A clear case for an Abortion--but denied. And a Court that sounds like a NWO creation.

I'm against abortion as a means of birth-control.
That said, this case of an ill woman pregnant with an anencephalic fetus is as clear as it gets that abortion must be an alternative.

news.yahoo.com...

SAN JOSE (Reuters) - The regional human rights court for the Americas on Thursday told El Salvador it must let doctors perform an abortion on a woman carrying a seriously deformed fetus that has put her life at risk, but the Central American nation was not bound by the move.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights took the action after El Salvador's Supreme Court issued a ruling on Wednesday rejecting an appeal brought by the 22-year-old woman at the center of the case. She had sought an abortion even though El Salvador banned all types of abortion in 1999.

The woman uses the name "Beatriz" to protect her identity. Her fetus has a serious condition known as anencephaly that results in only partial brain development. Such a fetus has little or no chance of surviving after birth.

Beatriz, meanwhile, suffers from lupus and kidney problems, posing a grave threat to her own health....

Abortion or not, this is medical negligence towards that poor young women.

She still has her whole life ahead of her which is a thing that sadly this unborn child could never have, she deserves to be saved and healed.

Originally posted by theMediator
Abortion or not, this is medical negligence towards that poor young women.

She still has her whole life ahead of her which is a thing that sadly this unborn child could never have, she deserves to be saved and healed.

It's a bad law, not medical negligence. Two completely different things.

Originally posted by MuzzleBreak

Originally posted by theMediator
Abortion or not, this is medical negligence towards that poor young women.

She still has her whole life ahead of her which is a thing that sadly this unborn child could never have, she deserves to be saved and healed.

It's a bad law, not medical negligence. Two completely different things.

That's why I said "Abortion or not" ^^
I'm pro choice but even for someone pro life this situation has a clear solution and not taking this simple solution is a case of medical negligence.

Originally posted by theMediator

Originally posted by MuzzleBreak

Originally posted by theMediator
Abortion or not, this is medical negligence towards that poor young women.

She still has her whole life ahead of her which is a thing that sadly this unborn child could never have, she deserves to be saved and healed.

It's a bad law, not medical negligence. Two completely different things.

That's why I said "Abortion or not" ^^
I'm pro choice but even for someone pro life this situation has a clear solution and not taking this simple solution is a case of medical negligence.

edit on 30-5-2013 by theMediator because: (no reason given)

Negligence requires a duty to treat. The Law in question specifically denies abortion as an option. Just a matter of definitions.

Nothing good will come of the birth, and those stopping the abortion should me made to care for the child.

I am vehemently antiabortion in 99.99% of cases, but this case is one of the exceptions. This is exactly the sort of thing that abortion should be used for, if the mother wishes to pursue that option. This sort of scenario is just about the only case in which an abortion should even be considered, in my opinion.

Cases like this are the exact reason I am pro choice.

The El Salvador Health Dept has decided to let her have an early C-section.
www.bbc.co.uk...

I travel to Central America every year most if not all of the countries have laws against abortion and cases like this happen all of the time. That is what happens when politics mixes with religion IMO. Abortions are still performed throughout the religion they are just done in less than optimal conditions. Unfortunately this young lady is now in the spotlight and even those options are no longer available to her. I hope she survives this.