It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cabin
Originally posted by Nephalim
Then those art schools are wasting their time and their students time, not to mention tuition money. They can teach those particulars in art class because they're integral to an art students specialization and art itself.
Lessons can be combined and focused into a concentration as they pertain to that field.
I believe your noteworthy mentions only help to prove my point.
Here is no tuition money... Universities are free of charge, as they should be.
If only these terms were covered it would give nothing. A deeper understanding needs to be in order for the change to happen, it has to be part of thinking, in order to understand these well, one needs to learn quite complex mathemathics.
Many famous artists were also mathemathicians, engineers, scientists.
Da Vinci is probably the best example. Salvador Dali, Pablo Picasso.
From Music, Bartok, Debussy, Satie come to mind.
Most classics used mathemathics, whether consciously or subconciously in their works, which mean their thinking skills were strong enough. They did not even need to learn mathemathics in order to use it in their fields. It came naturally -genius-level.
Who knows maybe we would not have all this amazing art, if some had not learned such thinking through math...
Originally posted by BoogieMan911
Any person who needs maths for their job now-days can now type in the numbers on their mobile phone, so the "pencil and paper" or "mind-calculating" days are over.
As for science, so much is suppressed, and some science can even lead to death - Water Powered Cars ect.
So I agree with this guy.
Originally posted by groingrinder
When I became a draftsman, I used all the Trigonometry and Geometry I had desperately tried to sleep through in school. Luckily some of it stuck.
Originally posted by StarsInDust
reply to post by rickymouse
Most of the math and science we learn in school is useless in a real world scenario unless you are in that field.
I used to believe that too ( about math, always loved science) when I was younger, but I no longer feel that is true. That is because math makes you think, it exercises the brain and make us more critical thinkers. I wouldn't be so fast to dismiss this as a worthwhile subject, just because it might be hard to figure out. It's designed to be that way.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Cabin
Why are there 15,000 political science students.......do we really need that many????
Mild electric shocks to brain may help students solve maths problems
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Cabin
Why are there 15,000 political science students.......do we really need that many????
-- if your goal is to become a lawyer.
Originally posted by iunlimited491
After elementary school, kids should begin learning about some of the issues plaguing society, and condition them to 'want' to try and solve them. Whatever skill-set that requires will come after the fact. Motivate them to become free thinkers, and act accordingly for the benefit of the planet.
Originally posted by Liquesence
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Cabin
Why are there 15,000 political science students.......do we really need that many????
Should we (schools, government) institute a policy that dictates how many people are allowed to study a certain (undergraduate) disciple for a degree?
(Advanced degrees are a bit different).