It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigyin
My money's on Eric Pickles shagging Theresa May.
bowk
The mechanics of that operation just boggles my mind!
Labour already helpfully briefing privately on implications of #DowningStAffair for PM. Tory irreconcilables laughing at his predicament.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
As far as I can tell, on a quick check, there is only one female Cabinet minister, which heavily reduces the options for heterosexual affairs.
Bet your bottom dollar there will be a few "terrorist Scares" this week to get it out of the news...
us plebs are more worried its not children as they seemed to be a lot of people in the jimmy savile fan club ?
Originally posted by MysterX
I'm more interested if they begin screwing the country, not too bothered if they're screwing each other.
Sex is sex, so what.
edit on 2-6-2013 by MysterX because: added text
Originally posted by MaChOMaNuGGeT
Hmm Whoever it is (Cameron/Brooks) i will tell you one thing..
Bet your bottom dollar there will be a few "terrorist Scares" this week to get it out of the news...
These #ers are so corrupt there needing one or two a week to hide there disgusting news..edit on 2-6-2013 by MaChOMaNuGGeT because: doh
Originally posted by DISRAELI
As far as I can tell, on a quick check, there is only one female Cabinet minister, which heavily reduces the options for heterosexual affairs.
If there's an injunction they might not need to distract us any further.
The Mail on Sunday has published one of the most intriguing of splashes. On a day when the news agenda has been dominated by cash-for-questions newspaper stings (in The Sunday Telegraph and Sunday Times), the Mail's story has tended to pass under the radar.
Of course, it could be nothing more than journalistic hype, but I somehow doubt that. It's not in the nature of the MoS editor, Geordie Greig. So what's it all about? What "legal reasons" prevent us from knowing more? Is there an injunction in place, an anonymised injunction possibly? I have asked and, as yet, no answers. I would guess that the MoS's lawyers have advised those in the know to say no more.
www.guardian.co.uk...