It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EvilDuck
reply to post by luciddream
True enough. The people they do catch are probably not the biggest problems on our streets in the first place.
Originally posted by Berzerked
reply to post by Cabin
What do you mean, "someone will START taking advantage of it?"
I guess that you havent heard about that judge that was caught making deals with the owners of a private prison.
He was sentencing people to prison for offenses that would normally warrant a fine or probation.
Yep, he was caught and sentenced to 28 years..
Just think how many havent been caught though.
btw, in case your curious about that judge.. just google, "kids for cash scandal"edit on 17-5-2013 by Berzerked because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ttobban
reply to post by Hopechest
I agree with 'thisguyrightthere' on this one for the most part. It seems that if a law is a law, regardless of how valid it may be in usefulness, you are more than happy to just do whatever you're told to do. I'm glad that you are law abiding, but not all people are going to be as strong willed in decision making as you seem to be.
Now add to the fact that most people are in jail due to drugs like you said. I think that the victim of those crimes usually are nobody more than the people in jail themselves. I'm not comfortable jailing people for victimless crimes. It indicates that we don't want to help drug users... we'd rather just quarantine them from our lives and the lives of loved ones. If somebody wants to go home and smoke crack, then they are victimizing themself and should be left alone until they victimize someone else with their wrong doings.
It bothers me even more to see these power hungry judges to throw contempt of court sentences at people for calling the judge an explicative name after being punished for a victimless crime. I don't want tax payer money paying for a judge being bothered by someone calling him/her a name. We are in deep financial troubles in this country, and jailing people for victimless crimes is a waste of money. There are just as many drug users walking on the streets as there are in jail, so what's the point of paying for quarantining a small percentage of them?
Originally posted by ttobban
reply to post by Hopechest
You're putting yourself on a high horse, like you're better than those that use drugs. Good for you that you didn't have parents that brought you into the world already addicted to drugs, or into a situation of poverty that increases the chances of using drugs 100 times over. It's poor money management to isolate these problems from others that ride the same high horse you're on.
What about prescription drugs. You get a doctor that writes false prescriptions. He gets caught and gets jailed... like he should. Do you still want to jail all of the people that he helped get addicted to drugs? It could be hundreds of local residents who broke the laws of drug use, and it may not have been their fault.
“One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”
― Martin Luther King Jr.
“An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law”
― Martin Luther King Jr.
“An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so. Now the law of nonviolence says that violence should be resisted not by counter-violence but by nonviolence. This I do by breaking the law and by peacefully submitting to arrest and imprisonment.”
― Mahatma Gandhi, Non-violence in Peace and War 1942-49
“An unjust law is itself a species of violence. Arrest for its breach is more so.”
― Mahatma Gandhi
“That we should obey laws whether good or bad is a new-fangled notion. There was no such thing in former days. The people disregarded those laws they did not like and suffered the penalties for their breach.”
― Mahatma Gandhi, The Wit and Wisdom of Gandhi
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
― Ayn Rand
The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.
―Tacitus
The more laws, the less justice.
― Marcus Tullius Cicero
If the Nuremberg laws were applied, then every post-war American president would have been hanged.
― Noam Chomsky
The more laws and order are made prominent, the more thieves and robbers there will be.
― Lao Tzu
Originally posted by Hopechest
Yes, I would jail them all because they are breaking the law.
Originally posted by Guenter
Originally posted by Hopechest
Yes, I would jail them all because they are breaking the law.
Sorry. But this is a very "slippery" argument. Shall I remind you that the atrocities of the Nazis were done "LEGALLY" Just look up the Nuremberg race laws of 1936. I still have a German dictnorary form this time period that includes about 20 pages of these "Laws".
Originally posted by Hopechest
Well unlike Stalin's Russia, our people know what sends them to prison and yet they still do it.
Perhaps you shouldn't blame the prison system.
Originally posted by Guenter
reply to post by Hopechest
You change laws by disobeying them. Or simply by lobbying for them. And maybe have a clause of NON-ENFORCEMENT while a law is under revision/debate. As it happens in some countries. But one does not go around and shrugs shoulders with the comment: "Well its the law ...."