual exploration will get you, is better sleep and perhaps lower stress levels. Other than that, its a bunch of crap.


Not only have you shown ignorance in regards to the ancient roots of 'New Age' concepts, but now you have shown ignorance in the realm of Scientific experimentation of meditation.

Meditation has been found to actually change neuro-pathways in the brain, fundamentally changing the brain's physiology!!!

Since you are a man of science, here's a scientific conclusion discovered about meditation:

Mindfulness Meditation Training Changes Brain Structure in Eight Weeks (Science Daily Article)


May knowledge, understanding, and wisdom illuminate your ignorance.

Peace.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:19 PM
link   
All I get out of this is "learn to master your own body".
Or something to that effect, it's a bit ambiguous when
multiple levels of reality are superimposed on this notion.

Being a man of reason who follows scientific method,
how does one go about proving the existence of these realms?

You say that dreaming is you entering other realities,
when science has proved that your brain produces
Dimethyltryptamine that makes you hallucinate while your body rests.
Same could be used to explain meditations.
So, what then, are hallucinations a doorway to perceive another reality?
Should I really believe that it takes a foreign substance
to reveal to my mind what it doesn't normally perceive?
And if the substance is of a physical nature, and these other worlds truly do exist,
couldn't it be construed as a simple physical defect humans possess,
the inability to produce these chemical enzymes that "free the mind"?
Isn't it possible then to visit these "other realities" through our own use of
synthesized enzymes in this reality, without the need to transcend anything,
hence making the soul journey entirely pointless once civilization hits a point of
where chemistry becomes as easy as typing on a keyboard?

I'm not advocating the use of any foreign substance, I'm just poking a hole at the theory
as best as I can, it just happens to be the most convenient method of doing so.

So back to my main question, how do we go to prove that these other realities exist
without the use of synthesized enzymes? Don't say summoning entities,
for if you do, how do you know it is real and not a hallucination,
and if it is real, how do you know that they don't lie to you about the nature of the universe?

I'm on the fence on ghosts and other worldly beings here, I saw a spirit,
but I also just woke up, could've been Dimethyltryptamine residue causing a hallucination.
I have a serious lack of evidence to make the leap of faith and believe you.
I'm not asking for evidence, I'm asking for a process by which I can prove it to myself.


edit on 3-6-2013 by Radekus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Initiate
 


Could you describe, to the best of your abilities, the circumstances and events that have given you the expertise by which to both critically examine such materials as you have mentioned and accurately answer the questions posed by the ATS populace? A full review of your background would be nice. Consider this a screening.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Radekus

Being a man of reason who follows scientific method,
how does one go about proving the existence of these realms?

I'm not asking for evidence, I'm asking for a process by which I can prove it to myself.



I might be able to answer this from my perspective.

A very humbling experience of an involuntary OBE happened to me years ago. I posted it here on ATS.

But long story short it change my whole perspective on who I was.

There are some fantastic self-guided meditation/hypnosis, or whatever people would like to label them that will bring you to a new level of awareness.

So many audios, books and material out there that work well.

What it does, or did for me? Showed me that my body was just a shell, kind of like a car that you use for a few years then dispose of. Unfortunately we get deluded, deceived and forget when we are embodied, but that does not need to happen, because we do have options for remembering.

Peace out,

RT



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   
Hi initiate

It didn' t take you long to denigrate the role and identity of Christ Yehushua, and that is certainly nothing new nor surprising coming from an initiate, having apparently chosen by will to operate under the esoteric systems of practice.

Although you possess many truths with an impressive gift of communication, particularly in articulating the 'hidden' realms, non human entity presence/operation and the corruptions within organised religions, consider you too could have been misled in your perceptions of Christ by the same 'BM's' you are warning others here about.

The fact you admitted you were a soul capable of aligning very heavily for a period towards the 'frequencies' of evil, demonstrates that for all your intellect and knowledge you were not then and still appear not to be yet (by the impression left on your position regarding Christ) Aligned within the Foundational 'alpha root' knowledge of the identity, Purpose and function of Him Sent to be the living Positive, Loving Example of the Way, Truth and Life-- that we were and still are Called to Follow by our 'seed planting' Father of Creation.

May we resist all evil under the sun in which little has altered in our earthly spiritual design paradigm for millenia. We are still Called to the way of the Divine, or weaken in our will to be led astray in unholy temptations towards the ways/practices of the 'fallen' powers here in operation upon our flesh contained souls---powers that continually seek to siphon, overcome and snare souls through earthen incarnation cycles and furthermore seeking to rob us of our Salvation potential in better understanding the precepts of the Holy Kingdom's Grace, Mercy, Compassion accompanied with it's Instructions in following Kingdom Law also in our chosen deeds-- in order that we may be deemed Worthy via our efforts to not succumb too deeply to the sinful nature through our Love and Faith in our Creator (and via the Holy Spirit to recognise His Ordained Son) and being further enabled and strengthened via it's Holy Spirit as spiritual 'reward' for tuning towards it's Station by chosen will in a True knowledge Granted that we aim closer to the 'narrow path' of Virtuous Holy practice in our lives.

This is an interesting testimony and is included to be discerned and seeked upon if one chooses as with all that is shared.


The interview outlines testimony of how such 'initiates' have also been lied to in their undertakings by the spirits they commune with and by their human 'bloodline authority' figures. More traps than ever before in this great age of deceptions and much diligence in seeking Truth and Favour of the Holy Kingdom (by behaving in the loving ways of the Good Spirit exampled by Christ) are required for Blessings to be Poured upon to be 'Tuned' into the station that recognises evil in all it's signatures and frequencies to not ever abide with.

Woe will always be a companion to evil and I am glad for the ways you have repented thus far if your claims are true. We are all works in progress and regress.
edit on 3-6-2013 by PrimeLight because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   
Dear readers of ATS:

Some of you, unfortunately, are a little impatient, and I understand this. Some of you (understandably), are thinking "this is all new-age/non-scientific nonsense..."

I will brave a few remarks on this, before I proceed to complete this session by completing my response to user: Kgnow.

You might be very interested and fascinated to learn, that science and spirituality are not in the slightest incompatible with each other. It is a fiction and illusion (another tool in the vast tool kit of your 'masters,' let's just say) to create doubt in your minds, by making you think that the pathway to spirituality leads to a destiny not all that different from conventional religion, which leads us back into the dark ages.

How well I understand this sentiment, which is why, I will briefly address this, before going back to my strictly adhered to policy: chronological answering of questions asked.

Let's briefly discuss some things.

Firstly, science was not 'created' be scientists (or sophists/logicians/etc). It was created by (surprise, surprise!) esotericians of various orders (gnosticians/old-rosicrucians/old-masons/alchemists...)

Don't believe me? Why don't you investigate the life and times of Francis Bacon? While he certainly wasn't the first scientist (far from it), he certainly introduced the scientific method (observation-hypothesis-experiment-theory) to Europe, after it had drowned in the follies of the Dark Ages. It was (as a highly evolved soul), one of his voluntary tasks, while incarnated on Earth, to re-institute (yes, re-institute, science existed already with the old Pythagoreans thousands of years prior and even millions of years before that with the Atlanteans!) the scientific method in Europe.

In conventional history (mostly fairy tales and wives tales/gossip; don't believe me? Study the historiographic method, and learn how UNscientific conventional historical practices are. I have written several history papers myself at University, whilst an undergrad. I know the erroneous and primitive methods used by historians to establish the so-called muse of 'history' in your fairy tales of 'learning.') it is believed that the scientific method was a new and revolutionary insight to combat religious over-saturation and mental and emotional slavery by the Christian Church. This is only partially true.

The individuals who saved Europe were not scientists. They were the Old-Rosicrucians from the 14th Century onwards, established by the Bacons, along with the Old-Masonic (don't compare modern Masonry with old-Masonry, please. That would be an abomination) and Old-Gnostic orders. These were 'free-thinking' societies, established for and by the intellectual elite (beyond the mental level of some of the individuals in this forum, thinking they are clever and informed, because they follow conventional science, which isn't even what science is supposed to be: A place for free-thinking intellectuals, rather than a dogmatic, institutionalized slave-house!)

When I read people's posts, the authors of which are perhaps well-meaning but perversely misinformed, claiming superiority/reverence/knowledge in a field (like science) they don't even understand, I feel pity and sorrow, and I can only hope that you criticasters would cease your intellectual laziness and do some proper research as to our (humanity's) true history and legacy!

Leibniz was a Rosicrucian.

Goethe was a Rosicrucian.

Newton was an Alchemist and Esoterician

Leonardo Da Vinci was an Alchemist and Esoterician (some even would call him a magician!)

Francis Bacon was a Rosicrucian and a White Magician (adept of the right-hand path)

Galileo was an occultist

Einstein was a mysticist

Carl Sagan was an informed, cautious skeptic, bordering on mysticism

Emanuel Swedenborg was a mysticist

Pythagoras was a Hylozoician and White Magician

Jeshu was a Gnostician and a White Magician

Christos was an ascended Master

Enough!

No more!

Idiots will be idiots, & reason will not penetrate their brick-layered skulls!

But know this: Humanity was (and always will be) lifted to greater heights by the Spiritualists (my brothers) (Esotericians/Gnosticians/Rosicrucians of old (not the modern, perverted versions)/etc), not by your buffoon-like mediocrities that are:

Dawkins

Randi

Hitchens

Chomsky

Harris (I do think his heart is in the right place, though)

Krauss

Dennett

Blackmore

etc.


Even the likes of Feynman knew better, than to exercise such wanton stupidity.

The plastic heroes you cling on to, dear pseudo-skeptics, are not the individuals who propelled humanity forward to the scientific/technical achievements we all now benefit from. They emanated from a very small, select few group of spiritually enlightened souls, who were able to use their splendorous brilliance to assist us in our mindless struggles.

Show some appreciation, & leave your snide, impotent remarks for lesser minds to worry about (youtube would be a good cave for you troll in)!
edit on 3-6-2013 by Initiate because: added a couple more dunces to the list.



new topics

top topics



 
136
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join