It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lies,Lies, and Damn lies: Obama blames Benghazi on Congress

page: 5
51
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2013 @ 03:57 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 


Oh but they can, and do control this countries response to terrorist attacks, and embassy security.

Then by that ;logic' the current administration is responsible for Benghazi:

The lack of response.
Followed up by covering it's own behind blaming a video.




posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:00 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 





So you are essentially admitting that your points have no point


Obama is the topic since that is the case him 'him blaming congress for his own incompetence' has no point in reality.

Nor do those who try to deflect that issue.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 





The previous administration invaded TWO countries, spent a trillion dollars and Didn't get Bin Laden, if you wanna talk about commander and chief. You should stop putting Your foot in your mouth.


And the current administration invaded 3 countries spent trillions more he didn't get Gaddafi libyan's beat and dragged him through the streets of Tripoli.

Then invaded another country Pakistan to "kill Bin Laden" and left a Pakistani doctor in prison, and took all the credit.

Then threw Seal Team six out with the bath water, then left 4 Americans out to die in Benghazi.
edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)


He did not invade three countries, don't exaggerate.

Obama incurred into other countries, invasion is a different concept all together.
Shall I use a dictionary?

Obama through team 6 out???


Ok...



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 





The previous administration invaded TWO countries, spent a trillion dollars and Didn't get Bin Laden, if you wanna talk about commander and chief. You should stop putting Your foot in your mouth.


And the current administration invaded 3 countries spent trillions more he didn't get Gaddafi libyan's beat and dragged him through the streets of Tripoli.

Then invaded another country Pakistan to "kill Bin Laden" and left a Pakistani doctor in prison, and took all the credit.

Then threw Seal Team six out with the bath water, then left 4 Americans out to die in Benghazi.
edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)


He did not invade three countries, don't exaggerate.

Obama incurred into other countries, invasion is a different concept all together.
Shall I use a dictionary?

Obama through team 6 out???


Ok...



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by dragonridr
 


Call for help? Where the heck is help gonna come from to fight the 100+ heavily armed war veteren terrorists. The nearest CREDIBLE help will be from NATO, at least a battalion size, and not the pathetic small spec ops team there.

Do remember, there were NO american troops in Libya. US only provided air support. Even if the Libyan transitional govt could get its act together in time, how many of the spec ops would be left alive?

Be glad and praise that someone had the brains to call off the support, or only MORE american deaths would have occured, and this issue would be a heavier sentence upon the administration if the spec ops were sent.

You need to take a chill pill and think things through. The only way for a resolution to the deaths of 4 brave americans is through investigation by FBI, as it was federal terrority that they were criminally imposed upon, to hunt down the murderers through even time and space to bring them to justice.

Congressional hearings and public forums over this issue are only ways partisan politics are being used by the republicans to turn american against americans and resolve nothing, more so when the facts and evidences are starkly clear. The culprits are the terrorists, and NOT the US administration, from the White House to the Military.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 





He did not invade three countries, don't exaggerate.


No exaggeration there bombing the hell out of people is an 'invasion'.

As per the definition:


invade

  Use Invade in a sentence in·vade [in-veyd] Show IPA verb, in·vad·ed, in·vad·ing. verb (used with object)

1. to enter forcefully as an enemy; go into with hostile intent: Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
2. to enter like an enemy: Locusts invaded the fields.
3. to enter as if to take possession: to invade a neighbor's home.
4. to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease: viruses that invade the bloodstream.
5. to intrude upon: to invade the privacy of a family.


dictionary.reference.com...

That is exactly what the current administration did.
edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 


Oh but they can, and do control this countries response to terrorist attacks, and embassy security.

Then by that ;logic' the current administration is responsible for Benghazi:

The lack of response.
Followed up by covering it's own behind blaming a video.


Sure, Obama is responsible the same way Bush was doing the 50 embassy assaults that occurred
During his regime.

You guys are trying to make it sound like this case is unusual, and I am
Here to state that it is not.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:05 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 


You can't answer a simple question without qualifying it.

You have proven and verified my point.

Thank you.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 





He did not invade three countries, don't exaggerate.


No exaggeration there bombing the hell out of people is an 'invasion'.

As per the definition:


invade

  Use Invade in a sentence in·vade [in-veyd] Show IPA verb, in·vad·ed, in·vad·ing. verb (used with object)

1. to enter forcefully as an enemy; go into with hostile intent: Germany invaded Poland in 1939.
2. to enter like an enemy: Locusts invaded the fields.
3. to enter as if to take possession: to invade a neighbor's home.
4. to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease: viruses that invade the bloodstream.
5. to intrude upon: to invade the privacy of a family.


That is exactly what the current administration did.


Read definition 3


Thanks for proving my point.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 


Deflection have anything new?

Bush blame a video?

Nope.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by cholo
 


You can't answer a simple question without qualifying it.

You have proven and verified my point.

Thank you.


My father taught me to qualify the assertions of liars.

You want me to stop, stop lying, easy.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by WonderBoi
Obama this and Obama that. Distraction, distraction, distraction. Now, i know why we'll never know the truth about history. It keeps getting buried in distraction. Can we solve 1 crime, before we try to solve the next?


It would be helpfull if the administration would stop committing them and covering them up, at least until Congress has a chance to catch up. I do agree though, it does all seem to center around Obama. One might even be tempted to believe he's the problem here...

edit on 16-5-2013 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 





Read definition 3


Libya was someone's home
Pakistan is someone's home.

Yeah the current administrations invasion's have been proven.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 


Deflection have anything new?

Bush blame a video?

Nope.



No actually, because the GOP didn't seem to care all 50 times that
Embassies were attacked under Bushs regime.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:11 PM
link   
reply to post by cholo
 


Any ambassadors die?

Did the administration try to cover it up?

Answer No to both.
edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by cholo

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 


Deflection have anything new?

Bush blame a video?

Nope.



No actually, because the GOP didn't seem to care all 50 times that
Embassies were attacked under Bushs regime.


Actually neither did the democrats........know why?

none of them were an attempted coverup.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by cholo
Sure, Obama is responsible the same way Bush was doing the 50 embassy assaults that occurred
During his regime.

You guys are trying to make it sound like this case is unusual, and I am
Here to state that it is not.


And Bush was very open and honest in discussing those embassy attacks with the American people and Congress, hiding nothing the same way... err, oooh this is awkward. I guess that's more of a difference than a comparison.

You are trying to herald Obama as if the man is a good, trustworthy, responsible leader, and I am here to state that he does not have so much as ONE of those qualities.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 





Read definition 3


Libya was someone's home
Pakistan is someone's home.

Yeah the current administrations invasion's have been proven.




No, sorry, Obama did not send in hundreds of thousands of Americans
Established bases And overthrow the governments of Lybian or Pakistan.



posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
 


Any ambassadors die?

Did the administration try to cover it up?

Answer No to both.
edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)


Oh yes, you are the one to worship government officials





posted on May, 16 2013 @ 04:16 PM
link   
Am I the only one that will be glad when these ill informed delicate flowers on the right move on to the next over hyped made up crises?


edit on 16-5-2013 by soundguy because: Edited so I don't offend the most delicate among us.



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join