It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FollowTheWhiteRabbit
reply to post by Aleister
John 10:33 is one verse that contradicts you:
33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”
Jesus did say He was God. "I and my Father are one" isn't some deep metaphysical statement. Though the angels and prophets rebuked those that worshiped them, Jesus welcomed it.
John 14
28 "You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.
Originally posted by U4ea82
reply to post by jhill76
I think if there is a God, he/she merely wants us to be love each other, and to live life in way that makes him proud. To help each other navigate the hard parts of life with love and understanding and to give each other hope when we need it most. I hardly think he would want us to have wars in his name and destroy each other. That makes no sense to me and I refuse to believe in a God who would want that.
My opinion might seem too simple or juvenile for some but, it's what I believe. I think we over think religion too often and that's where problems start to appear.
edit on 19-5-2013 by U4ea82 because: Afterthought
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Originally posted by FollowTheWhiteRabbit
reply to post by Aleister
John 10:33 is one verse that contradicts you:
33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”
Jesus did say He was God. "I and my Father are one" isn't some deep metaphysical statement. Though the angels and prophets rebuked those that worshiped them, Jesus welcomed it.
Jesus also said:
John 14
28 "You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you.' If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I.
How could he go to himself and how is he greater than himself?
edit on 18-5-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
(21.3) 1:0.3 The enlightened worlds all recognize and worship the Universal Father, the eternal maker and infinite upholder of all creation. The will creatures of universe upon universe have embarked upon the long, long Paradise journey, the fascinating struggle of the eternal adventure of attaining God the Father. The transcendent goal of the children of time is to find the eternal God, to comprehend the divine nature, to recognize the Universal Father. God-knowing creatures have only one supreme ambition, just one consuming desire, and that is to become, as they are in their spheres, like him as he is in his Paradise perfection of personality and in his universal sphere of righteous supremacy. From the Universal Father who inhabits eternity there has gone forth the supreme mandate, “Be you perfect, even as I am perfect.” In love and mercy the messengers of Paradise have carried this divine exhortation down through the ages and out through the universes, even to such lowly animal-origin creatures as the human races of Urantia.
(1222.2) 111:6.3 The problem of sin is not self-existent in the finite world. The fact of finiteness is not evil or sinful. The finite world was made by an infinite Creator — it is the handiwork of his divine Sons — and therefore it must be good. It is the misuse, distortion, and perversion of the finite that gives origin to evil and sin.
JESUS of Nazareth:
(1907.2) 175:1.10 “While you should honor your rulers and reverence your teachers, you should call no man Father in the spiritual sense, for there is one who is your Father, even God. Neither should you seek to lord it over your brethren in the kingdom. Remember, I have taught you that he who would be greatest among you should become the server of all. If you presume to exalt yourselves before God, you will certainly be humbled; but whoso truly humbles himself will surely be exalted. Seek in your daily lives, not selfglorification, but the glory of God. Intelligently subordinate your own wills to the will of the Father in heaven.
Originally posted by jhill76
I have seen a quote posted:
Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu...all paths lead to God.
It seems as this would be correct. As what all these have in common, is teaching self to be better.
If religion teaches said person to be better, would that be what Father would want ultimately? As long as you lived life in a good way, no matter how you did it, religion or not.
But, it seems religion wants to claim sole rights on God. (Jesus is the only way, Allah is the true God, etc.)
Would God really punish a person for being good throughout life?
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come:The old has gone, the new is here! All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God.
2 Corinthians 5:17-21
Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu...all paths lead to God
Originally posted by U4ea82
reply to post by jhill76
I think if there is a God, he/she merely wants us to be love each other, and to live life in way that makes him proud. To help each other navigate the hard parts of life with love and understanding and to give each other hope when we need it most. I hardly think he would want us to have wars in his name and destroy each other. That makes no sense to me and I refuse to believe in a God who would want that.
My opinion might seem too simple or juvenile for some but, it's what I believe. I think we over think religion too often and that's where problems start to appear.
edit on 19-5-2013 by U4ea82 because: Afterthought
The "lake of eternal fire" Hell concept is archaic and pretty much, by various factors (Jewish understanding of Hell, hermeneutics, simple logic) is unbiblical. However, there is, by these same factors, a "second death."
But the fact remains that modern Christianity wants to present you with a one-sided image of God, that His glory is manifest in love only. No, God's glory is manifest in His love AND wrath.
What you're suggesting is that God, who gives you every chance in the world to come to Him through His Son, Jesus, is supposed to gve you a free pass in the end for living a worldly, pagan life and rejecting salvation? Now how does THAT make sense?
Would you want a judge who only finds people innocent? Of course not, there's jo justice in that.
If God is love, then his family must be protected. This is where hell fits into the picture. In Romans 1, his wrath is not against those who sin, but against those who suppress the truth. Paul told us this.
Also, apart from Paul, we would not realize that Jesus was teaching the same topic as the OT. Man cannot please God with sacrifice.
Mercy and Grace is necessary.
There can be no boasting with God. If man can enter heaven and say, "Look at what I did," there was no need for the Son of God to propitiate on our behalf. Living life should show you quick enough that you cannot do it on your own.
Read the sermon on the mount. Have you sold everything and given to the poor? Then you are selfish and are marked with that mark, just like all of us.
As a necessity, there must be a scapegoat provided for the Son, just as God provided one for Abraham. The Son remained safe. Satan was that scapegoat and those who willing suppress the truth with him.
I don't think that is you, but I would not be willing to deny any part of the message in favor of my own understanding.
It all stands as unified, including Paul's message that Grace and Mercy is the gospel. If not, we are all condemned.
Originally posted by Mads1987
reply to post by Akragon
It means what it means. Don't think it needs that much of an interpretation. Be good to others.
But there is also an element of equality in it. That one man is worth just as much as the next, and should be treaded the same.
I hope you have got a point, cause I don't see what it has to do with anything?
Originally posted by jhill76
If religion teaches said person to be better, would that be what Father would want ultimately? As long as you lived life in a good way, no matter how you did it, religion or not.
Was John a false teacher as well?
John 1:17
For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.
Again, Paul is the key to know why Grace is not earned, but a gift.
Originally posted by jhill76
It seems as this would be correct. As what all these have in common, is teaching self to be better.
If religion teaches said person to be better, would that be what Father would want ultimately? As long as you lived life in a good way, no matter how you did it, religion or not.