It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nwtrucker
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Uh, try the "tried and true method of ONE (1) male and ONE (1) female.
This gives the child a chance to have a balanced upbringing. This may be a new concept to you and I'm sure the justifications for otherwise will be spewed in response.
Of course, on the current trend where two lesbian women are giving their child ("responsibility") a drug which suppresses both Hormones so the child can "choose" it's sexual preference. ( California). Not a direction that makes much sense to me.
So His "whim" as you call it is, in fact, not a whim, but a tried and true system.
How dare he?? How dare he not....edit on 20-5-2013 by nwtrucker because: grammar
Originally posted by nwtrucker
reply to post by flobot
Nope. They shouldn't take kids away from single parents. But that's where I draw the/my line.
Originally posted by nwtrucker
reply to post by flobot
Sure you do. You're just pecking at my view of it. LOL. Ok. for the record, a single parent is less than "ideal". It can and does work, one parent being better than none.
Somewhere a line has to be drawn. Acceptable, not acceptable. Will some suffer as a result of a "line"? Maybe, even probably. Oh well.
The kids are the priority, not gay rights. Do your thing, stay away from the kids.. JMHO.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
How dare this judge determine on his own whims
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by muzzleflash
Sure people make politically charged decisions all the time, in areas where politics should not apply.
What I'm saying and the poster above who mentioned it in the first place is that treating everything as politically charged actually hurts the overall goal of having these 'case by case' basis judgements that we want to see in our justice system.
*snip*
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I find the idea that gay people "want to ruin children's minds and destroy families" VERY curious! What could possibly be the advantage of ruining children's minds and destroying families? There is none. What could be the motivation for gay people (or ANYONE) to want to do that? There is none.