It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by muzzleflash
If he really died in their custody we have only two options I can see:
1) Total complete negligence and irresponsibility.
or
2) Politically motivated government sponsored murder.
He did not "die in custody" as you are suggesting, he was being interviwed by the FBI when something supposedly caused one FBI agent to feel threatened.
Without you actually being there you have no idea what happened, and you are jumping to conclusions.
All we know is that this young man was being interviewed by the FBI in connection to the bombing, he made plans to leave the country, they went to see him again and he was shot...
Now, tell me, if he needed to be "silenced" in some way by some suspicious group of people, why didn't he find himself falling in front of a bus? Why didn't he die from carbon monoxide poisoning? Why didn't he "commit suicide"?
If an agency wants to silence someone they don't do it with their damned name attached to it! They would do it from a distance, so that they could not be blamed and would not get any attention from it.
The idea that they would just walk in and shoot someone is so stupid I'm surprised people here support that idea at all.
Ibragim Todashev, who was shot and killed at the Windhover condominium complex near Kirkman Avenue and Vineland Road, was "about to sign a statement" admitting to a role, along with Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, in an unsolved triple-murder in Massachusetts in 2011, two people with direct knowledge of the case told ABC News. Todashev "just went crazy," and pulled a knife during his interview with the FBI, said state and federal law enforcement officials.
Originally posted by CasaVigilante
...There were several non-FBI witnesses present (including State Troopers) so maybe they won't have total control over any cover-up operation. "Staties" are usually at odds with the feds...
Originally posted by SkyLiner
Originally posted by CasaVigilante
...There were several non-FBI witnesses present (including State Troopers) so maybe they won't have total control over any cover-up operation. "Staties" are usually at odds with the feds...
Theses "Staties" (State Police), way down in Florida, are actually 2 Massachusetts State Police Troopers.
- Attending with the FBI agent, along with "other law enforcement personnel."
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Ok since we don't know anything let's pretend a wild scenario.
Let's say the FBI let the guy go, but was still suspicious for legit reasons. And had an agent trail him after they released him to see where he would go and what he would do.
Let's say the agent followed him to a 'safe house' where he went to do something to hide evidence, or tip associates off to the dragnet coming down on them.
Let's say the agent confronted the guy red handed, and said 'freeze FBI'!
And let's say the suspect then pulled a gun and started firing in desperation. And the FBI agent put him down in self-defense.
Let's assume this rare scenario for a moment:
What happened was still most likely the wrong decision because he should have called for backup instead of confronting the suspect alone. Things have to be done by the book for many good reasons.
However, the source has since clarified saying the agents told investigators Todashev came at him with a large sword-like weapon.
The agent was injured when the table was overturned and the agent's head was smashed into the wall. The agent was hospitalized and received nine stitches in his head.