posted on Jun, 1 2013 @ 12:07 AM
As we all know, the majorities of problems that arise in this day and age have to do with the concept of money. From my perspective, as destructive
as it may seem, the destruction of the dollar would create an absolute collapse of the entire world, as we know it today. But with that collapse comes
a snowball effect of what humanity, as a whole, views as necessities to last as a functioning society and the opportunity to survive. However
promising this fairy tale of mine could be, it is not my main objective with this post.
A lot of recognizable names, mainly Steven Greer and David Icke, receive a bulls-eye from everyone on here as people that are only presenting
material in the hopes of receiving money from “gullible” donators that believe in their cause.
Like it or not, THIS IS THE WORLD WE LIVE IN THESE DAYS. To have anything presented or published, you have to have money. We don’t all have
obnoxious availabilities to money, like Foster Gamble, to release what was a really well presented documentary to the public. But how come his name
hasn’t become as popular as the likes of Greer or Icke? Probably because of the simple fact that his last is associated with money, being a Gamble
and all. More people recall the material in his documentary when you hear the name Thrive rather than who put it together. I do not claim to know all
of the facts associated with Gamble and would love to be told of any input into why he has not released any more material.
My point is this:
Foster Gamble released a good documentary in Thrive without asking for any funding on the part of the viewers. It is accepted by the majority and
has a large amount of beneficial material. However, whether or not you agree or disagree with the material he presented, his name is never under
scrutiny solely on the fact that he didn’t ask for you money. But his documentary is out there. If it is ever questioned, it is from what he
presented, not because of him as a person.
But then there’s Icke and Greer. They release essentially the same type of message, it doesn’t matter if it’s the exact same topic, overall it
steers towards a collective idea. But because Greer and Icke don’t have the same funding as a Gamble would have, their PERSONAS are place in-between
the crosshairs instead of the message they are trying to present. And I am sorry for the pound symbol later in this sentence, and I’m certainly not
a fanboy of Greer by any means, but you can # off if you think someone with MD makes anything near as much as someone within the Gamble family.
My whole point to this thread is to learn. I obviously have somewhat of a viewpoint on it, but I would just like to get opinions. It just appears
that presenters that ask for help get targeted more than their material. I’m sure Thrive received its fair amount of criticism but I haven’t
notice it being directed towards the presenter. Just would like everyone’s input haha.