It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The question mark on the end doesn't make it a question.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
If you watch the video at the news link, the ALLEGATIONS by the families are there.
And ABC news, who did the interview, says that it is the team that took out UBL.
Someone gave the orders to withdraw support for the team.
The possible conspiracy ... shadow gov't/NWO (which you've said you don't believe in)
getting rid of those who took place in the UBL raid because the UBL-death story
is wrong and/or fabricated. Or getting rid of them for another reason.
OR the other possible conspiracy ... someone in the military screwed up and didn't
give our Seals/Special Ops teams adequate cover like they usually get ... and then
they failed to investigate .. (or covered it up)
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by redtic
But you *want* it to be true, now don't you??
That was a statement. The question mark on the end doesn't make it a question.
The intent was clear.
Originally posted by muse7Lol By adding "-gate" to everything, it really shows how desperate you people really are. Here's a little factoid for you.When helicopters suffer a mechanical malfunction while in flight, they tend to come down and crash and depending on the altitude and speed that the helicopter was going the occupants might not survive.
But I know that you get off on the impeachment porn that right wing blogs keep feeding you.
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault.
It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack.
..........
What Petraeus decided to do with that request is the pivotal moment in the controversy over the administration’s Benghazi talking points. It was from his initial input that all else flowed, resulting in 48 hours of intensive editing that congressional Republicans cite as evidence of a White House coverup.
www.washingtonpost.com... 7813_story.html
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by MrSpad
1 - I am a veteran of the US miltiary (Army). I do indeed understand that errors happen on the battlefield .. that there are investigations ... that some of the investigations result in cover ups.
2 - I stated very clearly that I am not believing or disbelieving the article. It's only here for discussion.
3 - I also stated very clearly that I dont think the Seal Team 6 controversy would go all the way to Obama. I've said that he is not exactly a 'hands on' kind of guy with the military.
4 - If you had read the thread, you would have known all that.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
heck he's probably never even heard of them - the stories that is.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by MrSpad
1 - I am a veteran of the US miltiary (Army). I do indeed understand that errors happen on the battlefield .. that there are investigations ... that some of the investigations result in cover ups.
2 - I stated very clearly that I am not believing or disbelieving the article. It's only here for discussion.
3 - I also stated very clearly that I dont think the Seal Team 6 controversy would go all the way to Obama. I've said that he is not exactly a 'hands on' kind of guy with the military.
4 - If you had read the thread, you would have known all that.
I read the title. Then I tried to read the idiocy that followed in the thread. If you were in the military then you know the entire things is complete BS so why bother to post it.