It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hey... Now there's an excellent idea !!
From now on, no women across the entire planet is to ever, ever participate in sexual intercourse unless she and her fellow participant are purposefully doing so in an attempt to procreate.
The court decided that single people have the right to contraceptives. What’s that got to do with marriage? Everything, because what the Supreme Court essentially said is single people have the right to engage in sexual intercourse.
........
It’s not the contraception, everybody thinks it’s about contraception, but what this court case said was young people have the right to engage in sex outside of marriage. Society never gave young people that right, functioning societies don’t do that, they stop it, they punish it, they corral people, they shame people, they do whatever.
Family Research Council fellow Pat Fagan
I’m not the ultimate judge in either scenario…I’m just a guy with an opinion.
Here's an Idea STOP HAVING BABIES.
If you do not want or are not able to spend the next 18 years of your life to have a baby, than you should take precautions to make sure it doesn't happen.
Originally posted by seabag
Abstinence until you’re responsible!!
Originally posted by CranialSponge
reply to post by BriGuyTM90
Here's an Idea STOP HAVING BABIES.
Tell that to a fertile uterus and testicles fully loaded with sperm.
If you do not want or are not able to spend the next 18 years of your life to have a baby, than you should take precautions to make sure it doesn't happen.
There's only ONE precaution that is an absolute guarantee of no accidents happening... abstinence.
Are you prepared to only participate in sexual intercourse 2 or 3 times in your entire adult life for the sole purpose of creating a baby and at no other time... EVER ?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
I'm Gay.
And there are contraceptives that work.
Originally posted by CranialSponge
I have an idea...
We could build a thousand foot wall around the entire equator of the planet. The women take the northern hemisphere and the men take the southern hemisphere.
And the only time we're allowed to interact with one another is when it's time to make a baby.
edit on 19-5-2013 by CranialSponge because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by CranialSponge
I have an idea...
We could build a thousand foot wall around the entire equator of the planet. The women take the northern hemisphere and the men take the southern hemisphere.
And the only time we're allowed to interact with one another is when it's time to make a baby.
edit on 19-5-2013 by CranialSponge because: (no reason given)
Or, how about this: Forced vasectomies for all boys before the age of puberty. Then when he wants to have children, he has to apply for a reversal. In between each planned child, he has to have the vasectomy again (to prevent him from cheating on his wife and having an unwanted "love" child.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by CranialSponge
I have an idea...
We could build a thousand foot wall around the entire equator of the planet. The women take the northern hemisphere and the men take the southern hemisphere.
And the only time we're allowed to interact with one another is when it's time to make a baby.
edit on 19-5-2013 by CranialSponge because: (no reason given)
Or, how about this: Forced vasectomies for all boys before the age of puberty. Then when he wants to have children, he has to apply for a reversal. In between each planned child, he has to have the vasectomy again (to prevent him from cheating on his wife and having an unwanted "love" child.
Originally posted by CranialSponge
Thank you for finally admitting that this entire abortion debate garbage is one of just opinion... much like religion and politics... they consist of individual opinions and nothing more.
This is the reason why these types of debates will never end.
Originally posted by CranialSponge
reply to post by BriGuyTM90
Here's an Idea STOP HAVING BABIES.
Tell that to a fertile uterus and testicles fully loaded with sperm.
If you do not want or are not able to spend the next 18 years of your life to have a baby, than you should take precautions to make sure it doesn't happen.
There's only ONE precaution that is an absolute guarantee of no accidents happening... abstinence.
Are you prepared to only participate in sexual intercourse 2 or 3 times in your entire adult life for the sole purpose of creating a baby and at no other time... EVER ?
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Originally posted by quietlearner
Originally posted by CranialSponge
Thank you for finally admitting that this entire abortion debate garbage is one of just opinion... much like religion and politics... they consist of individual opinions and nothing more.
This is the reason why these types of debates will never end.
Not really
OP's main point about hypocrisy and double standard is still holding on strong
I haven't seen any argument that invalidates OP's main point yet
Last night, only three months after it was introduced, the "Unborn Victims of Violence Act" passed the House of Representatives. During the floor debate, many Representatives spoke of the protection of women as the core value in this bill; they spoke of the protection of the fetus and mother. Many claimed criminals should be placed in jail for abusing a woman and her fetus. How ironic then, that only two of the cosponsors are also cosponsors of the "Violence Against Women Act of 1999"
Warm, inclusive rhetoric does not change the character of political gamesmanship. Let us not be fooled into believing that the "Unborn Victim of Violence" Act is a compassionate, pro-woman bill. We oppose this bill because it contradicts our biblical tradition; we oppose it because it is a disingenuous assault on reproductive freedom in America; we oppose it because of the hypocrisy exhibited by so many of its primary proponents. This is wrongheaded legislation achieved in a wrongheaded way.
Nation's Largest Jewish Organization Condemns House Vote on "Unborn Victims of Violence Act" (H.R. 2436)
In fact, she says, the bill is part of a “campaign to change the rhetoric” and establish the fetus as a person. “When they refer to a fertilized egg as a child and somehow keep hammering away at that, even some elected officials are confused, and certainly the public is confused.” The goal, Coombs says, is part of a “very careful, incremental campaign to overturn Roe and make abortion illegal.”
And while the public and members of Congress may be moved by the law’s apparent attempt to grapple with the loss of an unborn child, changing the definition of personhood has legal implications that could help unravel Roe. “Our strategy is to make sure that the senators whose records make it clear that they understand choice understand that a federal statute that establishes a fertilized egg as a person is in absolute conflict with a woman’s right to choose,” Coombs insists.
...........
Smeal of the Feminist Majority Foundation has been involved in the fight for abortion rights since before Roe vs. Wade was decided. Having fought to reinstate the Violence Against Women Act, funding for which has just been gutted, she is angry about the way the Unborn Victims of Violence Act was framed as a protection for women. “The hypocrisy just drives you crazy,” she says.
www.salon.com...
No, but how about holding off until one is fully capable of, and in the position to, handle the consequences of the same?
Reproductive "choices" should be between a man and a woman and her doctor. The government has no place in the bedroom or in the doctor's office.