It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by old_god
reply to post by Revolution9
Israel is the one who started the whole thing, don't forget that or deny it (Israel and it's cohorts)...unfortunately it's backfired and the place has erupted into a civil mess that is out of control.
Welcome to Hell.
Originally posted by Britguy
reply to post by RAY1990
I don't think religion has anything to do with it. After all, Syria was a completely secular country, with everyone being free to practice their chosen religion. What we have been seeing is the West - US, UK and other NATO members - arming and supplying intel and logistics to fundamentalist fighters flooding in from other countries, who have been attacking people of ALL religions without any consideration for those freedoms previously enjoyed by the Syrian people.
What it IS about is removing both a state that stands up to Israel in the region and, perhaps more importantly for some, one that does not allow a foreign owned and operated central bank issuing money at interest to the government.
The situation in Syria is far from being a Civil War, as portrayed by much of the bank owned corporate media and our similarly paid for politicians. Israeli actions against Syria are designed simply to try and garner a response so that the US, UK and other NATO members can step in and protect Israel, who gets to play victim again.
The tired old story that they are attacking Syria to stop it passing chemical / biological or sophisticated weapons to Hezbollah is par for the course and can be used without having to provide one shred of physical evidence to back it up. It is also a breach of international law, but good luck to anyone thinking about bringing this up at the UN, when we have seen so many times in the past such breeches being ignored when it's us (or our alleged allies) carrying out those acts!
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by deckdel
reply to post by Rocker2013
Firing missiles on civilian targets is just cowardly. Why don't they (the Syrians) engage in air battle, or with air defense? The correct course of action is to engage aggressor, its forces, and not then shoot in the back with missiles.
My point being: right now, Syria is just a sitting duck. Nothing more. And they need to do something about that. First step would be to get some decent air defense missiles, and an early warning radar system. Upgrade air forces. And not that much think the missiles. Focus to shoot soldiers/pilots and not civilians.
And why should Syria do any of this? You do know we are talking about Israel right? Israels specialty is attacking civilians just look at their track record in places like Gaza.
Oh buster, once again ignoring the inconvenient evidence of Assad's military opening fire on peaceful protesters. Plenty of us remember exactly how the war in Syria started, and there are plenty of videos out there showing Assad's men, his jets, his helicopters attacking unarmed civilian populations.
Enough with the Assad cheer leading already, formulate some real opinions without feeling this incomprehensible need to defend atrocities just because the one committing them is anti-Israel
You're sounding more and more like a propagandist, just leaping to the defence of any nation standing up to Israel regardless of the complexities of the violence.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
Firing missiles on civilian targets is just cowardly.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
And if Hezblollah
Originally posted by 0SolidSnake0
Come on Syria Attack them already.They attacked you twice .
Maybe then the rebels and the Syrian government will unite to face the Zionists, on one side, and you got Hezbollah on another side. and Hamas on a third side. Free Palestine from the Zionists. But then of course Big Brother will have to stick his nose in.
Originally posted by micmerci
Quick question: If Syria is so capable militarily, why are they having so much trouble against the rebels. Wouldn't it be logical to think that they could wipe them out effortlessly? And if they are experiencing so much trouble with the rebels, how much more with the entire nation of Israel?
Note: I know this post could appear as snarky but I really am looking for objective answers to the questions.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by micmerci
Quick question: If Syria is so capable militarily, why are they having so much trouble against the rebels. Wouldn't it be logical to think that they could wipe them out effortlessly? And if they are experiencing so much trouble with the rebels, how much more with the entire nation of Israel?
Note: I know this post could appear as snarky but I really am looking for objective answers to the questions.
Without foreign assistance the terrorists would have already been crushed by the Syrian army.
Originally posted by micmerci
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by micmerci
Quick question: If Syria is so capable militarily, why are they having so much trouble against the rebels. Wouldn't it be logical to think that they could wipe them out effortlessly? And if they are experiencing so much trouble with the rebels, how much more with the entire nation of Israel?
Note: I know this post could appear as snarky but I really am looking for objective answers to the questions.
Without foreign assistance the terrorists would have already been crushed by the Syrian army.
This answer doesn't follow logic. There may be outside assistance but it certainly is not of the degree and magnitude of an entire nations military forces. Maybe Syria is a wee bit overrated as other countries have been in the not so distant past?
Originally posted by micmerci
This answer doesn't follow logic. There may be outside assistance but it certainly is not of the degree and magnitude of an entire nations military forces. Maybe Syria is a wee bit overrated as other countries have been in the not so distant past?
Originally posted by micmerci
Quick question: If Syria is so capable militarily, why are they having so much trouble against the rebels.
Because the rebels are backed by the United States of Israel and England.
Simple answer.
Originally posted by WilliamOckham
I like how predictable you anti-Israel ilk are & completely choose to ignore the FACT that Israel's attacks were retaliatory in nature. Yeah, keep ignoring Hamas and Hezbollah's rockets and bombs......keep victimizing the aggressors
Syria would be wise to stop barking so loud or they are going to get their arses handed to them.,,,no vaseline..
Originally posted by LastStarfighter
Originally posted by WilliamOckham
I like how predictable you anti-Israel ilk are & completely choose to ignore the FACT that Israel's attacks were retaliatory in nature. Yeah, keep ignoring Hamas and Hezbollah's rockets and bombs......keep victimizing the aggressors
Syria would be wise to stop barking so loud or they are going to get their arses handed to them.,,,no vaseline..
Israel is occupying land and treating people like Nazi's my friend,
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
All you people jeering and advocating nuclear war and warmongering in general are fools. The cost of life would be catastrophic all across the region and the fallout would kill millions more wherever the wind blows it. One day your bloodlust will come back on you and i hope on that day i am standing there to see it.