It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _Del_
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
So why is the IRs 'aplogizing' if it did nothing wrong eh?
Oh because they were doing something wrong, please feel free to continue to defend a corrupt government organization tho...
And why is the President outraged? Apparently he's more outraged or just as outraged as anyone else. Seems odd that the White House is so "outraged" when it's all a tempest in a teacup according to XPLodER and other pundits like him...
The OP is doing the job the MSM has failed to do.
Is subverting charities for politics acceptable? How are charities being subverted, and if a message coincides then it isn't. Catholic charities provide soup and prayers. Baptist charities provide the same. Tea Party organisations may just be preaching a different message.
Self-reliance, freedom from government subservience being just a couple messages that are being provided.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by _Del_
Why is Obama outraged?
It's like being stuck in the elevator and someone passes gas point to someone else when in fact the smeller is the fellar.
Fake outrage by misdirection.edit on 20-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by XPLodER
No, it doesn't really help. What are you arguing here? Who are you debating? Obama, your President, has said....HIMSELF....this is misconduct. He's used the word inexcusable and he's personally called for investigation. Not just ONCE.
You would seem to be debating the President's own words, admissions and meanings. The only thing I'm finding surprising with Obama is that he figured he could heave-ho the IRS head under the bus and not have it come BACK on him as a sign of poor leadership for it having happened in the first place.
However, every point you're debating isn't a point I've made. It's a point those being accused, in the oddest twist of this story, have already stipulated to and in as many words. :shk:
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
Neo, I think we're seeing such a cascade of scandals because people are realizing that it just isn't one thing or two.
I could imagine TPM's getting isolated for permits, but at this time it'd be mere speculation.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by XPLodER
So you're saying OWS got the same treatment as the Tea Party.
Okay.
And that makes it okay, to target, to profile organisations based on their ideologies?
You're okay with this? Really?
Look, I fought some of the messages that OWS was trying to portray, but I never wanted them silenced and even fought for their rights to freely assemble!
You seem to be taking sides as to whom gets to enjoy freedoms and who doesn't.
Originally posted by XPLodER
why are political parties banned from tax exempt status?
because they can subvert money from the public good for personal use in electing ones "friends"
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by XPLodER
So explain to me how someone who doesn't have a job or any money and living out of a tent(OWS) would get 'targeted' by the IRS.edit on 20-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
President Obama's half-brother runs an off-the-books American charity that claims to support poor Kenyans -- but it lies about its federal status and no one knows how it spends its money. The foundation claims to be a tax-exempt, federally recognized nonprofit. It is not.
Nor are there any filings of its expenditures, which the IRS requires of larger charities.
Alton Ray Baysden, a former State Department employee at whose Virginia home the charity was founded in 2008, admitted the organization has not even applied for tax-exempt status.
Lois Lerner, the senior IRS official at the center of the decision to target tea party groups for burdensome tax scrutiny, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a shady charity headed by the president’s half-brother that operated illegally for years.
According to the organization’s filings, Lerner approved the foundation’s tax status within a month of filing, an unprecedented timeline that stands in stark contrast to conservative organizations that have been waiting for more than three years, in some cases, for approval.
Originally posted by littled16
reply to post by neo96
What part of "The Buck Stops Here" do folks not understand? If this were GWB nobody would be defending him here. Everyone would be like "He's the Potus and ultimately the responsibility lies at his feet".
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96
Neo, I think we're seeing such a cascade of scandals because people are realizing that it just isn't one thing or two.
I could imagine TPM's getting isolated for permits, but at this time it'd be mere speculation.
Same here, and yes it is speculation, but never thought a government agency (IRS) would target anyone because of their politics.