It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

California Police Beat Man Nearly To Death For Asking To Read His Ticket

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:29 AM
link   
Truck Driver Beaten For Asking To Read Ticket

Here we go again... Same old boring news. Cops beating innocent people.




posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:32 AM
link   
Can you quote it? please



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:38 AM
link   
There's got to be more to it then what the article says.

Perhaps the driver got mouthy and violent? Either way, it doesn't justify the cops beating him but in the same breath did the man act unreasonably?



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:38 AM
link   
California's finest. This is sad. But I would love to see if there are additional sources. This is a crazy case because I hate police who go berserk and attack for no real reason. Defending yourself is one thing, attacking is different.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by Casualboy100
Can you quote it? please


(Quote) from the article:

"On September 2nd, 2011, Russian immigrant Olegs Kozacenko was driving his truck when he was pulled over by Officer Andrew P. Murrill of the California Highway Police. Murrill attempted to ticket him for driving too many hours in the truck. Kozacenko refused to sign the ticket before reading it." (unquote)

I think the police exhibited misplaced anger; or maybe the Policeman was just a jerk!


edit on 22-5-2013 by caladonea because: edit


edit on 22-5-2013 by caladonea because: edit



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:41 AM
link   
And how convenient:

Police officials claim that there is no video of the altercation and that all associated radio logs have been deleted by system malfunctioning for this time period.”


This is crazy, this man was seriously messed up:

"injuries including a crushed left orbital eye socket, multiple facial fractures, a broken left arm, a concussion, unconsciousness and possible neurological damage.”


I find it hard to believe that he was

“actively resisting” and “exhibiting extraordinary strength”
.

Just another case of cops going overboard and beating people for failure to obey them in every and all instances. Contempt of cop. "Don't read it! Sign it! NOW" "Do what i say! Now!"

And these cops still have their jobs, apparently:

Murrill and Sherman remain employed by the CHP.


In court testimony,

Murrill admitted that he was confused, either by the law governing the hour limits for truck drivers or by reading the truck driver’s log book. Murrill also admitted on the witness stand that he was not a trained commercial vehicle specialist and did not call to ask for a commercial vehicle specialist to help at the scene.


This cop needs to be fired, sued, cover medical expenses, and get anger management counseling.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Do you think you could maybe quote something from the article and give your opinion instead of posting a link and a line?



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluestar.ranch


Here we go again... Same old boring news. Cops beating innocent people.



I would like to know what you think about all of this; what are your opinions?



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by caladonea

Originally posted by Casualboy100
Can you quote it? please


(Quote) from the article:

"On September 2nd, 2011, Russian immigrant Olegs Kozacenko was driving his truck when he was pulled over by Officer Andrew P. Murrill of the California Highway Police. Murrill attempted to ticket him for driving too many hours in the truck. Kozacenko refused to sign the ticket before reading it." (unquote)

I am wondering if the police were so violent with him because he was a Russian immigrant; and the Boston Bombers were Russian immigrants too. I think the police exhibited misplaced anger.


edit on 22-5-2013 by caladonea because: edit


Interesting story but I think you are off by about a year for it to have been associated with the Boston bombing.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Do you think you could maybe quote something from the article and give your opinion instead of posting a link and a line?


I would love to give my opinion..but I placed a link to the entire story in place of my personal opinion. (If I give my opinion the mods will delete the thread and ban me) So read this if its interesting to you. I CANT express my opinions any more the way I want to freely... ATS is changing....(but that's my opinion)



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluestar.ranch

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Do you think you could maybe quote something from the article and give your opinion instead of posting a link and a line?


I would love to give my opinion..but I placed a link to the entire story in place of my personal opinion. (If I give my opinion the mods will delete the thread and ban me) So read this if its interesting to you. I CANT express my opinions any more the way I want to freely... ATS is changing....(but that's my opinion)

Why would the mods ban you for giving your opinion..?



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 11:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vasa Croe


Interesting story but I think you are off by about a year for it to have been associated with the Boston bombing.


You are so right! My mistake...I need my second cup of coffee! I do think I am right about the Police exhibiting misplaced anger though or...maybe the guy is just a jerk!



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 11:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Havox

Originally posted by bluestar.ranch

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Do you think you could maybe quote something from the article and give your opinion instead of posting a link and a line?


I would love to give my opinion..but I placed a link to the entire story in place of my personal opinion. (If I give my opinion the mods will delete the thread and ban me) So read this if its interesting to you GOOD I CANT express my opinions any more the way I want to freely... ATS is changing....(but that's my opinion)

Why would the mods ban you for giving your opinion..?


Because many threads that are against "cultural normal" responses are not acceptable to print. For an example: the little 8 year old girl that was murdered on her wedding night? I wanted to say "maybe the arsehole should have pleasured himself with one of his goats after molesting the child instead of murdering her....It might be racist to say that some middle eastern people raise goats.... But I did not want to post that... It was my "opinion:"

Therefore the mods restrict what can be said, but they do not restrict you for what you think (yet) So I post stories... how I feel about the stories are personal to me. Remember "they CAN"T hang you for what you don't say"

The readers can decide and post thier thoughts on stories.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 11:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by bluestar.ranch

Originally posted by Havox

Originally posted by bluestar.ranch

Originally posted by mblahnikluver
Do you think you could maybe quote something from the article and give your opinion instead of posting a link and a line?


I would love to give my opinion..but I placed a link to the entire story in place of my personal opinion. (If I give my opinion the mods will delete the thread and ban me) So read this if its interesting to you GOOD I CANT express my opinions any more the way I want to freely... ATS is changing....(but that's my opinion)

Why would the mods ban you for giving your opinion..?


Because many threads that are against "cultural normal" responses are not acceptable to print. For an example: the little 8 year old girl that was murdered on her wedding night? I wanted to say "maybe the arsehole should have pleasured himself with one of his goats after molesting the child instead of murdering her....It might be racist to say that some middle eastern people raise goats.... But I did not want to post that... It was my "opinion:"

Therefore the mods restrict what can be said, but they do not restrict you for what you think (yet) So I post stories... how I feel about the stories are personal to me. Remember "they CAN"T hang you for what you don't say"

The readers can decide and post thier thoughts on stories.




So, you won't post it to that thread but you post it to this one?


Ooook.

Anyway, yeah, you *should* give your opinion and some commentary about your OP to help facilitate discussion, as per the ATS T&C on starting new threads.

That said, if you can't give said opinions or commentary without violating T&C, then there is a problem.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 11:30 AM
link   
reply to post by bluestar.ranch
 


Just provide a qote from the article and put your opinion after it.



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 11:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by kimish
There's got to be more to it then what the article says.


I'm not so sure...



Police officials claim that there is no video of the altercation and that all associated radio logs have been deleted by system malfunctioning for this time period.”


If that doesn't look suspicious...



posted on May, 22 2013 @ 12:02 PM
link   
reply to post by bluestar.ranch
 


He may not be guilty of the original thing that he was stopped for, but you're still jumping to conclusions with the innocent thing. On the surface, yeah ... a cop beating someone for nothing, that is bad. But you really have no idea what transpired here; neither do I. Making assumptions about what this guy did or did not do is both foolish and shortsighted.

Get the facts, develop an informed opinion on the matter. Dont just automatically jump on the side against the cop, otherwise you're really no better than the people you complain about.




top topics



 
3

log in

join