Originally posted by The X
You don't get it, the terminology for the denial by a whole religious demograph for the crimes in which they are complicit doesn't exist "Holocaust
denial" is the closest terminology the person who wrote the article could use to approach (A) The scale of denial, and, (B) The severity of their
dis-association from the reality of the radicalisation, and, the truth in action of that same radicalisation, with the concurrent responsibilities and
This is a syntactically muddled paragraph, but from what I can see you are attempting to suggest that the "whole religious demograph"[sic] - ie all
muslims - are "complicit" in this crime.
That's absolute nonsense, even by the standards of your tortured logic. Almost every major social and religious body pertaining to Islam in the UK
has condemned the murder in the strongest possible terms. No facet of mainstream Islam has done anything except express abject disgust.
And where do you get your understanding that most of the muslims are peaceful?.
At best anyone who is in denial of the acts are at best complicit, and those who won't condemn them, are also complicit.
Sort of. But those people are in a tiny minority. Pretending that most muslims are bloodthirsty maniacs is a simple lie. And trying to create the
impression that a billion people are responsible for a murder by failing as a group to satisfy your (invented) criteria for apology is mendacious.
What would satisfy you that an individual isn't complicit? Should all muslims sign a letter of condolence? Or perhaps they have to come to your house
and tell you in person?
I haven't seen a personal apology from you condemning the activities of Fred Phelps. Am I free to assume you are complicit in his outrages?
And please show me with links the most retarded aspects of christianity in action, as far as i can see things like.
“Look, I have two daughters, virgins both of them. Let me bring them out to you and you could do what you like with them. But do nothing to these
men because they have come under the shelter of my roof.”
Have become nothing more than talking points for christian scholars as the christian faith has modernised, unfortunately however,
From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam Islamic Witch Hunts (United Kingdom)
you see although "Christianity" has some very stupid edicts, the progressives have made the rest see sense, and the worst parts of the bible have
literally been left in the dust.
why can't Islam own up to the fact that it is NOT the perfect religion of peace, also, that they deceive themselves, and become P R O G R E S S I V E
is that too much to ask a bunch of medieval bandits in a country of the 21st century?.
So let me get this straight. All muslims adhere to and are responsible for the crazy stuff in the Quran because it's there. But the presence of crazy
stuff in the Bible is evidence of Christians' moderation?
Islam is arguably a less progressive religion as a whole than Christianity. But I don't see much that's liberal or free-thinking in swathes of
christianity or the way it acts to legitimise barbarian foreign policy or repressive social engineering (big cheer for the anti-contraceptive movement
in Africa, for example).
If you want to drill down to individual atrocities and then try to link them to the participation of an entire, enormous, diverse religion then I'm
afraid I can't see the point. I fail to see for example, what the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests has to do with my Christian cousin.
Or what the exorcism and eventual murder of Kristy Bamu by his Christian Zealot relatives has to do with the an anglican in Australia.
Or how christians in, say, China should go about apologising for the activities of Warren Jeffs.
Just as I fail to see what a lamentable murder in South London has to do with a Malaysian businessman or an Indonesian pastry chef. If it's just that
they share a religion - well, my mother shares a religion with David Koresh, but she has yet to hole herself up and start stockpiling guns.
I think that for some reason you are asking more of individual muslims than you are of Christians. For some reason they all share complicity, whereas
Christians don't. Why do you think this? Is it simple prejudice?