Flying Saucer Photographed - Santee, California May 22, 2013 - QUALITY

page: 1
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 23 2013 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Reminds me of the Vancouver footage from years ago. The fact that this woman does not want to be public is a sign she is not doing this for attention or fame. The object remained motionless according to her.





posted on May, 23 2013 @ 03:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Reminds me of the Vancouver footage from years ago. The fact that this woman does not want to be public is a sign she is not doing this for attention or fame. The object remained motionless according to her.



Not looking for fame?
1. Telling her name
2. Telling her location
3. Being on camera
4. Talking on camera
5. Is in a place that claims to be haunted
6. Is running out of business
7. Adds UFOs
8. Doesn't show her face to make you think she doesn't want to be in public despite the ridiculous points above that shows otherwise
9. Point 8 is advanced enough to lure in idiots
10. More business as new visitors come check out the magical place.

What made you post this story?
edit on 23-5-2013 by Nevertheless because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 04:17 PM
link   
looks like a blimp to me, dunno what else to say about it



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by HomerinNC
looks like a blimp to me, dunno what else to say about it




Blimp? Please.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Got double threads www.abovetopsecret.com... on the same event running here, this one's first.



As I said we'll probably never know either way without proper analysis on the photo but I do find it interesting she wishes to remain anonymous


edit on 23-5-2013 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 07:03 PM
link   
1 photograph?

Think about it if you saw a flying saucer would you only take 1 pic?

Her entire witness testimony amounted to 1 sentence.."what was it doing there?"

This is just publicity for the ghost businesses.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 11:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
Got double threads www.abovetopsecret.com... on the same event running here, this one's first.



As I said we'll probably never know either way without proper analysis on the photo but I do find it interesting she wishes to remain anonymous


edit on 23-5-2013 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)


Yep. What say 'da Mods?



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 11:47 PM
link   
I think it looks like a blimp too, the military is working on transport blimps, it could be that or a scaled down test model.



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 11:47 PM
link   
What amazes me is here we have a great video, daytime, no obvious staging, a news report with valid news coverage - and no one cares, lol!

Do I believe this is a UFO? You bet.

Do I believe it's extraterrestrial?

Why the hell not.

peace



posted on May, 23 2013 @ 11:59 PM
link   
Thread exists here

Courtesy of the search police

and yes looks like she wants her 15 minutes



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 02:14 AM
link   


Yep. What say 'da Mods?

Moderators keep the site clean , they are not all knowing beings .
it looks pretty legit to my old eyes.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 02:48 AM
link   
Hoax:


The Camera360 phone app strikes again. Ohio’s WMFD News recently featured the story of a man who said he captured a UFO in a picture he took with his tablet while vacationing in California. However, the UFO image is one that comes with the Camara360 photo app for smartphones.

Open Minds recently featured other UFO and alien photos that were taken with this app and purported to be real. We were even approached at the UFO Congress by a young woman who said she had caught an alien in a photograph, but it turned out to be a joke she was playing on us and her parents using the Camera360 app.

www....(nolink)/fake-california-ufo-photo-fools-ohio-tv-news-1023/

(Search the link on Google, you should find the article.)



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 02:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nevertheless

Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Reminds me of the Vancouver footage from years ago. The fact that this woman does not want to be public is a sign she is not doing this for attention or fame. The object remained motionless according to her.



Not looking for fame?
1. Telling her name
2. Telling her location
3. Being on camera
4. Talking on camera
5. Is in a place that claims to be haunted
6. Is running out of business
7. Adds UFOs
8. Doesn't show her face to make you think she doesn't want to be in public despite the ridiculous points above that shows otherwise
9. Point 8 is advanced enough to lure in idiots
10. More business as new visitors come check out the magical place.

What made you post this story?
Promoting the museum also occurred to me.

This story is terribly lacking in simple details like-
Did she see it approach?
Did she see it leave? If so how quickly?

And her camera broke? Really? I mean cameras break I guess if you drop them or something, but saying her camera broke is a big red flag for me that something is fishy.

There are 3 photos posted at the new link:
www.10news.com...-2
EXIFtools shows the png files are marked "Software:Adobe ImageReady"
So I think it's safe to say no original photos on the 10news.com site.

It is odd that she says it's not a bug. This only invokes more questions about the behavior of what she saw before and after she photographed it, which is a glaring omission in the story.


Originally posted by extraterrestrialentity
Hoax:
Sorry, I don't follow your post. That link is about a different UFO, though if you scroll down to the bottom, there's a link to the story about the UFO that's the subject of this thread. And when you open that one, it doesn't say anything about a hoax, though as my post suggests, I think there's plenty of reason to be skeptical.
edit on 24-5-2013 by Arbitrageur because: clarification



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 03:26 AM
link   
Thats an Insect



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 03:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Arbitrageur
 

I thought they were using that picture as an example.

But still, this photo is probably a hoax. The way the UFO looks makes it appear too much like CGI.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 04:13 AM
link   
reply to post by CigaretteMan
 


Any report like this is pointless without info ie the exif data if taken with a digital camera with that we find out make ,model,time,date, focal length, iso rating ,shutter speed ,aperture ,if digital zoom was used with that it can be possible to give an estimate how far that object was from the camera ie was it behind the barn or closer to the camera.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 05:20 AM
link   
I just dig saucers..Pleiadean beam ships, a very sexy design if you ask me.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 06:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by HomerinNC
looks like a blimp to me, dunno what else to say about it


 




thats my take on the object too...


likely a long duration surveillance platform to hover over some area to direct 'drone' aircraft which track 'people of interest'.... the blimp will only be witnessed when its first launched and is climbing to its high altitude station
which seems to be the case here with this news report sighting
edit on 24-5-2013 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 07:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by bigfootgurl


Blimp? Please.


Looks like Swamp gas to me.



posted on May, 24 2013 @ 12:26 PM
link   
why do photos get so much attention when good UFO videos are a) more prevalent b) harder to fake ?





new topics
top topics
 
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join