It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
I suppose you give no credit to Eisenhower because the troops did the actual fighting
Eisenhower had military service, and was actually, a leader, not a blamer.
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Yes, it is the American people, not partisan politics that are the most important which is why, if a public servant, even if he is the chief public servant, causes through negligence, stupidity, or overt action he or she must be held accountable and even removed from the post he or she is entrusted. Misuse of the public trust by the chief executive from targeted audits of the IRS to negligence that leads to deaths to violating the sanctity of the free press all should be investigated and those responsible should be held accountable if we wish to have a free society.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
Not really,
That was leading from behind, and let others do the fighting, and dying, then take all the credit then spike the football of how totally awesome he is.
That is not a 'leader'
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by cholo
reply to post by neo96
Fighting from above is cheaper, and American troop don't have to die.
What you think of as cowardly, sounds pretty smart to me. Maybe Obama
Should send you since you are so courageous.
However, fighting from above often does not get the job done and puts innocent people at risk, especially in urban environments that are a chaotic mix of enemies and civilians. At times like this incident, boots on the ground is what is needed.
Obviously Obama did not learn the art of war being a community organizer.
I've been boots on the ground. You?
Obama was competent enough to kill Bin Laden, and decimate al queda leadership, so
Boots on the ground in Iraq And Afghanistan has been a marvelous idea, just what we need,
Another occupation, and a couple more hundred billion in debt!
No the SEALS that he gave permission to kill Bin Ladin did so. All the president does is give permission for the professionals to handle the problem: something he denied them in Benghazi. Fast reaction teams were on the tarmac ready to go not once, but twice. Those professionals could have rescued the embassy personel but were forbidden to do so. Whomever made that call is responsible for the deaths of those people.
And Obama would have been racked over the coals if the Bin Laden mission failed. It might have started and international event. Obama is commander and chief, I suppose you give no credit to Eisenhower because the troops did the actual fighting
It is cute that Obama is responsible for the act of Lybian fighters, but not for the mission that he green lighted and orchestrated, that is a very cute thing you want me to buy into.
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by cholo
But you're illustrating your own hypocrisy when you defend Obama by showing the wrongs that Bush did.
Hypocrite, thy name is cholo.
I don't blame Bush for embassy attacks under his watch, I blame the people who did the attacking.
I like your personal attack though. I bet when I attack back you and the gang will call the mods on me and
Pretend that I am the one dishing out all the venom I bet this post will be removed as the lot of you work to
Censor me by using the moderation system.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
A call anyone would have made what others would not have done is throw the body in the sea to swim with the fishes.
Forget the wanted dead or alive poster from the previous admin?edit on 16-5-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Yes, it is the American people, not partisan politics that are the most important which is why, if a public servant, even if he is the chief public servant, causes through negligence, stupidity, or overt action he or she must be held accountable and even removed from the post he or she is entrusted. Misuse of the public trust by the chief executive from targeted audits of the IRS to negligence that leads to deaths to violating the sanctity of the free press all should be investigated and those responsible should be held accountable if we wish to have a free society.
Yes, if a public servant had been negligent and stupid that had caused the american lives lost in Benghazi, should be held accountable before a court of law and be fairly judged.
BUT....had the president been negligent and stupid over the Benghazi event - an event NONE knew would happened, and even the ambassador himself who knew it was a dangerous area to go in decided on his own free will to go there, which cost the lives of 3 more precious americans trying to save him?
Was the authorities stupid NOT to send in the small team of spec ops to battle against a HARDED WAR EXPERIENCED 100+ HEAVILY ARMED TERRORIST GROUP there?
IF anyone is to be tried, the republcan ISSA should be sent for alluding that the president had been negligent and the military stupid. American need no fools like Issa CONTINUALLY kicking up a storm, and flogging a dead horse when there are more pressing issues such as the economy to settle.
AND, if anyone is negligent and stupid, be tried and remove from office, the republicans entire lot should be sent to leavenworth prison to serve time for neglecting the economy with their continued belligerences to serve the rich but tax the poor.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by cholo
But you're illustrating your own hypocrisy when you defend Obama by showing the wrongs that Bush did.
Hypocrite, thy name is cholo.
I don't blame Bush for embassy attacks under his watch, I blame the people who did the attacking.
I like your personal attack though. I bet when I attack back you and the gang will call the mods on me and
Pretend that I am the one dishing out all the venom I bet this post will be removed as the lot of you work to
Censor me by using the moderation system.
Straight question then.
Is Obama as culpable as Bush was?
Yes or no.
I'm sorry, I don't speak in Palin talk (what does leader from behind mean anyways?)
Did you expect Obama to get on a helicopter with seal team???
The previous administration invaded TWO countries, spent a trillion dollars and Didn't get Bin Laden, if you wanna talk about commander and chief. You should stop putting Your foot in your mouth.
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by cholo
I take your reply to mean..you aren't going to back up anything this time either? You really had a long running fight going on that other thread, when you claimed you were just leaving ATS forever. All anyone asked for there was support. Something to back your opinions with. Anything at all, really.
It's what I'm again asking for here. You're making claims that are supportable and provable....as true OR false. O'd love to have you show them to hold some truth. Thus far, you haven't and don't seem interested in support of any claim you're making here. That's a hard thing to debate...when the truth is pretty much, however you say it is and change as the debate goes on. Pics or it didn't happen...is a common refrain heard across ATS. In this case? Support or it's pure opinion.
Unfortunately this entire argument is based perspective and it is clear that you have a muddled perspective.
This entire thread is based upon the idea of culpability, which is a concept that is not based in fact, culpability is a
Judgement call, and I think you judgement is clouded by hatred for Obama.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by cholo
But you're illustrating your own hypocrisy when you defend Obama by showing the wrongs that Bush did.
Hypocrite, thy name is cholo.
I don't blame Bush for embassy attacks under his watch, I blame the people who did the attacking.
I like your personal attack though. I bet when I attack back you and the gang will call the mods on me and
Pretend that I am the one dishing out all the venom I bet this post will be removed as the lot of you work to
Censor me by using the moderation system.
Straight question then.
Is Obama as culpable as Bush was?
Yes or no.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by cholo
I'm sorry, I don't speak in Palin talk (what does leader from behind mean anyways?)
Sorry don't speak political trolling.
Did you expect Obama to get on a helicopter with seal team???
No I expect him to sit in a bunker, and watch it on TV like someone playing COD4.