It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SQUEALER
Originally posted by conz1992
I don't know how credible the BBC are, but there are 'suspicions' that it is a terrorist attack, there are no confirmations as of yet if it was a terrorist attack, or even if it was a soldier that was killed.
What do you mean? Of course, it's a terrorist attack. What else could it be? Man gets head chopped off. If that's not terrifying, what is? Why must there be confirmation, that it's perpetrators are Muslim, or Arabic descent, before the label "terrorist" can be applied? In the days of IRA resistance, this would terror by Irish. But, it doesn't matter who is doing the terrorizing. Terrorism is terrorism, it knows no color or ethnic group. Robbers often terrorize their victims, when they enter a house and the occupants wake up.
A man's head is lying on the ground, there's no need for "confirmations" of terror.
edit on 22-5-2013 by SQUEALER because: (no reason given)edit on 22-5-2013 by SQUEALER because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by paradisepurple
Paratus, I have to agree with all your posts here, I cannot hear any mention of Allah on any of the videos and in particular the witness 'Jamie' who has given a lengthy interview doesn't mention this either....
edit on 22-5-2013 by paradisepurple because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Did they linger after committing the murder in order to explain, and attempt to justify, their actions to witnesses?
Also, they showed no interest in attacking anyone else, even though they could easily have done so.
I think this is political, rather than religious. But it's early days and we don't yet know all the facts.