It seems like most of the events in the news lately that are considered to be false flags or conspiracies by some folk here, contain such an unusual
amount of coincidences and abnormalities that coming to any other conclusion is illogical. I mean really, how is it that people still defend the
"official" story when you take a step back and look at all these events, how they were handled by the media and presented by the authorities…
The Tucson Shooting
Fast and Furious
The Aurora Massacre
The mall shooting in Oregon
The Boston Marathon bombing and subsequent events
The AP phone-tapping & IRS scandals… etc.
Sure, when you focus on one event at a time and pick it apart or "debunk" it piece by piece, you can really explain everything. It might take you a
few days, and you may have to pull some things out of your arse, but you can get the job done. However, I think Occam's Razor seems to point to the
idea that there are secret forces behind these events that are exploiting their outcomes for political gain… see much easier. There is no need to
give the spokeshole the benefit of the doubt anymore. Anyone that can't see the dark side yet is either being intentionally deceitful, or willfully
ignorant. I'll try to explain my position here with this little tidbit…
I got into the whole "conspiracy" game after a friend told me to watch Loose Change. It blew my mind because I thought that even if some of these
things can be "debunked"… not all of them can. All it takes is for one of those "facts" to be a FACT and it destroys the entire "official" story.
So, you're telling me that this movie that presents "fact" after "fact", for about 2 hours, does not contain one actual FACT?? Get real. Of course, I
tried all I could to read the other side of the story before coming to a conclusion and forming an opinion. What I found was that all the "9/11
DEBUNKED!!" articles only talked about a few of the "facts". I'm sorry, but if you want to debunk 9/11, you need to address EVERYTHING. Not just
certain points that could make sense if you ignore everything else… and forget about the laws of physics at the same time.
The same logic applies to all of the aforementioned events. How can the "false flaggers" possibly prove that something did not happen the way it is
presented. The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim. The "false flaggers" and conspiracy crowd are not making the claim in these
instances. They are only reacting to a claim made by the authorities that makes no sense, presents us with zero evidence, has come from unnamed
sources, and will influence policy in the future. Don't forget that the media and government have a proven history of lying to us as well. As the
saying goes, "fool me once"…
Sorry, I will not provide any specific examples or links to these "coincidences". There are numerous threads on all these events and I can't possibly
condense all that information. It took me months just to read it all. Besides, this is about ALL of the inconsistencies, not just a few that I pick.
This is about how all these events are just too convenient to be believable anymore. If you want to argue about whether the event is a false flag or
conspiracy, go to those threads. I'll consider it a trolling tactic here and ignore you.
edit on 23-5-2013 by Frettin because: (no reason