posted on May, 27 2013 @ 04:19 PM
Originally posted by Sankari
Originally posted by jude11
And what you have posted is nothing but the court (assumed) claims.
There is nothing 'assumed' here and this has nothing to do with 'taking sides.' It's about with verifiable facts.
You posted a sensationalised report from a Russian government-owned propaganda channel which did not tell the full story and misrepresented the little
that it told.
I have provided with two independent sources confirming details of the case which were voluntarily made public by the court. These same sources
confirmed that the government has acted immediately to improve the processes of the court and ensure greater transparency.
There is no reason to doubt these details and every reason to believe them. If you believe these details are wrong, please prove it. Until then you
are stuck with the fact that you were wrong about this case.
edit on 27/5/13 by Sankari because: (no reason given)
It is not sensationalist at all! I mean if ever there was someone I would claim to be a shill it is you... What the hell are you even on about? The
ladies DAD was being forced from his home and family! You tell me what you would do in the same situation?
You actually even think that someone upset by her dad being kidnapped and locked up should be sent to prison for an angry phonecall?
I am at a loss here, you have got to be on a wind up or shilling, there is no other explanation I can think of!
I mean she spoke to her ******** DAD? Yeah that is terrible, lock her up!!! How dare she defy the courts like that!!!
You are one piece of work I can tell you that!