It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If there's one nut left uncracked by Tesla Motors, it's the inherent range limits of electric vehicles. The Model S sedan can travel about 270 miles on a full charge, but the combination of lack of high-power vehicle plug-in stations and lengthy charging times keeps the Model S from being of use for a classic American road trip. Today, Tesla co-founder Elon Musk revealed the company would speed the expansion of its free Supercharger network to make a coast-to-coast journey viable within two years — and a new charging system that would drastically shorten how long Model S sedan owners would have to wait for juice.
Originally posted by HomoSapiensSapiens
Dang - this I can seriously see this guy's net worth increasing massively in the next 5-10+ years. He'll almost certainly become one of the richest men. Why? You only need look at the company he owns and the sectors he's in - that is, space, green tech etc. These sectors are indeed the big ones of the future and green tech is becoming more and more popular and he's clearly capitalizing on that.
If he plays it right, he can continue to expand and will only be made richer because of it whilst providing excellent and useful things to society (e.g. space rockets, green tech etc).
On a light-hearted, but related note - apparently, word on the street is that the Tony Stark in the Iron Man movies is said to be based on Elon Musk; in other words, the only billionaire alive today which most resembles Tony Stark is Elon Musk.edit on 5/31/2013 by HomoSapiensSapiens because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by redtic
While I don't think that money is his main motivator, that's certainly a byproduct of being intelligent, driven, passionate and innovative...
Originally posted by HomoSapiensSapiens
Tesla Motors which will continue to expand and has only got to be a good thing for the planet.
The authors of this new paper are evidently not saying that electric cars are "bad" for the environment in all circumstances, but they are confirming what many already knew: that as electric cars become more popular - which is being encouraged by policymakers across many countries - we mustn't lose sight of the fact that the carbon intensity of the electricity used to power them is key. Another crucially important factor to monitor (and, hopefully, ameliorate) is just how energy- and resource-intensive the production of these vehicles can be.
The problem for electric cars is that they will only increase their environmental credentials (compared to "conventional" cars) once more and more of them are made and used, which, in itself, will drive faster and deeper innovation in battery technology, production efficiencies and end-of-life recyclability. It's somewhat unfair to compare them to conventional cars at present because they are an immature, fledgling technology, but the opportunity for increased efficiency throughout their lifecycle seems significant as/if they become more popular.
But a bigger problem, perhaps, is that their environmental "success" hangs largely on factors beyond their manufacturers' control. As has been shown in China, electric cars powered by electricity generated through the burning of coal and oil make very little environmental sense. They need to run off a low-carbon, "smart" grid where renewables and nuclear do much of the heavy lifting. So policy-makers have a twin challenge if they want to see more people driving electric cars: they need to ensure a low-carbon, smart grid is delivered and they need to assist manufacturers in bringing down the cost of these vehicles. Doing that in a synchronised and timely manner is going to be hard, but a prize worth reaching for.
Originally posted by redtic
As the technology gets better and the price comes down, I can't see a reason for this not going mainstream in 5-10 years, and the other big players to follow.
Originally posted by SevenThunders
I like Elon Musk, he is the type of visionary we need in these times. However please let's not forget that Tesla motors was and is heavily subsidized by the state. On it's own it would have failed as a startup. The venture is not nearly profitable, even for the hefty cost of it's vehicles.
sadhillnews.com...
The sooner Tesla gets off the government teat and shows us a viable money making electric car the better.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
I think Tesla Motors SUCKS and deserves to fail. Why? None of the cars they make are affordable to anyone but the very rich.
The next Henry Ford.. more like the next PT Barnum.
There are FAR better technologies out there that can save us from the oil and gas giants. I own an electric bike myself and love it but the technology is not practical for cars yet and wont be for at least another 50 to 100 years. I'm 45.. sadly, I'll be dead by then.
I like the compressed air cars from MDI www.mdi.lu... Under 10,000 dollars for the Flow Air One which is a sporty convertible model.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by redtic
Lol that little tiny car would be useless here sad to say. The wind on a normal day would blow that thing off the road
Originally posted by redtic
Originally posted by TKDRL
Lol that little tiny car would be useless here sad to say. The wind on a normal day would blow that thing off the road
And which "little tiny car" are you referring to???
Originally posted by Hopechest
Henry Ford was worse than Hitler in many ways. You should not wish for someone like him to return.
Did you know that he had a department who's job was to go to employee homes and make sure they were living the appropriate lifestyle. If they smoked or drank too much they would be fired.