It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Wants His No-Fly Zone War Plan for Syria

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Obama Wants His No-Fly Zone War Plan for Syria


news.yahoo.com

U.S. President Barack Obama instructed the Pentagon to draw up plans for a no-fly zone inside Syria that would be enforced by the U.S. and other countries such as France and Great Britain, two administration officials told The Daily Beast in a report published Tuesday.
(visit the link for the full news article)

VIDEO:
edition.cnn.com...
edit on 28-5-2013 by CALGARIAN because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:11 PM
link   
www.haaretz.com...

www.theatlanticwire.com...

news.yahoo.com...

www.thedailybeast.com...


This of course don't apply to American Drones and Israeli Jets, but with the 2 close calls with missiles last week near commerical aircraft and possible incoming S300's and Long Range Missiles on Russia jets (or boats), NATO can no longer risk it. As well as all the death from above with their helicopters and jets on their own people.

200 people were killed late last year when helicopter attacked a line of people waiting for food and water. Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....

news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:15 PM
link   
No fly zone means only one . Good bye Assad !



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
I think most people do not support him, hilary clinton, john mccain and the other warmongers in washington.

I think people are sick and tired of sending financial and/or military assistance to the terrorists of the middle east.

I think people want their respective governments to focus on domestic issues and fix the economy. America is 16 trillion in the hole and unemployment continously rises.

We intervened in iraq twice, afghanistan, libya, somalia, serbia. egypt, tunisia, yemen, oman, etc. Let people take care of their own problems. All these nations are thousands of miles away from mainland america.

The european economy is not doing so hot either. Focus on europe.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 


This syria story really shows how the majority of the public either is naive or doesn't care.

Its an exact copy of the strategies used for all the other mideast countries started by GHW Bush in 1990.

How many days until they start showing the grizzly execution of Assad and some statue of him being pulled down by a crane.

In another 20 years they'll take out whatever they put in now with the same strategy.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....


They are not rebels. They are terrorists!



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:36 PM
link   
NATO and its Allies have been drillling a so called "No Fly Zone" for many months.

Those who follow the news should by now have come to the conclusion that a "No Fly Zone" can only achieved if and when the Russians decide to do so.

Upcoming hot spot " Pakistan" as was once mentioned a while ago by a member within the ats chat room.


Have a nice day :-)



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....


They are not rebels. They are terrorists!


Not all of them. If America started a back-lash, that's like saying "They're all bloods and crips".



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....


They are not rebels. They are terrorists!


Not all of them. If America started a back-lash, that's like saying "They're all bloods and crips".


Your analogy is wrong. If the majority of syrians wanted Assad removed I have little doubt they would gotten the job done by now. The army would have turned against Assad and he would have been toast.

The fact he still remains in power tells me the majority of the population supports him and so does the army. The army is smart enough to support the majority rather than the minority. The army does not want to be seen as unpopular.

We are causing problems in syria where non should exist. Assad is not a religious fanatic like the muslim brotherhood is. He is a secular leader!



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 04:50 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


I could post graphic images of what the so call "Liberation Army" is doing to "free" syrians. You all here should ask one another that why hasn't the media reported on the full blown murder and execution of Orthodox Christians ?. The media "WILL NOT" and has been directed to "NOT SHOW" images of executions and only a minor gourpo of media is uploadeding via various media outlets on such events. A prime example is the lates video from syrian rebells eating the heart from loyal syrian soldier. www.youtube.com... ( Need to log in to view )

You see this war is not about democracy or so called politics, its all about western funded Mercenaries who have outright ties to known Terroist groups with all the whistles and bells.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:05 PM
link   
I love the term "No Fly Zone". What does that mean, exactly? We're just going to "borrow" the air over your country for a while? We aren't intruding or landing on the ground or anything like that. No, we're just going to fly over your country some. Now, you may experience total destruction from the sky as a result, but don't let that bother you, our bombs are not boots and our feet will never touch the ground. And that makes it okay.

Lets be clear.

Invasion of another country is just that. If they called it that though it would seem wrong to most peoples eyes so we give it an innocuous name. That way it's an easier bitter pill to swallow for those who still hold regard for the definition of International Law and National Sovereignty.

An "Only We Fly Zone" is what tipped the tables in Libya. Its what they been chomping at the bit for and denied in the UN by the Security Council on a number of occasions. Without a mandate (real or imagined), it will be nigh impossible to "finish" the Syrians as a country. Guerrilla wars from outside are insurgencies, not "rebellions". They cannot hope to win without the support of the people and or the military.

Thats why we keep hearing about it from the collaborative mass media. Just an excuse to begin bombing.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....


They are not rebels. They are terrorists!


Not all of them. If America started a back-lash, that's like saying "They're all bloods and crips".


Really? are you that sheep still? no offence, can you name one moderate FSA brigade?



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:08 PM
link   
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


Majority of Americans don't trust the Obama administration. Yet he still remains in office like Assad.

Just because he is still in power does dont mean that the majority doesent want him there , they're just too coward or lazy to do a damn thing about it...... If you rebel you will be labeled a domestic terrorist , stripped of your rights and dragged down the pavement



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07

Originally posted by CALGARIAN

Yet I guess most of you will blame that on the rebels as well....


They are not rebels. They are terrorists!


Not all of them. If America started a back-lash, that's like saying "They're all bloods and crips".


Really? are you that sheep still? no offence, can you name one moderate FSA brigade?


I don't need to, mainly cause I cannot. Maybe Free Syrian army lol.

It's just you cannot classify the whole "rebellion" as all al-queda, no home-grown fathers and brothers who are just sick of all the sh|t



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:14 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 


Dangerous things going on there. Wonder if China and Russia have drawn-up war plans for may?



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by noissucnoc16
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
 


Majority of Americans don't trust the Obama administration. Yet he still remains in office like Assad.

Just because he is still in power does dont mean that the majority doesent want him there , they're just too coward or lazy to do a damn thing about it...... If you rebel you will be labeled a domestic terrorist , stripped of your rights and dragged down the pavement


I hate to sound cynical but I have the feeling most people who voted for Obama still support him. Liberals tend to be over-emotional and pseudo-humanitarian whenever it suits them. Look at gun control, look at the middle east, etc.

If lord Obama says something it is *the voice of god* incarnate for them.

Most of the real opposition to lord obama is from occupy and the tea party. Occupy tends to vote left leaning third parties and tea party is a reformation branch of the republicans. The mainstream liberals all support lord obama. The mainstream conservatives are still stuck on gun control and could care less about anything else.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:38 PM
link   



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 05:45 PM
link   
reply to post by CALGARIAN
 





It's just you cannot classify the whole "rebellion" as all al-queda, no home-grown fathers and brothers who are just sick of all the sh|t

The Free Syrian Army, the SNC are nothing more then Muslim Brotherhood stooges.




all al-queda, no home-grown fathers and brothers who are just sick of all the

Yeah i heard this one to in Libya i am not falling it again.



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 06:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrptr
I love the term "No Fly Zone". What does that mean, exactly? We're just going to "borrow" the air over your country for a while? We aren't intruding or landing on the ground or anything like that. No, we're just going to fly over your country some. Now, you may experience total destruction from the sky as a result, but don't let that bother you, our bombs are not boots and our feet will never touch the ground. And that makes it okay.

Lets be clear.

Invasion of another country is just that. If they called it that though it would seem wrong to most peoples eyes so we give it an innocuous name. That way it's an easier bitter pill to swallow for those who still hold regard for the definition of International Law and National Sovereignty.

An "Only We Fly Zone" is what tipped the tables in Libya. Its what they been chomping at the bit for and denied in the UN by the Security Council on a number of occasions. Without a mandate (real or imagined), it will be nigh impossible to "finish" the Syrians as a country. Guerrilla wars from outside are insurgencies, not "rebellions". They cannot hope to win without the support of the people and or the military.

Thats why we keep hearing about it from the collaborative mass media. Just an excuse to begin bombing.


A no fly zone has nothing to do with us bombing them or borrowing their airspace. It is exactly as it sounds, no unauthorized flights allowed in the airspace. Authorization comes from of course, you know who, us! So we basically stop all of these attacks that have happened/are anticipated by shooting down anything not authorized. At least that's my understanding. As far as whether it's politically, morally or in any other way right or wrong, I have no comment on, just wanted to give a little info if it could help.

Ghost

edit on 28-5-2013 by TheCrimsonGhost because: spelling



posted on May, 28 2013 @ 07:32 PM
link   
reply to post by TheCrimsonGhost
 

Well that was the result in Libya. We overstepped the UN mandate from simply providing cover for a "humanitarian corridor" to invasion and overthrow of Libya. Thats why the Chinese and Russians vetoed it this time in the UN Security Council meetings on it.

Won't get fooled again.

We want it in Syria for the same reason, to overthrow the country. I know the term is benign sounding, but it is designed that way to deceive. Its a foot in the door that will lead to wider conflict. "Just please give us the little opening..."

then anything is justified.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join