It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by pstrron
I kind of wonder why the collapse of WTC7 is even still brought up. First of all Goldstein the owner publicly stated on TV that he gave the order for the building to be pulled which is a term for CD of the structure. In order for this to happen, it must have been already planned. Goldstein had also placed a multi-million dollar insurance policy on WTC 1, 2 and 7 three months prior to 9/11. After the collapses of all three buildings he received an $800 million dollar settlement. Follow the money.
In regards to WTC7, it was pulled, case closed.
It's been 12 years. You still can't even get his name right.
This is the truth movement in a nutshell.
Originally posted by Ghost375
This is such a unique and original thread....
I don't like calling people out for repeat threads, but seriously?
You've been here since 06. What are you thinking?
Originally posted by Hopechest
It seems to me that the OP has proven it wasn't a controlled demolition.
From his own example, he states how impossible it is to create a freefall into the buildings own footprint. If even professional demolition people can't do this with all the time in the world and in total public view, how would you expect a bunch of guys sneaking around during the early morning hours to wire a 100% perfect demolition?
Therefore the only explanation left is that it was a freak of nature, not a controlled demolition.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by reeferman
I always find it strange how there is always a presumption when it comes to 9/11 that anyone who believes the OS is some how ignorant. I have been researching 9/11 since it happened and was following Middle Eastern terrorism before 9/11. Yet you seem to presume that 14 minutes worth of video that's really just a regurgitation of stuff "truthers" have been saying for years is somehow going to change my mind.
I say to you that prior to 9/11 there had not been any significant terrorist attack against domestic American airlines and as such security was lax.
you respond with a list of every single significant Air craft hijacking in history, a video that seems to say Barbra Olson is someone else or a fake vitamin (didn't watch it), something about Northwood's and then a link about how two years before hand NORAD ran a exercise.
none of that means that pre and post 9/11 aircraft security was the same and that before 9/11 security on aircraft was just as strict as it is today.
in other words you have provided a bunch of links and videos that are just distraction's
I say to security was much more relaxed before 9/11 than it was today and you respond with stuff that's not really relevant
Originally posted by DeeKlassified
I don't know why you're even part of this debate if your mind is already made up on the OS?
Originally posted by drock905
Think about this....
If this was all a huge conspiracy pulled off by the government and GWs buddies why wouldn't they have planted WMDs in Iraq?