Proof Enough That Bomb Site #1 Was Closed Off To The General Public.

page: 2
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 29 2013 @ 03:42 AM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee


No but I was talking ODDS. ODDS that anyone specifically would be in that area at that moment out of all the people involved.

 


We calculated the square footage and the type of explosion, and compared it to the number of casualties in another thread.

There is no such thing as "odds" when someone is actively choosing the site the IED is set at. It all boils down to how many people were in the area, or how many people could fit in the given area, and the blast radius vs. the type of explosive used.

You can look it up in the RATS forum near the end of the thread I created. What you are talking about, makes no sense.

You don't simply make up "odds" when someone was running around with an IED, planting it in a specific location with intent. It's absurd.




posted on May, 29 2013 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Char-Lee


No but I was talking ODDS. ODDS that anyone specifically would be in that area at that moment out of all the people involved.

 


We calculated the square footage and the type of explosion, and compared it to the number of casualties in another thread.

There is no such thing as "odds" when someone is actively choosing the site the IED is set at. It all boils down to how many people were in the area, or how many people could fit in the given area, and the blast radius vs. the type of explosive used.

You can look it up in the RATS forum near the end of the thread I created. What you are talking about, makes no sense.

You don't simply make up "odds" when someone was running around with an IED, planting it in a specific location with intent. It's absurd.


Well I guess I think what you just stated is absurd. Taking the time to figure up the "odds" of any one person who was there having been hurt is absurd to me and not seeing a general statement of it being "absurd" for any one person there to feel it was a m"miracle" it was not them dead 3 out of 530,00ish is absurd.

SO each to their own I guess!



posted on May, 29 2013 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by CasaVigilante
 


The thread should not be called a lie in any manner as the term from your OP, can mean proof enough for yourself, for some of us or for all of us. I don't see a ludicrous lie here and I am saddened that there is even a forum to call a persons thread by such a name when in an appropriate forum.
This clearly belongs under conspiracy where it should be discussed by those interested.



the fact that there is proof enough that bomb site #1 had been closed off to the general public.



con·spir·a·cy



con·spir·a·cy the·o·ry Noun A belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for an unexplained event.



World English Dictionary conspiracy theory — n the belief that the government or a covert organization is responsible for an event that is unusual or unexplained, esp when any such involvement is denied



5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

dictionary.reference.com...



posted on Jun, 24 2013 @ 04:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Urantia1111
reply to post by CasaVigilante
 


Yes. As you have discovered, ATS has created a new forum for squelching of topics that they themselves have declared off-limits for discussion. Sandy Hook was the original event that sparked interest in creation of such a forum. Boston Marathon was the deciding factor. We are simply not permitted to question Official Stories of either of these events. It is because there is so much to hide and ATS admin is directly involved in the censorship.


i have satisfied myself that both 'events' were faked/staged with no 'real' victims. i am not stupid
nor did i set out looking for this type 'conspiracy'.
the fact the level of censorship quoted above is in place here tells
me all i need to know.
someone doesn't want you knowing about media fakery.

i wonder how many other 'events' were faked to effect policy change?



posted on Jun, 24 2013 @ 05:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by CasaVigilante
 


The thread should not be called a lie in any manner as the term from your OP, can mean proof enough for yourself, for some of us or for all of us. I don't see a ludicrous lie here and I am saddened that there is even a forum to call a persons thread by such a name when in an appropriate forum.
This clearly belongs under conspiracy where it should be discussed by those interested.



the fact that there is proof enough that bomb site #1 had been closed off to the general public.



con·spir·a·cy



con·spir·a·cy the·o·ry Noun A belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for an unexplained event.



World English Dictionary conspiracy theory — n the belief that the government or a covert organization is responsible for an event that is unusual or unexplained, esp when any such involvement is denied



5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

dictionary.reference.com...


i agree. and i don't get it.
...unless.

is the OP now banned?
well, well.



posted on Jun, 24 2013 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


I don't know, maybe just left gave up on ATS, so many people act like we who see deception here are monsters and they readily say so. I personally feel they all must be blind.



posted on Jun, 24 2013 @ 07:31 PM
link   
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Take a look at some of these pictures what do you think?
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 24 2013 @ 09:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Take a look at some of these pictures what do you think?
www.abovetopsecret.com...


i think you are the right track char-lee, although it seems you had
better keep your mouth shut if you value your membership here.

sandy hook and boston were 100% faked/staged non-events and we do find some
of the same players/actors popping throughout all these various psy-ops.



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 02:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Take a look at some of these pictures what do you think?
www.abovetopsecret.com...


i think you are the right track char-lee, although it seems you had
better keep your mouth shut if you value your membership here.

sandy hook and boston were 100% faked/staged non-events and we do find some
of the same players/actors popping throughout all these various psy-ops.


You have evidence of these things being 100% fake/staged event or do you just rely on foolish youtube videos which have been debunked/explained by rational people, which are not even held on to anymore by even the most avid CT crowd?

I know. We should just simply believe it is, because you say it is. Okay.
edit on 25-6-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 04:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne

Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Take a look at some of these pictures what do you think?
www.abovetopsecret.com...


i think you are the right track char-lee, although it seems you had
better keep your mouth shut if you value your membership here.

sandy hook and boston were 100% faked/staged non-events and we do find some
of the same players/actors popping throughout all these various psy-ops.


You have evidence of these things being 100% fake/staged event or do you just rely on foolish youtube videos which have been debunked/explained by rational people, which are not even held on to anymore by even the most avid CT crowd?

I know. We should just simply believe it is, because you say it is. Okay.
edit on 25-6-2013 by boncho because: (no reason given)


plenty of sound and overwhelming evidence is available at the
likes of letsrollforums.com.

do you suggest that the official stories we have been fed are on the level?

where do you stand on the 9/11 official conspiracy theory, out of interest?



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 07:15 PM
link   
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne


plenty of sound and overwhelming evidence is available at the
likes of letsrollforums.com.

 


If you knew you would post specifics, but you don't. Therefore your opinion has been made most likely without such. No?




do you suggest that the official stories we have been fed are on the level?



I heard it was going to be 93 on the news today but they were 5 degrees off.





where do you stand on the 9/11 official conspiracy theory, out of interest?



Entirely irrelevant.

Where do you stand on WW1?



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 09:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne


plenty of sound and overwhelming evidence is available at the
likes of letsrollforums.com.

 


If you knew you would post specifics, but you don't. Therefore your opinion has been made most likely without such. No?




do you suggest that the official stories we have been fed are on the level?



I heard it was going to be 93 on the news today but they were 5 degrees off.





where do you stand on the 9/11 official conspiracy theory, out of interest?



Entirely irrelevant.

Where do you stand on WW1?


where you stand on 9/11 will give me an idea of the type of character i am
dealing with. i have learned not to engage lightly, as the internet is infested
with disinformation operatives (who get paid by the post yegads!) and i am
especially aware of how the whole media fakery angle to these many operations
is viewed here and is dealt with in general. so needs must i tread carefully.

i have no need to convince you of what i am myself convinced of. nor have i the
inclination to. i already gave you a link. go seek out the threads yourself. there
is alot of good analysis and unavoidable conclusions reached there...if it's the truth
you are really after.

when the (obvious) truth is labelled a ludicrous (online) lie, then you know it
is time to wake alice from her dream.



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 09:09 PM
link   
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Yeah... I don't talk with those people either. I'm afraid of contracting HAARPies.



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 09:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by TopsyTurvyOne
 


Yeah... I don't talk with those people either. I'm afraid of contracting HAARPies.


Comedy Gold Bo, just like your circumference!

and shouldn't that be MUDDYTHEWATERitis?
(maybe not. you probably already have that!).



posted on Jun, 25 2013 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Ahhhhh summertime


I was gonna add more to that... but it kinda says it all...






new topics
top topics
 
1
<< 1   >>

log in

join